Digital assessment of positional accuracy of different splinting multiimplant impression techniques: An in vitro comparative study

Ahmed Awaad, Akram Neena, Faten Abbas
{"title":"Digital assessment of positional accuracy of different splinting multiimplant impression techniques: An in vitro comparative study","authors":"Ahmed Awaad, Akram Neena, Faten Abbas","doi":"10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150446.1297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Splinting of multiple implants during impression with the most accurate material to reproduce their intraoral relationship is deemed necessary for achieving passively fitting prosthesis. OBJECTIVES: To assess positional accuracy of multiimplant impressions for completely edentulous arches obtained by a 3D printed splint and compare the results obtained with those obtained with conventional methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS. One mandibular epoxy model with 4 parallel implants was used as master reference model. A total of 24 (n=24) open tray impressions were done using a custom-made tray and were poured in dental stone. Eight impressions were done with 3D printed splint (group I), 8 were done with the conventional splinting method (group II), and 8 were done with sectional splinting method (group III). Four impression posts were attached to each cast, and all casts were scanned using a desktop scanner. Surface scans for the 3 groups were superimposed with the scan of the master reference model. The positional accuracy of each post was compared with the reference model to assess positional deviations. RESULTS: Models of group I showed lower positional deviation compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the 3 impression techniques regarding positional accuracy of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed splint method can be used as an alternative to conventional splinting techniques.","PeriodicalId":7723,"journal":{"name":"Alexandria Dental Journal","volume":" 53","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alexandria Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2022.150446.1297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Splinting of multiple implants during impression with the most accurate material to reproduce their intraoral relationship is deemed necessary for achieving passively fitting prosthesis. OBJECTIVES: To assess positional accuracy of multiimplant impressions for completely edentulous arches obtained by a 3D printed splint and compare the results obtained with those obtained with conventional methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS. One mandibular epoxy model with 4 parallel implants was used as master reference model. A total of 24 (n=24) open tray impressions were done using a custom-made tray and were poured in dental stone. Eight impressions were done with 3D printed splint (group I), 8 were done with the conventional splinting method (group II), and 8 were done with sectional splinting method (group III). Four impression posts were attached to each cast, and all casts were scanned using a desktop scanner. Surface scans for the 3 groups were superimposed with the scan of the master reference model. The positional accuracy of each post was compared with the reference model to assess positional deviations. RESULTS: Models of group I showed lower positional deviation compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the 3 impression techniques regarding positional accuracy of the implants. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printed splint method can be used as an alternative to conventional splinting techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不同夹板多种植体印模技术的定位精度进行数字化评估:体外比较研究
简介:在印模期间用最准确的材料夹板固定多个种植体以复制其口腔内关系被认为是实现被动拟合假体的必要条件。目的:评估由3D打印夹板获得的全无牙弓多种植体印模的位置准确性,并将获得的结果与传统方法获得的结果进行比较。材料和方法。采用1个下颌骨环氧树脂模型和4个平行种植体作为主参考模型。共24例(n=24)开盘印模使用定制的牙盘完成,并倒入牙石中。采用3D打印夹板进行8例压模(I组),采用常规夹板方法进行8例压模(II组),采用分段式夹板方法进行8例压模(III组)。每个铸型固定4个压模桩,使用桌面扫描仪扫描所有铸型。3组的表面扫描与主参考模型的扫描叠加。将每个岗位的位置精度与参考模型进行比较,以评估位置偏差。结果:与其他组相比,1组模型的位置偏差较小。三种压印技术在种植体定位精度方面无统计学差异。结论:3D打印夹板方法可作为传统夹板技术的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microleakage Assessment Using Different Composite Application Techniques in Primary Molars. An In-Vitro Comparative Study “THERAPEUTIC EFFECT OF FLAXSEEDS ON OSTEOPOROSIS IN ALVEOLAR BONE OF RATS” EVALUATION OF BONE HEALING BY MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS IN RABBITS (AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY) EVALUATION OF THE STABILITY OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN MANDIBULAR MOLAR INTER-RADICULAR SEPTUM USING OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE (CLINICAL TRIAL) KIAA0101 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL EXPRESSION IN DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA BETWEEN AMELOBLASTOMA AND AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1