The Value of Implementing a Digital Approach in the Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patient Pathway: A Spanish Example

Sara Correia , Monica Gonzalez , Melike Deger , Peter Pitts
{"title":"The Value of Implementing a Digital Approach in the Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patient Pathway: A Spanish Example","authors":"Sara Correia ,&nbsp;Monica Gonzalez ,&nbsp;Melike Deger ,&nbsp;Peter Pitts","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, non-adherence is common and costly. The COVID-19 pandemic required the use of novel solutions to ensure service provision and quality of care. This retrospective analysis determined the impact and value of a digital versus standard pathway for the management of OSA in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A time-driven activity-based costing approach was applied to OSA management over 1 year using a standard or digital pathway. The standard pathway included face-to-face appointments at the time of diagnosis, then after 1–3 months and every 6 months thereafter. The digital pathway had fewer face-to-face appointments and utilised telemonitoring. A cost analysis was performed to determine the per-patient cost per healthcare professional (HCP) for a digital pathway for therapy implementation and follow-up compared with the standard pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with the standard pathway, the digital pathway decreased the waiting list time from 18 to 2 months, the overall pathway time from 12 to 6 months, HCP cost per patient from €95 to €85, and number of hospital appointments per patient from 6 to 3.1. Furthermore, CPAP device usage improved from 5.7 to 6.3<!--> <!-->h/night and the proportion of individuals defined as adherent increased from 79% to 91%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Implementation of digital processes using available technology reduced HCP time and costs, and improved adherence to CPAP in people with OSA. Greater utilisation of a digital pathway could improve access to therapy, allow personalised patient management, and facilitate better clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"6 1","pages":"Article 100289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663623000759/pdfft?md5=6d5a4e6105211d5c88ffefa9b39abbc0&pid=1-s2.0-S2659663623000759-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663623000759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, non-adherence is common and costly. The COVID-19 pandemic required the use of novel solutions to ensure service provision and quality of care. This retrospective analysis determined the impact and value of a digital versus standard pathway for the management of OSA in Spain.

Methods

A time-driven activity-based costing approach was applied to OSA management over 1 year using a standard or digital pathway. The standard pathway included face-to-face appointments at the time of diagnosis, then after 1–3 months and every 6 months thereafter. The digital pathway had fewer face-to-face appointments and utilised telemonitoring. A cost analysis was performed to determine the per-patient cost per healthcare professional (HCP) for a digital pathway for therapy implementation and follow-up compared with the standard pathway.

Results

Compared with the standard pathway, the digital pathway decreased the waiting list time from 18 to 2 months, the overall pathway time from 12 to 6 months, HCP cost per patient from €95 to €85, and number of hospital appointments per patient from 6 to 3.1. Furthermore, CPAP device usage improved from 5.7 to 6.3 h/night and the proportion of individuals defined as adherent increased from 79% to 91%.

Conclusions

Implementation of digital processes using available technology reduced HCP time and costs, and improved adherence to CPAP in people with OSA. Greater utilisation of a digital pathway could improve access to therapy, allow personalised patient management, and facilitate better clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者治疗路径中实施数字化方法的价值:西班牙范例
导言连续气道正压(CPAP)是治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的金标准疗法。然而,不坚持治疗的现象很普遍,而且成本高昂。COVID-19 大流行需要使用新的解决方案来确保服务的提供和护理质量。这项回顾性分析确定了数字化路径与标准路径对西班牙 OSA 管理的影响和价值。方法采用标准路径或数字化路径对 OSA 进行为期 1 年的管理,并采用时间驱动活动成本法。标准路径包括诊断时的面对面预约,1-3 个月后的面对面预约,以及之后每 6 个月的面对面预约。数字化路径则减少了面对面的预约,并采用了远程监测。结果与标准路径相比,数字化路径的候诊时间从 18 个月缩短至 2 个月,整体路径时间从 12 个月缩短至 6 个月,每位患者的医护人员成本从 95 欧元降至 85 欧元,每位患者的医院预约次数从 6 次降至 3.1 次。此外,CPAP 设备的使用时间从 5.7 小时/晚提高到 6.3 小时/晚,被定义为坚持使用 CPAP 的患者比例从 79% 提高到 91%。更多地利用数字化路径可以改善治疗的可及性,实现个性化的患者管理,并促进更好的临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
COPD With Comorbidities: A Clinical and Organizational Challenge for the 21st Century Use of Rifampicin as a Cytochrome Inducer in Acute Tacrolimus Poisoning SeparSEPAR (Sociedad Española de Neumologia y Cirugía Torácica) Clinical Protocol on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Severe Emphysema Erratum to “MEntA Program Based on Motivational Interview to Improve Adherence to Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP): A Randomized Controlled Trial” [Open Respiratory Archives. 2021;3(2):100088] Unusual Bronchoscopic Findings in Endobronchial Sarcoidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1