A bird's eye view of the mental health systems in India

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Indian Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_845_23
S. Suhas, B. Arvind, G. Sukumar, Pradeep S Banandur, Lakshmi P. Nirisha, C. Kumar, V. Benegal, Girish N. Rao, Mathew Varghese, G. Gururaj
{"title":"A bird's eye view of the mental health systems in India","authors":"S. Suhas, B. Arvind, G. Sukumar, Pradeep S Banandur, Lakshmi P. Nirisha, C. Kumar, V. Benegal, Girish N. Rao, Mathew Varghese, G. Gururaj","doi":"10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_845_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n A staggering 85% of the global population resides in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs). India stands as an exemplary pioneer in the realm of mental health initiatives among LAMICs, having launched its National Mental Health Program in 1982. It is imperative to effectively evaluate mental health systems periodically to cultivate a dynamic learning model sustained through continuous feedback from mental healthcare structures and processes.\n \n \n \n The National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) embarked on the Mental Health Systems Assessment (MHSA) in 12 representative Indian states, following a pilot program that contextually adapted the World Health Organization's Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems. The methodology involved data collection from various sources and interviews with key stakeholders, yielding a set of 15 quantitative, 5 morbidity, and 10 qualitative indicators, which were employed to encapsulate the functional status of mental health systems within the surveyed states by using a scorecard framework.\n \n \n \n The NMHS MHSA for the year 2015–16 unveiled an array of indices, and the resultant scorecard succinctly encapsulated the outcomes of the systems' evaluation across the 12 surveyed states in India. Significantly, the findings revealed considerable interstate disparities, with some states such as Gujarat and Kerala emerging as frontrunners in the evaluation among the surveyed states. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified in several domains within the assessed mental health systems.\n \n \n \n MHSA, as conducted within the framework of NMHS, emerges as a dependable, valid, and holistic mechanism for documenting mental health systems in India. However, this process necessitates periodic iterations to serve as critical indicators guiding the national mental health agenda, including policies, programs, and their impact evaluation.\n","PeriodicalId":13345,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"4 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_845_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A staggering 85% of the global population resides in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs). India stands as an exemplary pioneer in the realm of mental health initiatives among LAMICs, having launched its National Mental Health Program in 1982. It is imperative to effectively evaluate mental health systems periodically to cultivate a dynamic learning model sustained through continuous feedback from mental healthcare structures and processes. The National Mental Health Survey (NMHS) embarked on the Mental Health Systems Assessment (MHSA) in 12 representative Indian states, following a pilot program that contextually adapted the World Health Organization's Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems. The methodology involved data collection from various sources and interviews with key stakeholders, yielding a set of 15 quantitative, 5 morbidity, and 10 qualitative indicators, which were employed to encapsulate the functional status of mental health systems within the surveyed states by using a scorecard framework. The NMHS MHSA for the year 2015–16 unveiled an array of indices, and the resultant scorecard succinctly encapsulated the outcomes of the systems' evaluation across the 12 surveyed states in India. Significantly, the findings revealed considerable interstate disparities, with some states such as Gujarat and Kerala emerging as frontrunners in the evaluation among the surveyed states. Nevertheless, notable gaps were identified in several domains within the assessed mental health systems. MHSA, as conducted within the framework of NMHS, emerges as a dependable, valid, and holistic mechanism for documenting mental health systems in India. However, this process necessitates periodic iterations to serve as critical indicators guiding the national mental health agenda, including policies, programs, and their impact evaluation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸟瞰印度的精神卫生系统
令人震惊的是,全球85%的人口居住在低收入和中等收入国家。印度于1982年启动了国家精神卫生方案,是拉美和加勒比国家精神卫生倡议领域的典范先驱。必须定期有效地评估精神卫生系统,以培养一种动态学习模型,通过精神卫生保健结构和过程的持续反馈来维持。全国精神卫生调查(NMHS)在印度12个有代表性的邦开展了精神卫生系统评估(MHSA),此前开展了一项试点计划,该计划在背景上适应了世界卫生组织的《精神卫生系统评估工具》。该方法涉及从各种来源收集数据并与主要利益相关者进行访谈,产生一套15个定量指标、5个发病率指标和10个定性指标,通过使用记分卡框架,这些指标用于概括被调查州内精神卫生系统的功能状况。NMHS 2015-16年度MHSA公布了一系列指数,由此产生的记分卡简洁地概括了印度12个被调查州的系统评估结果。值得注意的是,调查结果揭示了相当大的州际差异,古吉拉特邦和喀拉拉邦等一些邦在被调查邦的评估中脱颖而出。然而,在评估的精神卫生系统中,在几个领域发现了明显的差距。在NMHS框架内开展的MHSA成为记录印度精神卫生系统的可靠、有效和全面的机制。然而,这一过程需要定期迭代,以作为指导国家精神卫生议程的关键指标,包括政策、方案及其影响评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Psychiatry
Indian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychiatry (ISSN 0019-5545), is an official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society. It is published Bimonthly with one additional supplement (total 5 issues). The IJP publishes original work in all the fields of psychiatry. All papers are peer-reviewed before publication. The issues are published Bimonthly. An additional supplement is also published annually. Articles can be submitted online from www.journalonweb.com . The journal provides immediate free access to all the published articles. The journal does not charge the authors for submission, processing or publication of the articles.
期刊最新文献
Amend the Mental Health Care Act 2017: A Survey of Indian psychiatrists (Part 2). Amisulpride-induced myoclonus: A unique tardive syndrome. Diagnostic overshadowing in psychiatry: A case report. Effects of aerobic training on brain architecture, hippocampal volume, cardiorespiratory parameters, and health-related quality of life among patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review. Efficacy of brief cognitive behavior therapy in improving symptoms, functioning, and adherence to treatment in patients with bipolar disorder in remission: A randomized control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1