Evaluation of Rhizobial Inoculation in Comparison to Urea Fertilizer Application of Vegetable Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L)

Anuruddi Higk, Ekanayake Emhgs, Kumara Rkgk, SA Kulasooriya, Fonseka Dlck, H.I.G.K Anuruddi
{"title":"Evaluation of Rhizobial Inoculation in Comparison to Urea Fertilizer Application of Vegetable Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L)","authors":"Anuruddi Higk, Ekanayake Emhgs, Kumara Rkgk, SA Kulasooriya, Fonseka Dlck, H.I.G.K Anuruddi","doi":"10.4038/jur.v11i1.7987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of Rhizobium inoculation in comparison to nitrogen fertilizer (NF) application on vegetable bean in the Ankumbura area, Kandy district during the Maha 2018/19 season. Six treatments were employed comprising four NF levels (55, 110, 165, and 220 kg urea/ha), rhizobium inoculation without NF, and control with neither NF nor inoculant. The treatments were set out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Four NF levels were 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the recommended level for vegetable bean by the Department of Agriculture (DOA). All the treatments received potassium and phosphorous according to DOA recommendations. Pod yield/m2, growth parameters, several nodule parameters, and weed biomasses were recorded. Total yield (t/ha) was calculated based on the pod harvest. A yield versus fertilizer response curve was developed using calculated yield data. The highest total yield (3.03t/ha) with the application of 220kg/ha of urea was not significantly different from the yield produced under inoculation without NF (2.93 t/ha). This implies that inoculation facilitates a possible replacement of NF. Number of root nodules (30) and number of leaves (36) were significantly higher with inoculation. Higher levels; of 75% and 100% of recommended NF reduced nodule dry weight. Pod length, diameter, and dry weight with 100% and 75% NF levels were not significantly different (p<0.05) from those with inoculation. The highest pod N-yield (0.0586 g) and shoot N-yield (0.253 g) were recorded with inoculation and 220kg/ha urea application respectively. Weed biomass was significantly reduced (70%) with inoculation compared to the highest NF treatment. The results indicate a potential avenue to decrease the need for chemical nitrogen fertilizer and use inoculation to manage weed growth in vegetable beans in the Ankumbura area.","PeriodicalId":158329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the University of Ruhuna","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the University of Ruhuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/jur.v11i1.7987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of Rhizobium inoculation in comparison to nitrogen fertilizer (NF) application on vegetable bean in the Ankumbura area, Kandy district during the Maha 2018/19 season. Six treatments were employed comprising four NF levels (55, 110, 165, and 220 kg urea/ha), rhizobium inoculation without NF, and control with neither NF nor inoculant. The treatments were set out in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Four NF levels were 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the recommended level for vegetable bean by the Department of Agriculture (DOA). All the treatments received potassium and phosphorous according to DOA recommendations. Pod yield/m2, growth parameters, several nodule parameters, and weed biomasses were recorded. Total yield (t/ha) was calculated based on the pod harvest. A yield versus fertilizer response curve was developed using calculated yield data. The highest total yield (3.03t/ha) with the application of 220kg/ha of urea was not significantly different from the yield produced under inoculation without NF (2.93 t/ha). This implies that inoculation facilitates a possible replacement of NF. Number of root nodules (30) and number of leaves (36) were significantly higher with inoculation. Higher levels; of 75% and 100% of recommended NF reduced nodule dry weight. Pod length, diameter, and dry weight with 100% and 75% NF levels were not significantly different (p<0.05) from those with inoculation. The highest pod N-yield (0.0586 g) and shoot N-yield (0.253 g) were recorded with inoculation and 220kg/ha urea application respectively. Weed biomass was significantly reduced (70%) with inoculation compared to the highest NF treatment. The results indicate a potential avenue to decrease the need for chemical nitrogen fertilizer and use inoculation to manage weed growth in vegetable beans in the Ankumbura area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菜豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L)根瘤菌接种与施用尿素肥料的比较评估
本试验于2018/19 Maha季在康提县Ankumbura地区进行,比较了接种根瘤菌和氮肥对菜用豆的影响。6个处理包括4个氮肥水平(55、110、165和220 kg尿素/ha),不接种根瘤菌,不接种氮肥和不接种氮肥的对照。处理采用随机完全区组设计,设3个重复。四种NF水平分别是农业部(DOA)对菜豆的推荐水平的25%,50%,75%和100%。所有处理均按DOA建议施用钾和磷。记录了豆荚产量/m2、生长参数、几个根瘤参数和杂草生物量。总产量(t/ha)以豆荚收获量计算。利用计算的产量数据,建立了产量对肥料的响应曲线。施尿素220kg/ha的最高总产量(3.03t/ha)与不接种纳滤膜的最高总产量(2.93 t/ha)差异不显著。这意味着接种促进了NF的可能替代。接种后根瘤数(30个)和叶片数(36个)显著增加。高水平;75%和100%推荐NF减少结节干重。100%和75% NF水平下的荚果长、直径和干重与接种组无显著差异(p<0.05)。接种和施尿素220kg/ hm2时,豆荚氮产量最高(0.0586 g),地上部氮产量最高(0.253 g)。与最高NF处理相比,接种后杂草生物量显著减少(70%)。结果表明,在安昆布拉地区,减少化学氮肥的需要量和利用接种控制菜豆杂草生长是一条潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ideology in Critical Discourse Study: A Review of Literature Forecasting COVID-19 Daily Infected Cases in Sri Lanka by Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing Method Local Insights into Rural Tourism: A Study of Heeloya in the Knuckles Mountain Range Unravelling the Threads of Customer Loyalty: Motives Shaping Supermarket Patronage in Sri Lanka Impact of Cobalt-60 Gamma Irradiation on Growth, Development, and Morphology of Acalypha hispida (Cat’s Tail Plant)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1