Amgen v. Sanofi: The U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Patent Enablement

Gregory Curfman, Marcia M. Boumil
{"title":"Amgen v. Sanofi: The U.S. Supreme Court Reviews Patent Enablement","authors":"Gregory Curfman, Marcia M. Boumil","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On June 18, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court in the matter of <span>Amgen, Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, et al.</span><span>1</span> unanimously upheld the 2021 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,<span>2</span> striking down as overbroad Amgen’s patent claim to an entire functional genus of monoclonal antibodies. Amgen’s patent claims were not limited to antibody structure or <span>antibody</span> amino acid sequences. This is significant because Amgen’s patent claims did have amino acid sequences, but they were directed to the epitope.</p>","PeriodicalId":501694,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2023.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On June 18, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court in the matter of Amgen, Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, et al.1 unanimously upheld the 2021 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,2 striking down as overbroad Amgen’s patent claim to an entire functional genus of monoclonal antibodies. Amgen’s patent claims were not limited to antibody structure or antibody amino acid sequences. This is significant because Amgen’s patent claims did have amino acid sequences, but they were directed to the epitope.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安进诉赛诺菲案:美国最高法院审查专利实施情况
2023年6月18日,在Amgen, Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, et al.一案中,美国最高法院一致支持美国联邦巡回上诉法院2021年的判决,2驳回了Amgen对整个单克隆抗体功能属的专利要求,认为其过于宽泛。安进的专利权利要求并不局限于抗体结构或抗体氨基酸序列。这是很重要的,因为安进的专利要求确实有氨基酸序列,但它们是指向表位的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reproductive Justice Beyond Borders: Global Feminist Solidarity in the Post-Roe Era Mifepristone Paternalism at the FDA Abortion Rights and the Child Welfare System: How Dobbs Exacerbates Existing Racial Inequities and Further Traumatizes Black Families Teaching Health Law Stopping Criminalization at the Bedside
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1