PP64 Cost-Effectiveness Of Fractional Flow Reserve As Diagnostic Tool In Coronary Artery Disease Versus Angiogram Alone In Indian context

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323002015
Monika Pusha, Arif Fahim, Kirti Kataria
{"title":"PP64 Cost-Effectiveness Of Fractional Flow Reserve As Diagnostic Tool In Coronary Artery Disease Versus Angiogram Alone In Indian context","authors":"Monika Pusha, Arif Fahim, Kirti Kataria","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a diagnostic tool that aids decision-making in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR provides an objective measurement and is used as an adjunct to an angiogram. The clinical and cost-benefit of using FFR have been well established across published literature. This research was aimed at evaluating the economic impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram versus an angiogram alone, in the Indian healthcare context.</p><span>Methods</span><p>A study from a tertiary care public hospital in India estimated the impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram in management of CAD. This study was used to create a mathematical simulation model to estimate cost-effectiveness and economic impact of using FFR over seven years’ time horizon, from the Indian health systems perspective. A targeted literature review was performed to collect the clinical inputs for the model, and the national public health insurance program data was referenced to obtain the cost inputs.</p><span>Results</span><p>A hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients in the model reported 30 percent reduction in unnecessary stenting. Moreover, 14,025 deaths were averted with the adoption of FFR. In addition, there was a cost-saving of INR46,986 (574USD) per death averted and INR5,169 (63USD) per patient treated over a seven-year time horizon. The analysis demonstrated that FFR inclusion in the current clinical practice saves INR2,651 (32USD) per patient in overall upfront cost and INR2,518 (31USD) per patient in overall follow-up cost over a seven year follow-up period owing to improved diagnosis and prognosis.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>In conclusion, FFR prevents unnecessary stenting, reduces overall mortality, and proves to be a cost-saving intervention in the long-term when used as a decision-making criterion in CAD patients in the Indian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is a diagnostic tool that aids decision-making in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). FFR provides an objective measurement and is used as an adjunct to an angiogram. The clinical and cost-benefit of using FFR have been well established across published literature. This research was aimed at evaluating the economic impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram versus an angiogram alone, in the Indian healthcare context.

Methods

A study from a tertiary care public hospital in India estimated the impact of using FFR as an adjunct to angiogram in management of CAD. This study was used to create a mathematical simulation model to estimate cost-effectiveness and economic impact of using FFR over seven years’ time horizon, from the Indian health systems perspective. A targeted literature review was performed to collect the clinical inputs for the model, and the national public health insurance program data was referenced to obtain the cost inputs.

Results

A hypothetical cohort of 100,000 patients in the model reported 30 percent reduction in unnecessary stenting. Moreover, 14,025 deaths were averted with the adoption of FFR. In addition, there was a cost-saving of INR46,986 (574USD) per death averted and INR5,169 (63USD) per patient treated over a seven-year time horizon. The analysis demonstrated that FFR inclusion in the current clinical practice saves INR2,651 (32USD) per patient in overall upfront cost and INR2,518 (31USD) per patient in overall follow-up cost over a seven year follow-up period owing to improved diagnosis and prognosis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, FFR prevents unnecessary stenting, reduces overall mortality, and proves to be a cost-saving intervention in the long-term when used as a decision-making criterion in CAD patients in the Indian context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PP64 在印度,将分数血流储备作为冠状动脉疾病诊断工具与单纯血管造影相比的成本效益
分数血流储备(FFR)是一种辅助冠状动脉疾病(CAD)治疗决策的诊断工具。FFR提供了一个客观的测量,并被用作辅助血管造影。在已发表的文献中,使用FFR的临床和成本效益已经得到了很好的证实。本研究旨在评估在印度医疗保健背景下,使用FFR辅助血管造影与单独血管造影的经济影响。方法印度一家三级公立医院的一项研究评估了使用FFR作为血管造影辅助治疗CAD的影响。该研究用于创建一个数学模拟模型,以从印度卫生系统的角度估计使用FFR在7年时间范围内的成本效益和经济影响。通过有针对性的文献综述来收集模型的临床投入,并参考国家公共医疗保险计划数据来获得成本投入。结果:在该模型中,一个假设的10万名患者队列报告了不必要的支架置入减少了30%。此外,采用FFR避免了14 025人死亡。此外,在七年的时间范围内,每个避免死亡的病例节省了46,986印度卢比(574美元),每个治疗患者节省了5,169印度卢比(63美元)。分析表明,在目前的临床实践中,由于诊断和预后的改善,在7年的随访期间,纳入FFR可为每位患者节省2,651卢比(32美元)的总前期成本,为每位患者节省2,518卢比(31美元)的总随访成本。结论:FFR可以防止不必要的支架置入,降低总体死亡率,并证明FFR作为印度CAD患者的决策标准是一种长期节省成本的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Development of an MCDA Framework for Rare Disease Reimbursement Prioritization in Malaysia. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. PP78 Real-World Trends And Medical Costs Of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Korea: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1