“Death in his hand”

IF 0.2 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.179
Chris Murray
{"title":"“Death in his hand”","authors":"Chris Murray","doi":"10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chris Murray, “‘Death in his hand’: Theories of Apparitions in Coleridge, Ferriar, and Keats” (pp. 179–210)\n On a chance meeting in 1819, Samuel Taylor Coleridge told John Keats about his theory of “double touch.” This hypothesis is key to the famous accounts in which each poet mythologizes the other. In his writings on double touch, Coleridge surmises that we engage with our world simultaneously by sensory perception and an energetic connection derived from Mesmerism. Disruption to either aspect of double touch results in the pathological state of “single touch,” symptoms of which can include hallucination. Coleridge developed his theory in dialogue with physician and author John Ferriar. Each theorized that ghost-sightings occur when the mind articulates disease as strong imagery and each used literature, particularly Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1603), as a source of evidence for psychological speculations. Coleridge’s double-touch theory pervades his notebooks and his lectures on drama, and his verbal account provided Keats with a new means to explore the supernatural in narrative verse. Hence, double touch receives its most significant literary treatment in Keats’s compositions over the weeks following his conversation with Coleridge. In particular, “La Belle Dame sans Merci” (1819) proceeds from an initial impulse to parody Coleridge to a serious exploration of double touch. Conversely, Coleridge’s claim to have foretold Keats’s death is influenced by double-touch theory and “La Belle Dame sans Merci.”","PeriodicalId":54037,"journal":{"name":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2023.78.3.179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chris Murray, “‘Death in his hand’: Theories of Apparitions in Coleridge, Ferriar, and Keats” (pp. 179–210) On a chance meeting in 1819, Samuel Taylor Coleridge told John Keats about his theory of “double touch.” This hypothesis is key to the famous accounts in which each poet mythologizes the other. In his writings on double touch, Coleridge surmises that we engage with our world simultaneously by sensory perception and an energetic connection derived from Mesmerism. Disruption to either aspect of double touch results in the pathological state of “single touch,” symptoms of which can include hallucination. Coleridge developed his theory in dialogue with physician and author John Ferriar. Each theorized that ghost-sightings occur when the mind articulates disease as strong imagery and each used literature, particularly Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1603), as a source of evidence for psychological speculations. Coleridge’s double-touch theory pervades his notebooks and his lectures on drama, and his verbal account provided Keats with a new means to explore the supernatural in narrative verse. Hence, double touch receives its most significant literary treatment in Keats’s compositions over the weeks following his conversation with Coleridge. In particular, “La Belle Dame sans Merci” (1819) proceeds from an initial impulse to parody Coleridge to a serious exploration of double touch. Conversely, Coleridge’s claim to have foretold Keats’s death is influenced by double-touch theory and “La Belle Dame sans Merci.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"死在他手中"
“死亡在他手中”:柯勒律治、费里亚和济慈的幻影理论(第179-210页)在1819年的一次偶然会面中,塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治向约翰·济慈讲述了他的“双重接触”理论。这一假设是著名的叙述的关键,在这些叙述中,每个诗人都把对方神话化。在他关于双重接触的著作中,柯勒律治推测,我们通过感官知觉和来自催眠术的能量联系同时与我们的世界接触。双触的任何一个方面的破坏都会导致“单触”的病理状态,其症状可能包括幻觉。柯勒律治在与医生兼作家约翰·费里亚的对话中发展了他的理论。两种理论都认为,当大脑将疾病作为强烈的意象清晰地表达出来时,就会出现鬼魂目击,而且两种理论都使用文学作品,尤其是莎士比亚的《哈姆雷特》(1603),作为心理学推测的证据来源。柯勒律治的双重触碰理论贯穿于他的笔记和戏剧讲座中,他的口头叙述为济慈提供了一种探索叙事诗中超自然现象的新方法。因此,在济慈与柯勒律治谈话后的几个星期里,他的作品中出现了最重要的文学处理。尤其是1819年的《美丽的圣母院》(La Belle Dame sans Merci),从最初模仿柯勒律治(Coleridge)的冲动发展到对双重手法的严肃探索。相反,柯勒律治声称预言了济慈的死亡,这是受到了双重触碰理论和《美丽的Dame sans Merci》的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: From Ozymandias to Huckleberry Finn, Nineteenth-Century Literature unites a broad-based group of transatlantic authors and poets, literary characters, and discourses - all discussed with a keen understanding of nineteenth -century literary history and theory. The major journal for publication of new research in its field, Nineteenth-Century Literature features articles that span across disciplines and explore themes in gender, history, military studies, psychology, cultural studies, and urbanism. The journal also reviews annually over 70 volumes of scholarship, criticism, comparative studies, and new editions of nineteenth-century English and American literature.
期刊最新文献
Review: Feminine Singularity: The Politics of Subjectivity in Nineteenth-Century Literature, by Ronjaunee Chatterjee Review: Narrating Trauma: Victorian Novels and Modern Stress Disorders, by Gretchen Braun Review: Conversing in Verse: Conversation in Nineteenth-Century English Poetry, by Elizabeth K. Helsinger Beatrice Cenci’s Ghost Review: American Mediterraneans: A Study in Geography, History, and Race, by Susan Gillman
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1