Feasibility, safety and tolerability of CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation in COPD with malignant pulmonary nodules

Min Ao , Yunjiu Hu , Mi Zhou , Junhao Mu , Weiyi Li , Jing Liu , Xiaohui Wang , Li Yang
{"title":"Feasibility, safety and tolerability of CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation in COPD with malignant pulmonary nodules","authors":"Min Ao ,&nbsp;Yunjiu Hu ,&nbsp;Mi Zhou ,&nbsp;Junhao Mu ,&nbsp;Weiyi Li ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Wang ,&nbsp;Li Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ceh.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection was used as the first treatment. However, approximately 20% of patients were not suitable for surgery due to severe comorbidities. We verified the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of percutaneous thermal ablation for patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with peripheral high-risk pulmonary nodules in the real world. The patients with peripheral high-risk pulmonary nodules ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery who were ineligible or unwilling tosurgery underwent CT-guided thermal ablation in our hospital from January 1st, 2019 to May 31th, 2022 were retrospectively collected, and divided into COPD and non COPD group. Incidence, severity, risk factors of complications between in different severity of COPD and non-COPD group were compared. A total of 216 high-risk were enrolled, including 73 in COPD group and 143 in the non-COPD group. The average age, male gender, MMRC score, size of nodules, incidence of confirmed pathological diagnosis, and pneumothorax after thermal ablation were higher in the COPD group than in the non-COPD group. COPD was the only independent risk factor for pneumothorax after ablation. The incidence of pneumothorax increased with the severity of COPD, but no statistical significance. Compared to the baseline, the MMRC score was significantly increased in the COPD group, but there was no significant difference in the discharge time and hospitalization expenses between the COPD patients with or without pneumothorax. CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and feasible therapy for different severities of COPD with high-risk pulmonary nodules, and it is well-tolerated without increasing medical burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100268,"journal":{"name":"Clinical eHealth","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914123000321/pdfft?md5=c4ad0a244229464eb3797805fa4eb79c&pid=1-s2.0-S2588914123000321-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588914123000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, surgical resection was used as the first treatment. However, approximately 20% of patients were not suitable for surgery due to severe comorbidities. We verified the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of percutaneous thermal ablation for patients of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with peripheral high-risk pulmonary nodules in the real world. The patients with peripheral high-risk pulmonary nodules ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery who were ineligible or unwilling tosurgery underwent CT-guided thermal ablation in our hospital from January 1st, 2019 to May 31th, 2022 were retrospectively collected, and divided into COPD and non COPD group. Incidence, severity, risk factors of complications between in different severity of COPD and non-COPD group were compared. A total of 216 high-risk were enrolled, including 73 in COPD group and 143 in the non-COPD group. The average age, male gender, MMRC score, size of nodules, incidence of confirmed pathological diagnosis, and pneumothorax after thermal ablation were higher in the COPD group than in the non-COPD group. COPD was the only independent risk factor for pneumothorax after ablation. The incidence of pneumothorax increased with the severity of COPD, but no statistical significance. Compared to the baseline, the MMRC score was significantly increased in the COPD group, but there was no significant difference in the discharge time and hospitalization expenses between the COPD patients with or without pneumothorax. CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and feasible therapy for different severities of COPD with high-risk pulmonary nodules, and it is well-tolerated without increasing medical burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT引导下经皮热消融治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并恶性肺结节的可行性、安全性和耐受性
对于早期非小细胞肺癌,手术切除是首选治疗方法。然而,由于严重的合并症,大约20%的患者不适合手术。我们在现实世界中验证了经皮热消融治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)伴周围高危肺结节患者的可行性、安全性和耐受性。回顾性收集2019年1月1日至2022年5月31日在我院行ct引导热消融术的不适合或不愿意手术的外周高危肺结节患者,分为COPD组和非COPD组。比较不同严重程度COPD组与非COPD组的并发症发生率、严重程度及危险因素。共有216名高风险患者入组,其中慢性阻塞性肺病组73名,非慢性阻塞性肺病组143名。COPD组的平均年龄、男性、MMRC评分、结节大小、病理确诊发生率、热消融后气胸发生率均高于非COPD组。COPD是消融术后气胸的唯一独立危险因素。气胸发生率随COPD严重程度的增加而增加,但无统计学意义。与基线相比,COPD组MMRC评分显著升高,但合并气胸和不合并气胸的COPD患者出院时间和住院费用无显著差异。ct引导下经皮热消融对于不同严重程度的COPD合并高危肺结节是一种安全可行的治疗方法,且耐受性良好,不增加医疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“AI et al.” The perils of overreliance on Artificial Intelligence by authors in scientific research A systematic review of eHealth and mHealth interventions for lymphedema patients Machine learning and transfer learning techniques for accurate brain tumor classification Internet of Things in healthcare: An adaptive ethical framework for IoT in digital health IoMT Tsukamoto Type-2 fuzzy expert system for tuberculosis and Alzheimer’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1