EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SINTERING TECHNIQUES ON THE BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA (IN VITRO STUDY)

Mohamed Negm, Sanaa Abdel kader, Mona Mohy El Din
{"title":"EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SINTERING TECHNIQUES ON THE BIAXIAL FLEXURAL STRENGTH AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA (IN VITRO STUDY)","authors":"Mohamed Negm, Sanaa Abdel kader, Mona Mohy El Din","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2022.153969.1304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: For monolithic zirconia restorations to be a viable chair-side treatment option, recent studies are aiming to reduce the sintering time required without altering its properties. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the influence of high-speed sintering, speed sintering and conventional sintering on monolithic zirconia regarding bi-axial flexural strength, phase transformation and dimensional changes after sintering. METHODS: Thirty six monolithic zirconia disc specimens were prepared with the dimensions 12mm x 1.5mm and categorized into 3 groups (n=12) based on the sintering technique: High-speed sintering (HS: 1580 °C, total time is approximately 10 minutes) Speed sintering (SS: 1515 °C, total time is approximately 90 minutes), and Conventional sintering (CS, 1500 °C, total time is approximately 10 h). The ball on ring design was used to determine biaxial flexural strength (BFS). Dimensional changes after sintering was evaluated by digital micrometer (with an accuracy of 0.001 mm). The specimen's crystallography was investigated by x-ray diffraction technique (XRD). RESULTS: All groups exhibited a uniform sintering shrinkage of about 20% in all dimensions. Crystallographic analysis revealed only tetragonal and cubic characteristic peaks. BFS test results showed statistically insignificant difference between conventional (1105.5 ± 55.85MPa), speed (1078.3 ± 56.22 MPa), and high speed (1050.6±53.42 MPa) sintering cycles (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Speed and high speed cycles can be recommended for sintering of monolithic zirconia in order to reduce fixed prosthetic restoration fabrication times as the changes they induced were within the clinically acceptable ranges .","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2022.153969.1304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For monolithic zirconia restorations to be a viable chair-side treatment option, recent studies are aiming to reduce the sintering time required without altering its properties. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the influence of high-speed sintering, speed sintering and conventional sintering on monolithic zirconia regarding bi-axial flexural strength, phase transformation and dimensional changes after sintering. METHODS: Thirty six monolithic zirconia disc specimens were prepared with the dimensions 12mm x 1.5mm and categorized into 3 groups (n=12) based on the sintering technique: High-speed sintering (HS: 1580 °C, total time is approximately 10 minutes) Speed sintering (SS: 1515 °C, total time is approximately 90 minutes), and Conventional sintering (CS, 1500 °C, total time is approximately 10 h). The ball on ring design was used to determine biaxial flexural strength (BFS). Dimensional changes after sintering was evaluated by digital micrometer (with an accuracy of 0.001 mm). The specimen's crystallography was investigated by x-ray diffraction technique (XRD). RESULTS: All groups exhibited a uniform sintering shrinkage of about 20% in all dimensions. Crystallographic analysis revealed only tetragonal and cubic characteristic peaks. BFS test results showed statistically insignificant difference between conventional (1105.5 ± 55.85MPa), speed (1078.3 ± 56.22 MPa), and high speed (1050.6±53.42 MPa) sintering cycles (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Speed and high speed cycles can be recommended for sintering of monolithic zirconia in order to reduce fixed prosthetic restoration fabrication times as the changes they induced were within the clinically acceptable ranges .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同烧结技术对整体氧化锆双轴抗弯强度和晶体结构的影响(体外研究)
简介:为了使整体氧化锆修复体成为一种可行的椅子边处理选择,最近的研究旨在减少烧结时间而不改变其性能。目的:比较高速烧结、快速烧结和常规烧结对单片氧化锆的双轴抗折强度、烧结后的相变和尺寸变化的影响。方法:制备尺寸为12mm × 1.5mm的单片氧化锆圆盘试样36个,按烧结工艺分为高速烧结(HS: 1580°C,总时间约10分钟)、高速烧结(SS: 1515°C,总时间约90分钟)和常规烧结(CS: 1500°C,总时间约10小时)3组(n=12)。采用球环设计测定双轴抗折强度(BFS)。用数字千分尺测量烧结后的尺寸变化(精度为0.001 mm)。采用x射线衍射技术(XRD)对试样的晶体形貌进行了研究。结果:所有组在所有尺寸上均表现出约20%的均匀烧结收缩率。晶体分析显示只有四方和立方特征峰。BFS试验结果显示,常规烧结周期(1105.5±55.85MPa)、高速烧结周期(1078.3±56.22 MPa)和高速烧结周期(1050.6±53.42 MPa)之间差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:在临床可接受的范围内,可推荐高速循环烧结单片氧化锆,以减少固定修复体的制作次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microleakage Assessment Using Different Composite Application Techniques in Primary Molars. An In-Vitro Comparative Study “THERAPEUTIC EFFECT OF FLAXSEEDS ON OSTEOPOROSIS IN ALVEOLAR BONE OF RATS” EVALUATION OF BONE HEALING BY MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS IN RABBITS (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY) EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN MANDIBULAR MOLAR INTER-RADICULAR SEPTUM USING OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE (CLINICAL TRIAL) KIAA0101 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION IN DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA BETWEEN AMELOBLASTOMA AND AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1