A novel nanosized FePO4 fertilizer is as effective as triple superphosphate in sustaining the growth of cucumber plants

IF 7.3 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Pedosphere Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.12.005
Andrea CIURLI , Laura GIAGNONI , Davide SEGA , Roberta PASTORELLI , Zeno VARANINI , Giancarlo RENELLA , Anita ZAMBONI
{"title":"A novel nanosized FePO4 fertilizer is as effective as triple superphosphate in sustaining the growth of cucumber plants","authors":"Andrea CIURLI ,&nbsp;Laura GIAGNONI ,&nbsp;Davide SEGA ,&nbsp;Roberta PASTORELLI ,&nbsp;Zeno VARANINI ,&nbsp;Giancarlo RENELLA ,&nbsp;Anita ZAMBONI","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behaviour of nanofertilizers (NFs) in plant-soil systems can differ from that of conventional chemical fertilizers due to their peculiar chemical-physical properties. Their effectiveness is still poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the P fertilization potential of a novel nanosized FePO<sub>4</sub> NF (FePNF) in a plant-soil microcosm in a pot experiment. The efficacies of FePNF and a conventional P fertilizer (triple superphosphate, TSP) in sustaining the growth of cucumber plants were evaluated. Plants were grown for 28 d on a P-deficient soil, and determinations were made of plant growth parameters, mineral nutrient concentrations in plant tissues, P availability in soil, activities of soil enzymes involved in C, N, P, and S mineralization, and soil microbial community structure. No significant differences were found in plant dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll content, or root growth between the FePNF and TSP treatments. Conversely, P availability in soil and P concentration in plant tissues at the end of the plant growth period were significantly higher after TSP fertilization compared to FePNF fertilization, whereas no significant differences were observed for other nutrients. Among the measured soil enzyme activities, there were no significant differences in the activities of soil acid phosphatase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase between the FePNF and TSP treatments, while soil alkaline phosphatase activity was higher in the TSP treatment than in the FePNF treatment and the protease activity was higher in the FePNF treatment than in the TSP treatment. The FePNF and TSP treatments showed significant differences in soil archaeal, bacterial, and fungal community structures, although the microbial community profiles generally clustered closer to each other in the two treatments. We concluded that FePNF can be an efficient alternative to the conventional P fertilizer TSP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 405-414"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S100201602300125X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behaviour of nanofertilizers (NFs) in plant-soil systems can differ from that of conventional chemical fertilizers due to their peculiar chemical-physical properties. Their effectiveness is still poorly understood. In this study, we evaluated the P fertilization potential of a novel nanosized FePO4 NF (FePNF) in a plant-soil microcosm in a pot experiment. The efficacies of FePNF and a conventional P fertilizer (triple superphosphate, TSP) in sustaining the growth of cucumber plants were evaluated. Plants were grown for 28 d on a P-deficient soil, and determinations were made of plant growth parameters, mineral nutrient concentrations in plant tissues, P availability in soil, activities of soil enzymes involved in C, N, P, and S mineralization, and soil microbial community structure. No significant differences were found in plant dry weight, leaf area, chlorophyll content, or root growth between the FePNF and TSP treatments. Conversely, P availability in soil and P concentration in plant tissues at the end of the plant growth period were significantly higher after TSP fertilization compared to FePNF fertilization, whereas no significant differences were observed for other nutrients. Among the measured soil enzyme activities, there were no significant differences in the activities of soil acid phosphatase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase between the FePNF and TSP treatments, while soil alkaline phosphatase activity was higher in the TSP treatment than in the FePNF treatment and the protease activity was higher in the FePNF treatment than in the TSP treatment. The FePNF and TSP treatments showed significant differences in soil archaeal, bacterial, and fungal community structures, although the microbial community profiles generally clustered closer to each other in the two treatments. We concluded that FePNF can be an efficient alternative to the conventional P fertilizer TSP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型纳米磷酸铁肥料在维持黄瓜植株生长方面与三过磷酸钙同样有效
纳米肥料(NFs)由于其特殊的化学物理性质,在植物-土壤系统中的行为可能与传统的化学肥料不同。人们对它们的有效性仍然知之甚少。在盆栽试验中,我们评估了新型纳米FePO4 NF (FePNF)在植物-土壤微观环境中的施磷潜力。比较了FePNF与常规磷肥(三磷酸过磷酸钾,TSP)对黄瓜植株的维持生长效果。植物在缺磷土壤上生长28 d,测定植物生长参数、植物组织中矿质养分浓度、土壤磷有效性、参与C、N、P、S矿化的土壤酶活性以及土壤微生物群落结构。FePNF和TSP处理在植株干重、叶面积、叶绿素含量和根系生长方面均无显著差异。相反,施用TSP后,土壤磷有效性和植物生长末期组织磷浓度显著高于施用FePNF,而其他养分间差异不显著。在土壤酶活性测定中,土壤酸性磷酸酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和芳基磺化酶活性在FePNF和TSP处理之间无显著差异,而土壤碱性磷酸酶活性在TSP处理中高于FePNF处理,蛋白酶活性在FePNF处理中高于TSP处理。FePNF和TSP处理在土壤古细菌、细菌和真菌群落结构上存在显著差异,但两种处理的微生物群落分布总体上更接近。结果表明,FePNF可作为传统磷肥TSP的有效替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedosphere
Pedosphere 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
5.0 months
期刊介绍: PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.
期刊最新文献
An index for characterizing bioavailability and risk of metals in soil-vegetable systems Advanced soil conservation for African drylands: From erosion models to management theories Assessment of microbial carbon use efficiency in China's agroecosystem based on enzyme stoichiometry: A meta-analysis Harnessing microbe-based soil inoculants, strigolactones and nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture: Mechanisms, innovations and challenges Environmental and human health impacts of neonicotinoid insecticides: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1