PP90 Artificial Intelligence To Detect Ischemic Heart Disease In Non-traumatic Chest Pain At The Emergency Department – SmartHeart Study

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323002180
Eunate Arana-arri, Aitor García de Vicuña, Silvia Carbajo, Sara de Benito Sobrado, Magdalena Carreras, Irma Arrieta, Juan Carlos Bayon-Yusta
{"title":"PP90 Artificial Intelligence To Detect Ischemic Heart Disease In Non-traumatic Chest Pain At The Emergency Department – SmartHeart Study","authors":"Eunate Arana-arri, Aitor García de Vicuña, Silvia Carbajo, Sara de Benito Sobrado, Magdalena Carreras, Irma Arrieta, Juan Carlos Bayon-Yusta","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323002180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction</span><p>An estimated 17.9 million people died from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in 2019, which is 32 percent of all global deaths and 85 percent were due to heart attack and stroke. Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for presenting to the emergency department (ED). It is increasingly recognized that artificial intelligence (AI) will have a significant impact on the practice of medicine in the near future and may help with diagnosis and risk stratification. We aim to estimate a diagnostic prediction of acute myocardial infarction by the development and validation of an AI model.</p><span>Methods</span><p>Data on 134 variables of 3,986 consecutive patients who presented to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain were included in the analysis. Using AI tools, a neural network model was developed to establish the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to achieve n=150 patients over 18 years of age attending the ED.</p><span>Results</span><p>The mean age was 65.5 (±13.7) years and 63.6 percent were male. Most (60.1%) patients were admitted to hospital, with only 20.3 percent diagnosed at hospital discharge with ischemic heart disease (IHD). All patients were followed up for two months, and 6.3 percent were readmitted to the ED, but none presented with an episode of IHD. In the data analysis of the entire sample we obtained a probability of diagnosing IHD by the SmartHeart model (S=93.1%, E=47.3%, PPV=31.0%, and NPV=96.4%). When we analyzed the sample of patients with no history of IHD (n=104), the diagnosis accuracy was as follows (S=100%, E=77.5%, PPV=42.8%, and NPV=100%).</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>Our AI model provides information to predict patients who are suffering from acute IHD. AI has been reported to outperform emergency physicians and current risk stratification tools to diagnose IHD, but has rarely been integrated into practice. This study highlights the diagnostic applicability and accuracy of this type of tool and that is why studies should be implemented to see its effectiveness in routine practice in EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323002180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

An estimated 17.9 million people died from cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in 2019, which is 32 percent of all global deaths and 85 percent were due to heart attack and stroke. Chest pain is one of the most common reasons for presenting to the emergency department (ED). It is increasingly recognized that artificial intelligence (AI) will have a significant impact on the practice of medicine in the near future and may help with diagnosis and risk stratification. We aim to estimate a diagnostic prediction of acute myocardial infarction by the development and validation of an AI model.

Methods

Data on 134 variables of 3,986 consecutive patients who presented to the ED with non-traumatic chest pain were included in the analysis. Using AI tools, a neural network model was developed to establish the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) to achieve n=150 patients over 18 years of age attending the ED.

Results

The mean age was 65.5 (±13.7) years and 63.6 percent were male. Most (60.1%) patients were admitted to hospital, with only 20.3 percent diagnosed at hospital discharge with ischemic heart disease (IHD). All patients were followed up for two months, and 6.3 percent were readmitted to the ED, but none presented with an episode of IHD. In the data analysis of the entire sample we obtained a probability of diagnosing IHD by the SmartHeart model (S=93.1%, E=47.3%, PPV=31.0%, and NPV=96.4%). When we analyzed the sample of patients with no history of IHD (n=104), the diagnosis accuracy was as follows (S=100%, E=77.5%, PPV=42.8%, and NPV=100%).

Conclusions

Our AI model provides information to predict patients who are suffering from acute IHD. AI has been reported to outperform emergency physicians and current risk stratification tools to diagnose IHD, but has rarely been integrated into practice. This study highlights the diagnostic applicability and accuracy of this type of tool and that is why studies should be implemented to see its effectiveness in routine practice in EDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 PP90 人工智能检测急诊科非创伤性胸痛中的缺血性心脏病 - SmartHeart 研究
2019年,估计有1790万人死于心血管疾病,占全球总死亡人数的32%,其中85%死于心脏病发作和中风。胸痛是到急诊科就诊的最常见原因之一。人们越来越认识到,人工智能(AI)将在不久的将来对医学实践产生重大影响,并可能有助于诊断和风险分层。我们的目标是通过开发和验证人工智能模型来估计急性心肌梗死的诊断预测。方法对3986例连续就诊于急诊科的非外伤性胸痛患者的134项数据进行分析。利用人工智能工具,建立神经网络模型,建立急性心肌梗死(AMI)风险,实现150例18岁以上患者就诊ed。结果平均年龄为65.5(±13.7)岁,男性占63.6%。大多数(60.1%)患者住院,只有20.3%的患者出院时被诊断为缺血性心脏病(IHD)。所有患者随访两个月,6.3%的患者再次入院,但没有一例出现IHD发作。在整个样本的数据分析中,我们获得了smarheart模型诊断IHD的概率(S=93.1%, E=47.3%, PPV=31.0%, NPV=96.4%)。当我们分析无IHD病史的患者样本(n=104)时,诊断准确率如下(S=100%, E=77.5%, PPV=42.8%, NPV=100%)。结论sour AI模型可为预测急性IHD患者提供信息。据报道,人工智能在诊断IHD方面优于急诊医生和目前的风险分层工具,但很少被纳入实践。本研究强调了这种诊断工具的适用性和准确性,这就是为什么应该实施研究,以了解其在急诊科常规实践中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Development of an MCDA Framework for Rare Disease Reimbursement Prioritization in Malaysia. Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study. PP78 Real-World Trends And Medical Costs Of Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation In Korea: A Nationwide, Population-Based Study Can requests for real-world evidence by the French HTA body be planned? An exhaustive retrospective case-control study of medicinal products appraisals from 2016 to 2021. A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of immunoglobulin treatment in patients with hematological malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1