Consensus on global health competencies for Korean medical students using a modified Delphi method

Songrim Kim, Sun Young Kyung, Ie Byung Park, K. Park
{"title":"Consensus on global health competencies for Korean medical students using a modified Delphi method","authors":"Songrim Kim, Sun Young Kyung, Ie Byung Park, K. Park","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2023.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aimed to reach a consensus among experts on the global health competencies for medical students in Korea. Methods A global health competency model was developed to identify domains and competencies for medical education, and a three-round modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus among 21 experts on the essential global health competencies. The degree of convergence, degree of consensus, and content validity ratio of the model were used to reach a consensus. Results A list of 52 competencies in 12 domains were identified according to a literature review. In the first-round Delphi survey, the global health competencies were refined to 30 competencies in eight domains. In the second round, the competencies were reduced to 24. In the final round, consensus was reached among the expert panel members, and the competencies were finalized. The global health competency domains for medical students include global burden of disease (three items), globalization of health and healthcare (five items), determinants of health (two items), healthcare in low-resource settings (two items), global health governance (three items), health as a human right (four items), cultural diversity and health (three items), and participation in global health activities (two items). Conclusion The group of experts in global health achieved a consensus that 24 global health competencies in eight domains were essential for undergraduate medical education in Korea. The domains and competencies identified herein can be used to develop an undergraduate medical education curriculum in global health.","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"9 11","pages":"389 - 405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2023.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to reach a consensus among experts on the global health competencies for medical students in Korea. Methods A global health competency model was developed to identify domains and competencies for medical education, and a three-round modified Delphi method was used to reach consensus among 21 experts on the essential global health competencies. The degree of convergence, degree of consensus, and content validity ratio of the model were used to reach a consensus. Results A list of 52 competencies in 12 domains were identified according to a literature review. In the first-round Delphi survey, the global health competencies were refined to 30 competencies in eight domains. In the second round, the competencies were reduced to 24. In the final round, consensus was reached among the expert panel members, and the competencies were finalized. The global health competency domains for medical students include global burden of disease (three items), globalization of health and healthcare (five items), determinants of health (two items), healthcare in low-resource settings (two items), global health governance (three items), health as a human right (four items), cultural diversity and health (three items), and participation in global health activities (two items). Conclusion The group of experts in global health achieved a consensus that 24 global health competencies in eight domains were essential for undergraduate medical education in Korea. The domains and competencies identified herein can be used to develop an undergraduate medical education curriculum in global health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用改良德尔菲法就韩国医科学生的全球健康能力达成共识
目的本研究旨在就韩国医学生的全球健康能力达成专家共识。方法建立全球健康胜任力模型,确定医学教育的领域和胜任力,并采用三轮修正德尔菲法对21位专家进行全球健康基本胜任力评估。采用模型的收敛度、共识度、内容效度来达成共识。结果通过文献综述,确定了12个领域的52个胜任力。在第一轮德尔菲调查中,全球卫生能力被细化为8个领域的30个能力。在第二轮中,能力被减少到24项。在最后一轮中,专家小组成员达成共识,最终确定了能力。医学生的全球健康能力领域包括全球疾病负担(3个项目)、健康和保健全球化(5个项目)、健康决定因素(2个项目)、资源匮乏环境下的保健(2个项目)、全球健康治理(3个项目)、健康作为一项人权(4个项目)、文化多样性和健康(3个项目)以及参与全球健康活动(2个项目)。全球卫生专家组达成共识,认为8个领域的24项全球卫生能力对韩国本科医学教育至关重要。本文确定的领域和能力可用于开发全球健康本科医学教育课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1