Adequacy of Regulatory Framework to Minimize Disputes in Construction Projects

S. N. Malkanthi, A. G. M. Buraitha
{"title":"Adequacy of Regulatory Framework to Minimize Disputes in Construction Projects","authors":"S. N. Malkanthi, A. G. M. Buraitha","doi":"10.4038/jur.v11i1.8000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction industry is a competitive, complicated environment where people with various skills, perspectives, and levels of knowledge. Conflicts are unavoidable in this complicated setting due to differences in perspectives among project participants. Conflicts quickly develop into disagreements if they are not handled properly. The end goals of every construction project are to reduce cost, improve quality, and complete the job on schedule. One of the biggest things that prevents the construction project from being successfully finished is disputes. Construction conflicts have become significantly more common and complex in recent years. Consequently, it's critical to understand what leads to disagreements. However, in the event of a dispute, Dispute Resolution Methods are implemented to resolve differences and prevent the breach of relationship and communication between the parties to achieve the construction project in the desired time, budget, and quality. The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate the main factors that contribute to building disputes. Through a comprehensive literature review, 39 root causes of construction disputes were identified under seven categories namely client-related, contractor-related, design-related, contract-related, human behavior-related, project-related, and external factors. The responses gathered from construction industry specialists in Sri Lanka via a questionnaire survey were used to determine the significance of those indicated factors by converting them to the Relative Importance Index(RII). Results showed that the project-related category is the most significant category that causes disputes in construction projects. Additionally, correlation analysis shows that there is a strong relationship among the dispute-causing categories. Also, the respondents are familiar with “arbitration” as the dispute resolution method and they are satisfied with the “conditions of contract” as a Regulatory framework for dispute resolution. The findings support the notion that construction disputes are a source of concern for every project and that the best way to address this issue is to prevent and cautiously manage them to ensure the smooth operation of the construction process.","PeriodicalId":158329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the University of Ruhuna","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the University of Ruhuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jur.v11i1.8000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction industry is a competitive, complicated environment where people with various skills, perspectives, and levels of knowledge. Conflicts are unavoidable in this complicated setting due to differences in perspectives among project participants. Conflicts quickly develop into disagreements if they are not handled properly. The end goals of every construction project are to reduce cost, improve quality, and complete the job on schedule. One of the biggest things that prevents the construction project from being successfully finished is disputes. Construction conflicts have become significantly more common and complex in recent years. Consequently, it's critical to understand what leads to disagreements. However, in the event of a dispute, Dispute Resolution Methods are implemented to resolve differences and prevent the breach of relationship and communication between the parties to achieve the construction project in the desired time, budget, and quality. The purpose of this study was to identify and evaluate the main factors that contribute to building disputes. Through a comprehensive literature review, 39 root causes of construction disputes were identified under seven categories namely client-related, contractor-related, design-related, contract-related, human behavior-related, project-related, and external factors. The responses gathered from construction industry specialists in Sri Lanka via a questionnaire survey were used to determine the significance of those indicated factors by converting them to the Relative Importance Index(RII). Results showed that the project-related category is the most significant category that causes disputes in construction projects. Additionally, correlation analysis shows that there is a strong relationship among the dispute-causing categories. Also, the respondents are familiar with “arbitration” as the dispute resolution method and they are satisfied with the “conditions of contract” as a Regulatory framework for dispute resolution. The findings support the notion that construction disputes are a source of concern for every project and that the best way to address this issue is to prevent and cautiously manage them to ensure the smooth operation of the construction process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少建筑项目纠纷的监管框架是否充分
建筑行业是一个竞争激烈、环境复杂的行业,人们拥有不同的技能、观点和知识水平。在这个复杂的环境中,由于项目参与者的观点不同,冲突是不可避免的。如果处理不当,冲突很快就会发展成分歧。每一个建设项目的最终目标都是降低成本,提高质量,按时完成工作。阻碍建设项目顺利完成的最大问题之一是争议。近年来,建筑冲突变得越来越普遍和复杂。因此,了解导致分歧的原因是至关重要的。但是,在发生争议的情况下,实施争议解决办法,解决分歧,防止双方关系和沟通的破坏,以实现建设项目在预期的时间,预算和质量。本研究的目的是找出并评估造成纠纷的主要因素。通过全面的文献综述,确定了39个建筑纠纷的根本原因,分为7类,即与客户有关、与承包商有关、与设计有关、与合同有关、与人的行为有关、与项目有关、与外部因素有关。通过问卷调查收集了斯里兰卡建筑业专家的回复,通过将其转换为相对重要性指数(RII)来确定这些指示因素的重要性。结果表明,工程类纠纷是引起建设项目纠纷最显著的类别。此外,相关分析表明,引起争议的类别之间存在很强的相关性。此外,受访者熟悉“仲裁”作为争议解决方法,他们对“合同条件”作为争议解决的监管框架感到满意。研究结果支持这样一种观点,即施工纠纷是每个项目关注的一个问题,解决这一问题的最佳方法是预防和谨慎管理,以确保施工过程的顺利进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ideology in Critical Discourse Study: A Review of Literature Forecasting COVID-19 Daily Infected Cases in Sri Lanka by Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing Method Local Insights into Rural Tourism: A Study of Heeloya in the Knuckles Mountain Range Unravelling the Threads of Customer Loyalty: Motives Shaping Supermarket Patronage in Sri Lanka Impact of Cobalt-60 Gamma Irradiation on Growth, Development, and Morphology of Acalypha hispida (Cat’s Tail Plant)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1