Global disasters and the luck of the draw? A serendipity perspective on MNE responses to global disasters

IF 5.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2023.101084
Linglin (Gloria) Zheng , Heidi M. Wechtler , Mariano L.M. Heyden , Ricarda B. Bouncken
{"title":"Global disasters and the luck of the draw? A serendipity perspective on MNE responses to global disasters","authors":"Linglin (Gloria) Zheng ,&nbsp;Heidi M. Wechtler ,&nbsp;Mariano L.M. Heyden ,&nbsp;Ricarda B. Bouncken","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2023.101084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Why do some MNEs manage to thrive amidst global disasters? Amidst the most tumultuous of unprecedented global disasters, some MNEs still seem to thrive. While the MNE-disaster response literature often considers responses as deliberately planned actions, some organizations can simply find themselves at the ‘right place at the right time’ during disasters. Yet not all that MNEs seem able to leverage favorable chance events hidden within a disaster context. Accordingly, in this study, we apply the emerging theoretical lens of serendipity to theorize MNE disaster response, illustrated by Chinese MNE's responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. While disasters are expected to be detrimental to MNEs, this unprecedented crisis has shown mixed effects. We collect 89 articles from <em>Caijing</em>—an authoritative business magazine in China and conducted a qualitative analysis of manager-oriented discourse to investigate how the MNE managers made sense of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. We use the emerging serendipity perspective to recast and interpret reasons behind these mixed outcomes, drawing attention to why some MNE managers were able to ‘connect the dots’ and perceive value in the unexpected. Overall, we advance a timely introduction of serendipity to the MNE disaster response literature and build a preliminary bridge between theory, practice, and chance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"Article 101084"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000819/pdfft?md5=e0afa74b514dfad88d1d889b7bfc10e4&pid=1-s2.0-S1075425323000819-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425323000819","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why do some MNEs manage to thrive amidst global disasters? Amidst the most tumultuous of unprecedented global disasters, some MNEs still seem to thrive. While the MNE-disaster response literature often considers responses as deliberately planned actions, some organizations can simply find themselves at the ‘right place at the right time’ during disasters. Yet not all that MNEs seem able to leverage favorable chance events hidden within a disaster context. Accordingly, in this study, we apply the emerging theoretical lens of serendipity to theorize MNE disaster response, illustrated by Chinese MNE's responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. While disasters are expected to be detrimental to MNEs, this unprecedented crisis has shown mixed effects. We collect 89 articles from Caijing—an authoritative business magazine in China and conducted a qualitative analysis of manager-oriented discourse to investigate how the MNE managers made sense of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. We use the emerging serendipity perspective to recast and interpret reasons behind these mixed outcomes, drawing attention to why some MNE managers were able to ‘connect the dots’ and perceive value in the unexpected. Overall, we advance a timely introduction of serendipity to the MNE disaster response literature and build a preliminary bridge between theory, practice, and chance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球灾害与运气?从偶然性视角看跨国企业应对全球灾害的对策
为什么有些跨国企业能在全球灾难中茁壮成长?在史无前例的最动荡的全球灾难中,一些多国企业似乎仍然茁壮成长。虽然多国企业应对灾害的文献通常认为应对灾害是经过深思熟虑的计划行动,但有些组织在灾害发生时却能 "在正确的时间出现在正确的地点"。然而,并非所有跨国企业都能利用隐藏在灾害背景下的有利偶然事件。因此,在本研究中,我们运用 "偶然性 "这一新兴理论视角,以中国跨国企业对COVID-19大流行病的应对为例,对跨国企业的灾害应对进行理论分析。尽管人们预期灾难会对跨国企业造成损害,但这场前所未有的危机却显示出了好坏参半的效果。我们从中国权威商业杂志《财经》上收集了89篇文章,并对以管理者为导向的话语进行了定性分析,以研究跨国企业管理者如何理解COVID-19疫情的影响。我们利用新出现的偶然性视角来重新诠释和解释这些喜忧参半的结果背后的原因,提请人们注意为什么一些跨国企业经理人能够 "连点成线",并从意想不到的事情中发现价值。总之,我们适时地将偶然性引入跨国企业灾难应对文献,并在理论、实践和偶然性之间架起了一座初步的桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial on Doing business in Africa: Navigating opportunities and challenges in Africa's emerging markets Global strategy evolution, devolution or revolution: Disruptions to globalization and international business introversion When Global is Not Enough: Applying a Paradox Lens to Sustainability Transitions in Interorganizational Systems The joint effects of institutional logic multiplicity and distance on within-MNE CSR performance differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1