Association of Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass Index With Adverse Events and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients Admitted for Rehabilitation

Hideki Arai MD , Syuya Okada PT , Tatsuyuki Fukuoka SLP, PhD , Masafumi Nozoe PT, PhD , Kuniyasu Kamiya PT, PhD , Satoru Matsumoto MD , Takeshi Morimoto MD, PhD MPH
{"title":"Association of Baseline Skeletal Muscle Mass Index With Adverse Events and Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients Admitted for Rehabilitation","authors":"Hideki Arai MD ,&nbsp;Syuya Okada PT ,&nbsp;Tatsuyuki Fukuoka SLP, PhD ,&nbsp;Masafumi Nozoe PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Kuniyasu Kamiya PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Satoru Matsumoto MD ,&nbsp;Takeshi Morimoto MD, PhD MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the associations of baseline skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) with adverse events and rehabilitation outcomes in patients admitted for rehabilitation.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>The subjects were 409 patients (mean age, 79 years; men, 167 [41%]) undergoing rehabilitation because of neurologic disease, musculoskeletal disorders, or hospital-associated deconditioning. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the definition of sarcopenia by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: those with low SMI (&lt;7.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in men and &lt;5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in women) and those with high SMI (≥7.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in men and ≥5.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in women).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcomes were adverse events including death and acute illness requiring transfer to other hospitals for specialized treatments. The secondary outcomes were rehabilitation outcomes including the efficiency scores (changes in functional independence measure [FIM] score divided by length of stay) of FIM for motor function (FIM-M) and FIM for cognitive function (FIM-C).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 409 patients, 299 (73%) had a low SMI. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of the low SMI group relative to the high SMI group for adverse events was 2.79 (1.06-7.34). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in FIM-M efficiency scores [mean ± SD, low SMI group: 0.4 (0.58) vs high SMI group: 0.47 (0.54), <em>P</em>=.3] and FIM-C efficiency scores [mean ± SD, 0.05 (0.14) vs 0.06 (0.2), <em>P</em>=.4]. Multiple linear regression models did not show significant associations between the low SMI group and FIM-M efficiency or FIM-C efficiency scores (β=0.064, <em>P</em>=.3; β=−0.05, <em>P</em>=.4, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Low baseline SMI was significantly associated with adverse events but not with rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000812/pdfft?md5=988096583e1173b04c964aaa4aa11244&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the associations of baseline skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) with adverse events and rehabilitation outcomes in patients admitted for rehabilitation.

Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Participants

The subjects were 409 patients (mean age, 79 years; men, 167 [41%]) undergoing rehabilitation because of neurologic disease, musculoskeletal disorders, or hospital-associated deconditioning. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the definition of sarcopenia by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: those with low SMI (<7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women) and those with high SMI (≥7.0 kg/m2 in men and ≥5.7 kg/m2 in women).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcomes were adverse events including death and acute illness requiring transfer to other hospitals for specialized treatments. The secondary outcomes were rehabilitation outcomes including the efficiency scores (changes in functional independence measure [FIM] score divided by length of stay) of FIM for motor function (FIM-M) and FIM for cognitive function (FIM-C).

Results

Of the 409 patients, 299 (73%) had a low SMI. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of the low SMI group relative to the high SMI group for adverse events was 2.79 (1.06-7.34). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in FIM-M efficiency scores [mean ± SD, low SMI group: 0.4 (0.58) vs high SMI group: 0.47 (0.54), P=.3] and FIM-C efficiency scores [mean ± SD, 0.05 (0.14) vs 0.06 (0.2), P=.4]. Multiple linear regression models did not show significant associations between the low SMI group and FIM-M efficiency or FIM-C efficiency scores (β=0.064, P=.3; β=−0.05, P=.4, respectively).

Conclusion

Low baseline SMI was significantly associated with adverse events but not with rehabilitation outcomes in patients undergoing rehabilitation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受康复治疗的患者基线骨骼肌质量指数与不良事件和康复效果的关系
目的评估基线骨骼肌质量指数(SMI)与康复患者的不良事件和康复结果之间的关系。参与者409名患者(平均年龄79岁;男性167人[41%])因神经系统疾病、肌肉骨骼疾病或医院相关的衰竭而接受康复治疗。根据亚洲肌少症工作组对肌少症的定义,患者被分为两组:低SMI(男性为7.0 kg/m2,女性为5.7 kg/m2)和高SMI(男性为≥7.0 kg/m2,女性为≥5.7 kg/m2)。次要结果为康复结果,包括运动功能FIM(FIM-M)和认知功能FIM(FIM-C)的效率得分(功能独立性测量[FIM]得分的变化除以住院时间)。相对于高 SMI 组,低 SMI 组发生不良事件的调整后危险比(95% 置信区间)为 2.79(1.06-7.34)。两组的 FIM-M 效率评分[平均值(± SD),低 SMI 组:0.4 (0.58) vs 高 SMI 组:0.47 (0.54),P=.3]和 FIM-C 效率评分[平均值(± SD),0.05 (0.14) vs 0.06 (0.2),P=.4]无明显差异。多元线性回归模型未显示低SMI组与FIM-M效率或FIM-C效率评分之间存在显著关联(分别为β=0.064,P=.3;β=-0.05,P=.4)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies Effects of Pilates on Body Posture: A Systematic Review Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Peer- and Clinician-Led Interventions for Caregivers of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury Creation of a Limb Loss and Preservation Registry for Improving the Quality of Patient Care in the United States Comparison of Diagnosis-Related Group Rehabilitation Reimbursement Payments With Those of a Novel Patient Classification-Based Payment System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1