Individual effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on the risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.66263
M. H. Makoui, Shiva Fekri, R. H. Makoui, Negar Ansari
{"title":"Individual effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on the risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"M. H. Makoui, Shiva Fekri, R. H. Makoui, Negar Ansari","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.66263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to understand the relationship between two specific genetic variations (GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms) and the risk of developing polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). PCOS is a common endocrinologic disorder that affects women. Oxidative stress may play a significant role in the development of PCOS. Certain enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, help protect cells against oxidative stress. However, previous research on the correlation between these specific genetic variations and PCOS risk has produced inconsistent findings. To address this, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the potential impact of these genetic variations on PCOS. We conducted a thorough search of the Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to find studies that met our criteria. We used fixed-effects or random-effects models to determine the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms related to PCOS. We also performed subgroup analyses based on ethnicity, mean age of participants, and PCOS diagnostic protocols. After screening, we found five studies with 1.607 participants (872 in the PCOS group and 735 in the control group) to be suitable for our meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were not linked to an increased risk of PCOS (OR: 0.925, 95% CI: 0.755-1.134; OR: 1.175, 95% CI: 0.614-2.247 respectively). Additionally, both Begg’s and Egger’s tests revealed no publishing bias. This meta-analysis confirmed that there is no association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and an increased risk of PCOS. However, further studies are required to validate this conclusion.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.66263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the relationship between two specific genetic variations (GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms) and the risk of developing polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). PCOS is a common endocrinologic disorder that affects women. Oxidative stress may play a significant role in the development of PCOS. Certain enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, help protect cells against oxidative stress. However, previous research on the correlation between these specific genetic variations and PCOS risk has produced inconsistent findings. To address this, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the potential impact of these genetic variations on PCOS. We conducted a thorough search of the Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases to find studies that met our criteria. We used fixed-effects or random-effects models to determine the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms related to PCOS. We also performed subgroup analyses based on ethnicity, mean age of participants, and PCOS diagnostic protocols. After screening, we found five studies with 1.607 participants (872 in the PCOS group and 735 in the control group) to be suitable for our meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were not linked to an increased risk of PCOS (OR: 0.925, 95% CI: 0.755-1.134; OR: 1.175, 95% CI: 0.614-2.247 respectively). Additionally, both Begg’s and Egger’s tests revealed no publishing bias. This meta-analysis confirmed that there is no association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and an increased risk of PCOS. However, further studies are required to validate this conclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GSTM1 和 GSTT1 多态性对多囊卵巢综合征风险的个体影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本研究旨在了解两种特定遗传变异(GSTT1和GSTM1多态性)与多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)发生风险之间的关系。多囊卵巢综合征是一种影响女性的常见内分泌疾病。氧化应激可能在PCOS的发生发展中起重要作用。某些酶,如谷胱甘肽s -转移酶,有助于保护细胞免受氧化应激。然而,先前对这些特定遗传变异与多囊卵巢综合征风险之间相关性的研究得出了不一致的结果。为了解决这个问题,进行了一项荟萃分析,以检查这些遗传变异对多囊卵巢综合征的潜在影响。我们对Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库进行了彻底的搜索,以找到符合我们标准的研究。我们使用固定效应或随机效应模型来确定与PCOS相关的GSTT1和GSTM1多态性的合并优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。我们还根据种族、参与者的平均年龄和多囊卵巢综合征诊断方案进行了亚组分析。筛选后,我们发现有5项研究有1.607名参与者(PCOS组872名,对照组735名)适合我们的荟萃分析。我们的分析显示,GSTM1和GSTT1零基因型与PCOS风险增加无关(OR: 0.925, 95% CI: 0.755-1.134;OR: 1.175, 95% CI: 0.614-2.247)。此外,Begg和Egger的测试都没有显示出发表偏倚。该荟萃分析证实GSTM1和GSTT1多态性与PCOS风险增加之间没有关联。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这一结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Prevalence and predictors of hand hygiene compliance in clinical, surgical and intensive care unit wards: results of a second cross-sectional study at the Umberto I teaching hospital of Rome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1