Corporate ethical values disclosure: evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian top companies

Corina Joseph, Fitra Roman Cahaya, S. Yusuf, A. Probohudono, Estetika Mutiaranisa Kurniawati
{"title":"Corporate ethical values disclosure: evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian top companies","authors":"Corina Joseph, Fitra Roman Cahaya, S. Yusuf, A. Probohudono, Estetika Mutiaranisa Kurniawati","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-01-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the extent of ethical values information disclosure on the top 100 Malaysian and Indonesian companies’ annual reports using coercive isomorphism under the institutional theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing the content analysis, the presence or exclusion of ethical values information disclosed on 100 Malaysian and Indonesian companies’ annual reports using a newly developed Ethical Values Disclosure Index is carried out.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of the analysis found that Indonesian companies on average disclosed 31 items under study compared to 27 items disclosed by the companies in Malaysia. The results suggest that Indonesian companies are more vigilant in the code of ethics, companies policy on ethical issues, monitoring program and accountability, ethical performance, ethical infrastructure and organizational responsibility aspects, whereas their Malaysian counterparts are better in reporting governance and integrity committee or board of directors.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings may not be applicable to other countries in the same region, nevertheless, revealed the importance of adequate ethical values disclosure in determining the level of ethical behavior.\n\n\nPractical implications\nCompanies in Indonesia are coercively pressed by various influential stakeholder groups to address ethical issues. The less disclosure regarding corporate ethical behavior may indicate that unethical practices continue to be a problem in the Malaysian corporate sector.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper adds to the literature by examining the elements of ethical values adapted mainly from the professional bodies that regulate the accounting profession and other organizations using the institutional theory, particularly in two countries.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-01-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the extent of ethical values information disclosure on the top 100 Malaysian and Indonesian companies’ annual reports using coercive isomorphism under the institutional theory. Design/methodology/approach Using the content analysis, the presence or exclusion of ethical values information disclosed on 100 Malaysian and Indonesian companies’ annual reports using a newly developed Ethical Values Disclosure Index is carried out. Findings The results of the analysis found that Indonesian companies on average disclosed 31 items under study compared to 27 items disclosed by the companies in Malaysia. The results suggest that Indonesian companies are more vigilant in the code of ethics, companies policy on ethical issues, monitoring program and accountability, ethical performance, ethical infrastructure and organizational responsibility aspects, whereas their Malaysian counterparts are better in reporting governance and integrity committee or board of directors. Research limitations/implications The findings may not be applicable to other countries in the same region, nevertheless, revealed the importance of adequate ethical values disclosure in determining the level of ethical behavior. Practical implications Companies in Indonesia are coercively pressed by various influential stakeholder groups to address ethical issues. The less disclosure regarding corporate ethical behavior may indicate that unethical practices continue to be a problem in the Malaysian corporate sector. Originality/value This paper adds to the literature by examining the elements of ethical values adapted mainly from the professional bodies that regulate the accounting profession and other organizations using the institutional theory, particularly in two countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业道德价值观披露:来自马来西亚和印度尼西亚顶级公司的证据
目的运用制度理论下的强制同构理论,考察马来西亚和印尼百强企业年报中道德价值观信息披露的程度。设计/方法/方法通过内容分析,使用新开发的道德价值观披露指数,对100家马来西亚和印度尼西亚公司年度报告中披露的道德价值观信息进行存在或排除。分析结果发现,印尼公司平均披露了31项研究项目,而马来西亚公司披露了27项。结果表明,印尼公司在道德准则、公司道德问题政策、监督计划和问责制、道德绩效、道德基础设施和组织责任方面更加警惕,而马来西亚公司在报告治理和诚信委员会或董事会方面表现更好。研究的局限性/意义研究结果可能不适用于同一地区的其他国家,然而,揭示了充分披露道德价值观在确定道德行为水平方面的重要性。实际意义印度尼西亚的公司受到各种有影响力的利益相关者团体的强制压力,要求他们解决道德问题。关于企业道德行为的披露较少可能表明,不道德的做法仍然是马来西亚企业部门的一个问题。原创性/价值本文通过研究伦理价值的要素来补充文献,这些要素主要来自规范会计职业的专业团体和使用制度理论的其他组织,特别是在两个国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Digital financial literacy and usage of cashless payments in Jordan: the moderating role of gender Financial innovation and gender dynamics: a comparative study of male and female FinTech adoption in emerging economies Board gender diversity, audit quality, and the moderating role of political connections: evidence from the Gulf Co-operation Council Countries (GCC) Manager sentiment, policy uncertainty, ESG disclosure and firm performance: a large language model in corporate landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1