Assessing Low-Concentration Atropine in Myopia Progression: A Systematic Review

Q3 Medicine Siriraj Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.33192/smj.v75i12.265388
Stella Nathania, Jovita Jutamulia, Gabriella Hafidha Badruddin
{"title":"Assessing Low-Concentration Atropine in Myopia Progression: A Systematic Review","authors":"Stella Nathania, Jovita Jutamulia, Gabriella Hafidha Badruddin","doi":"10.33192/smj.v75i12.265388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Low-concentration atropine (LCA) eye drop is used as a promising treatment for the management of myopia but its effectiveness has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the efficacy of LCA eye drop for myopia progression.\nMaterials and Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and a comprehensive literature search was performed on 3 online databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and ProQuest. The keywords used included ‘Low-concentration atropine eye drop’, ‘Atropine’, ‘Eye Drop’, ‘Myopia’, and their Mesh. All studies included were available in English and full-text format. Myopia progression rates were analyzed from all studies, and Rayyan, an online-based tool was used in the screening process.\nResults: The results showed that 3 randomized control trials (RCT), 2 cohort studies, and 3 case reports with a total of 1389 participants were analyzed. The majority studies were conducted in Asia, while one RCT was performed in Australia. The participants ranged from 4-12 years old, while atropine eye drop concentrations used were 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.125%, and 0.2%. All studies showed a slower progression rate of myopia in the atropine group compared to the control (-0.31 D vs. -0.90 D; -0.05 D vs. -1.05 D; -0.27 D vs. -0.81 D; -0.28 D vs. -0.54 D; -0.36 D vs. -0.90 D;−0.31 D vs. −0.76 D; -0.31 vs. -0.53 D; -0.38 D vs. -0.55 D) with P < 0.05.\nConclusion: LCA eye drop showed promising effects in slowing myopia progression. However, further investigation is needed, particularly in non-Asian countries.","PeriodicalId":37270,"journal":{"name":"Siriraj Medical Journal","volume":" 1275","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Siriraj Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33192/smj.v75i12.265388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Low-concentration atropine (LCA) eye drop is used as a promising treatment for the management of myopia but its effectiveness has not been widely evaluated. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the efficacy of LCA eye drop for myopia progression. Materials and Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and a comprehensive literature search was performed on 3 online databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and ProQuest. The keywords used included ‘Low-concentration atropine eye drop’, ‘Atropine’, ‘Eye Drop’, ‘Myopia’, and their Mesh. All studies included were available in English and full-text format. Myopia progression rates were analyzed from all studies, and Rayyan, an online-based tool was used in the screening process. Results: The results showed that 3 randomized control trials (RCT), 2 cohort studies, and 3 case reports with a total of 1389 participants were analyzed. The majority studies were conducted in Asia, while one RCT was performed in Australia. The participants ranged from 4-12 years old, while atropine eye drop concentrations used were 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.125%, and 0.2%. All studies showed a slower progression rate of myopia in the atropine group compared to the control (-0.31 D vs. -0.90 D; -0.05 D vs. -1.05 D; -0.27 D vs. -0.81 D; -0.28 D vs. -0.54 D; -0.36 D vs. -0.90 D;−0.31 D vs. −0.76 D; -0.31 vs. -0.53 D; -0.38 D vs. -0.55 D) with P < 0.05. Conclusion: LCA eye drop showed promising effects in slowing myopia progression. However, further investigation is needed, particularly in non-Asian countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估低浓度阿托品对近视发展的影响:系统回顾
目的:低浓度阿托品(LCA)滴眼液是治疗近视的一种很有前途的方法,但其疗效尚未得到广泛评价。因此,本研究旨在分析LCA滴眼液对近视进展的疗效。材料和方法:本综述遵循PRISMA指南进行,并在PubMed、Cochrane和ProQuest 3个在线数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。使用的关键词包括“低浓度阿托品滴眼液”、“阿托品”、“滴眼液”、“近视”及其网格。所有纳入的研究均以英文和全文格式提供。对所有研究的近视进展率进行分析,并在筛查过程中使用基于在线的工具Rayyan。结果:结果分析了3项随机对照试验(RCT)、2项队列研究和3份病例报告,共1389名受试者。大多数研究在亚洲进行,而一项随机对照试验在澳大利亚进行。参与者年龄从4-12岁不等,使用的阿托品滴眼液浓度分别为0.01%、0.025%、0.05%、0.1%、0.125%和0.2%。所有研究均显示,与对照组相比,阿托品组近视进展率较慢(-0.31 D vs -0.90 D;-0.05 D vs. -1.05 D;-0.27 D vs -0.81 D;-0.28 D vs. -0.54 D;-0.36 D vs -0.90 D; - 0.31 D vs - 0.76 D;-0.31 vs. -0.53 D;-0.38 D对-0.55 D), P < 0.05。结论:LCA滴眼液具有良好的延缓近视进展的效果。然而,需要进一步的调查,特别是在非亚洲国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Siriraj Medical Journal
Siriraj Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Incidences, Characteristics, Management and Outcomes of Different Subtypes of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study Optimizing Perioperative Care for Elderly Surgical Patients: A Review of Strategies and Evidence-Based Practices Comparison between the Standard Teaching and the Thai Version of Blended Teaching on Basic Airway Management in Siriraj Medical Students Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) and Outcomes in Preoperative Fast-track Geriatric Patients with Hip Fracture: A Single-center Retrospective Study Effectiveness of Smartphone Applications vs Conventional Care in Warfarin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Time in the Therapeutic Range
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1