Structural and functional properties of foundation species (mussels vs. seaweeds) predict functional aspects of the associated communities

IF 1.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Community Ecology Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5
Nicole M. Cameron, Ricardo A. Scrosati, Nelson Valdivia
{"title":"Structural and functional properties of foundation species (mussels vs. seaweeds) predict functional aspects of the associated communities","authors":"Nicole M. Cameron, Ricardo A. Scrosati, Nelson Valdivia","doi":"10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foundation species are spatially dominant species that increase habitat complexity and provide substrate and shelter for many smaller species. Through a mensurative field experiment, we tested the hypothesis that functional aspects of the associated communities are related to structural and functional properties of the foundation species. Specifically, we contrasted invertebrate communities living in mussel (<i>Mytilus</i>) and seaweed (<i>Chondrus</i>) stands from the same rocky intertidal environments in Atlantic Canada. Both stands reach similar heights above the substrate, but they differ structurally (rigid mussel shells vs. flexible seaweed fronds) and functionally (mussels generate biowaste while seaweeds offer food for herbivores). Our data supported the hypothesis in various ways. Detritivory (mostly by oligochaetes) was more prevalent in mussel stands, while herbivory was more prevalent in seaweed stands. Predators were mostly mites and, consequently, they were more prevalent in mussel stands, as mites eat oligochaetes. Functional traits related to body and mobility types were also related to properties of the foundation species. Overall, we conclude that structural and functional properties of foundation species can predict functional aspects of the associated communities. This concept may help to develop effective restoration strategies after the loss of foundation species due to anthropogenic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50994,"journal":{"name":"Community Ecology","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-023-00171-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foundation species are spatially dominant species that increase habitat complexity and provide substrate and shelter for many smaller species. Through a mensurative field experiment, we tested the hypothesis that functional aspects of the associated communities are related to structural and functional properties of the foundation species. Specifically, we contrasted invertebrate communities living in mussel (Mytilus) and seaweed (Chondrus) stands from the same rocky intertidal environments in Atlantic Canada. Both stands reach similar heights above the substrate, but they differ structurally (rigid mussel shells vs. flexible seaweed fronds) and functionally (mussels generate biowaste while seaweeds offer food for herbivores). Our data supported the hypothesis in various ways. Detritivory (mostly by oligochaetes) was more prevalent in mussel stands, while herbivory was more prevalent in seaweed stands. Predators were mostly mites and, consequently, they were more prevalent in mussel stands, as mites eat oligochaetes. Functional traits related to body and mobility types were also related to properties of the foundation species. Overall, we conclude that structural and functional properties of foundation species can predict functional aspects of the associated communities. This concept may help to develop effective restoration strategies after the loss of foundation species due to anthropogenic factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础物种(贻贝与海藻)的结构和功能特性可预测相关群落的功能方面
基础种是空间优势种,增加了生境的复杂性,并为许多较小的物种提供了基质和庇护所。通过野外测量实验,我们验证了相关群落的功能方面与基础种的结构和功能特性有关的假设。具体来说,我们比较了生活在加拿大大西洋相同的岩石潮间带环境中的贻贝(Mytilus)和海藻(Chondrus)中的无脊椎动物群落。这两个支架在基质上的高度相似,但它们在结构上(坚硬的贻贝壳与柔软的海藻叶)和功能上(贻贝产生生物废物,而海藻为食草动物提供食物)有所不同。我们的数据从各个方面支持了这一假设。食性(主要是寡毛藻)在贻贝林分中更为普遍,而草食性在海藻林分中更为普遍。掠食者主要是螨虫,因此,它们在贻贝林中更为普遍,因为螨虫以寡毛藻为食。与身体和活动类型相关的功能性状也与基础种的性状有关。总之,我们认为基础种的结构和功能特性可以预测相关群落的功能方面。这一概念可能有助于在人为因素导致基础物种丧失后制定有效的恢复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Community Ecology
Community Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Community Ecology, established by the merger of two ecological periodicals, Coenoses and Abstracta Botanica was launched in an effort to create a common global forum for community ecologists dealing with plant, animal and/or microbial communities from terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems. Main subject areas: (i) community-based ecological theory; (ii) modelling of ecological communities; (iii) community-based ecophysiology; (iv) temporal dynamics, including succession; (v) trophic interactions, including food webs and competition; (vi) spatial pattern analysis, including scaling issues; (vii) community patterns of species richness and diversity; (viii) sampling ecological communities; (ix) data analysis methods.
期刊最新文献
Spatial dynamics and drivers of recent changes in grass and shrub cover in submontane grassland plant communities The nature of microbial diversity and assembly in the Nebraska Sandhills depends on organismal identity and habitat type Determinants of bird beta diversity patterns in a landscape with a relict habitat in northern Argentina The role of agroforestry in solving the agricultural landscapes vulnerabilities in the Po Plain district Climatic and biogeographic factors show contrasted effects on continental and volcanic ISARs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1