Higher Education Instructor Perception of Helpfulness of Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Online Learning Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.24059/olj.v27i4.4019
Florence Martin, Beth Oyarzun, Ayesha Sadaf
{"title":"Higher Education Instructor Perception of Helpfulness of Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies","authors":"Florence Martin, Beth Oyarzun, Ayesha Sadaf","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i4.4019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online learners are increasingly diverse (NCES, 2022), which underlines the need for instructors to be inclusive and equitable in online teaching. Inclusion refers to providing opportunities for all learners in the online course, so they can actively participate and feel welcomed and belong in the course, and equity ensures that all learners have fair treatment and access to the opportunities and resources needed to succeed. In this survey-based research, we developed an Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies (IEOTS) instrument with 45 strategies and examined instructor perceptions of the helpfulness of these strategies. These strategies focused on instructor self-awareness and commitment, getting to know the learners, course design, course facilitation, and evaluation. Based on the 478 online instructor survey responses, descriptive statistics showed that the instructors rated the strategies between somewhat helpful and helpful. In the open-ended question, student choice was described as an important aspect of the online course being inclusive and equitable. Analysis conducted based on the learner (student level), instructor (gender, ethnicity, teaching experience and teaching expertise),  course (delivery modality), and organizational differences (required training,  collaboration with instructional designer) found that instructor perceptions of helpfulness was higher for the course design subscale for instructors who taught online asynchronously rather than  synchronously; higher for the know your learner subscale for instructors who taught graduate students rather than those who taught undergraduate students,  and between those who attended training for online teaching compared to those who had not. In addition to supporting diverse online students, this study has implications for online instructors, instructional designers, and administrators who provide support to integrate these strategies effectively.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i4.4019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online learners are increasingly diverse (NCES, 2022), which underlines the need for instructors to be inclusive and equitable in online teaching. Inclusion refers to providing opportunities for all learners in the online course, so they can actively participate and feel welcomed and belong in the course, and equity ensures that all learners have fair treatment and access to the opportunities and resources needed to succeed. In this survey-based research, we developed an Inclusive and Equitable Online Teaching Strategies (IEOTS) instrument with 45 strategies and examined instructor perceptions of the helpfulness of these strategies. These strategies focused on instructor self-awareness and commitment, getting to know the learners, course design, course facilitation, and evaluation. Based on the 478 online instructor survey responses, descriptive statistics showed that the instructors rated the strategies between somewhat helpful and helpful. In the open-ended question, student choice was described as an important aspect of the online course being inclusive and equitable. Analysis conducted based on the learner (student level), instructor (gender, ethnicity, teaching experience and teaching expertise),  course (delivery modality), and organizational differences (required training,  collaboration with instructional designer) found that instructor perceptions of helpfulness was higher for the course design subscale for instructors who taught online asynchronously rather than  synchronously; higher for the know your learner subscale for instructors who taught graduate students rather than those who taught undergraduate students,  and between those who attended training for online teaching compared to those who had not. In addition to supporting diverse online students, this study has implications for online instructors, instructional designers, and administrators who provide support to integrate these strategies effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校教师对包容性和公平性在线教学策略帮助性的看法
在线学习者越来越多样化(NCES, 2022),这凸显了教师在在线教学中包容和公平的必要性。包容性是指在网络课程中为所有的学习者提供机会,使他们能够积极参与,并在课程中感受到欢迎和归属感;公平性是指所有的学习者都能得到公平的对待,获得成功所需的机会和资源。在这项基于调查的研究中,我们开发了一个包含45个策略的包容和公平在线教学策略(IEOTS)工具,并检查了教师对这些策略的帮助性的看法。这些策略侧重于教师的自我意识和承诺、了解学习者、课程设计、课程促进和评估。根据478名在线教师的调查反馈,描述性统计显示,教师对策略的评价在“有点帮助”和“有用”之间。在开放式问题中,学生的选择被描述为在线课程包容性和公平性的一个重要方面。基于学习者(学生水平)、教师(性别、种族、教学经验和教学专业知识)、课程(交付方式)和组织差异(所需培训、与教学设计师合作)进行的分析发现,在课程设计子量表上,异步在线教学的教师对乐于助人的看法高于同步在线教学的教师;教授研究生的教师比教授本科生的教师更了解学习者,参加过在线教学培训的教师比没有参加过在线教学培训的教师更了解学习者。除了支持不同的在线学生外,本研究还对在线教师、教学设计师和提供支持的管理员有效地整合这些策略具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergent Themes from Study of a Highly Flexible Hybrid Learning Program Culturally- and Linguistically-Responsive Online Teacher Learning Professional Development "I Sing the Body Electric": Embodied Presence in the Community of Inquiry Framework Measuring Faculty Engagement in Online Formative or Whole-Person Education “But They’re Grad Students, They Should Know This”: Preliminary Findings from a Writing Center’s Hybrid Approach to Supporting Postgraduates in Qatar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1