Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Indian heart journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.004
Ramanathan Velayuthan, Suresh Kumar Sukumar, Dinakar Bootla, Sridhar Balaguru, Avinash Anantharaj, Santhosh Satheesh, Raja J. Selvaraj
{"title":"Pacing mode survival in patients with single chamber atrial pacemaker for sinus node dysfunction","authors":"Ramanathan Velayuthan,&nbsp;Suresh Kumar Sukumar,&nbsp;Dinakar Bootla,&nbsp;Sridhar Balaguru,&nbsp;Avinash Anantharaj,&nbsp;Santhosh Satheesh,&nbsp;Raja J. Selvaraj","doi":"10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Single chamber atrial pacemaker should be sufficient for patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) with normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. However, most patients undergo dual chamber pacemaker implantation because of concern of new onset AV block. The annual incidence of new AV block has been reported from 0.6 to 4.4 % in various studies.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Our aim is to assess mode survival in sinus node dysfunction with normal AV conduction patients implanted with AAIR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients who underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND with normal AV conduction between January 2014 and December 2021 were followed up for pacemaker device change, new onset AV block, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation (AF), lead complications, reoperation and mortality rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 113 patients underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND during the study period. Mean age was 55.6 ± 12.7 years. During a mean follow up of 48.7 ± 24.9 months, none of the patients required pacemaker device change to VVIR/DDDR. Nine patients underwent reoperation, 5 for lead dislodgment, 1 for high threshold, 1 for pocket site erosion and 3 for pulse generator change. None developed AV block or AF with slow ventricular rate. Only 4 patients developed AF (3 paroxysmal,1 permanent). There were 3 deaths during follow up and none were sudden deaths.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Single chamber atrial pacing is an acceptable mode of pacing in patients with SND in developing countries. Development of AV conduction abnormalities is rare in this relatively younger population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13384,"journal":{"name":"Indian heart journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"Pages 27-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001948322300473X/pdfft?md5=74211947ec8fab38a88f8511120f9045&pid=1-s2.0-S001948322300473X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001948322300473X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Single chamber atrial pacemaker should be sufficient for patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) with normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. However, most patients undergo dual chamber pacemaker implantation because of concern of new onset AV block. The annual incidence of new AV block has been reported from 0.6 to 4.4 % in various studies.

Objectives

Our aim is to assess mode survival in sinus node dysfunction with normal AV conduction patients implanted with AAIR.

Methods

Patients who underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND with normal AV conduction between January 2014 and December 2021 were followed up for pacemaker device change, new onset AV block, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation (AF), lead complications, reoperation and mortality rate.

Results

A total of 113 patients underwent single chamber atrial pacemaker implantation for SND during the study period. Mean age was 55.6 ± 12.7 years. During a mean follow up of 48.7 ± 24.9 months, none of the patients required pacemaker device change to VVIR/DDDR. Nine patients underwent reoperation, 5 for lead dislodgment, 1 for high threshold, 1 for pocket site erosion and 3 for pulse generator change. None developed AV block or AF with slow ventricular rate. Only 4 patients developed AF (3 paroxysmal,1 permanent). There were 3 deaths during follow up and none were sudden deaths.

Conclusion

Single chamber atrial pacing is an acceptable mode of pacing in patients with SND in developing countries. Development of AV conduction abnormalities is rare in this relatively younger population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单腔心房起搏器治疗窦房结功能障碍患者的起搏模式存活率
背景对于窦房结功能障碍(SND)且房室(AV)传导正常的患者来说,单腔心房起搏器就足够了。然而,由于担心新发房室传导阻滞,大多数患者都要接受双腔起搏器植入术。我们的目的是评估窦房结功能障碍且房室传导正常患者植入 AAIR 后的存活率。方法对 2014 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间因 SND 而接受单腔心房起搏器植入术且房室传导正常的患者进行随访,以了解起搏器装置更换、新发房室传导阻滞、束支传导阻滞、心房颤动(AF)、导联并发症、再次手术和死亡率等情况。平均年龄为 55.6 ± 12.7 岁。在平均 48.7 ± 24.9 个月的随访期间,没有患者需要将起搏器设备更换为 VVIR/DDDR。九名患者接受了再次手术,其中五人因导联脱落而再次手术,一人因高阈值而再次手术,一人因囊袋部位侵蚀而再次手术,三人因更换脉冲发生器而再次手术。没有人出现房室传导阻滞或心室率缓慢的房颤。只有 4 位患者出现房颤(3 位阵发性,1 位永久性)。结论单腔心房起搏是发展中国家 SND 患者可以接受的起搏方式。单腔心房起搏是发展中国家 SND 患者可以接受的起搏方式,在这一相对年轻的人群中很少出现房室传导异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian heart journal
Indian heart journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Indian Heart Journal (IHJ) is the official peer-reviewed open access journal of Cardiological Society of India and accepts articles for publication from across the globe. The journal aims to promote high quality research and serve as a platform for dissemination of scientific information in cardiology with particular focus on South Asia. The journal aims to publish cutting edge research in the field of clinical as well as non-clinical cardiology - including cardiovascular medicine and surgery. Some of the topics covered are Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery, Valvular Heart Disease, Pulmonary Hypertension and Infective Endocarditis. IHJ open access invites original research articles, research briefs, perspective, case reports, case vignette, cardiovascular images, cardiovascular graphics, research letters, correspondence, reader forum, and interesting photographs, for publication. IHJ open access also publishes theme-based special issues and abstracts of papers presented at the annual conference of the Cardiological Society of India.
期刊最新文献
Incidence of infective endocarditis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hypertonic saline in acute decompensated heart failure (HSHF). National experience of alcohol septal ablation in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A long-term multicenter retrospective study. Current Practices and Knowledge of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring among People with Hypertension: Insights from a Multicentric Study from North India. Psychological problems and burnout among healthcare workers: Impact of non-pharmacological lifestyle interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1