A refined percutaneous rhizotomy with DSA-guided ethanol for the second-line treatment of trigeminal neuralgia

Giang Bui Van , Khac Dung Nguyen , Tran Canh Nguyen , Hong Duc Pham , Xuan Hung Nguyen
{"title":"A refined percutaneous rhizotomy with DSA-guided ethanol for the second-line treatment of trigeminal neuralgia","authors":"Giang Bui Van ,&nbsp;Khac Dung Nguyen ,&nbsp;Tran Canh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Hong Duc Pham ,&nbsp;Xuan Hung Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Percutaneous rhizotomy is a group of techniques used to treat trigeminal neuralgia. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF) and Chemical Rhizotomy (CR) using glycerol are among the most frequently used methods. We have recently refined Ethanol Rhizotomy (ER) under Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) guidance.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted to compare our refined ER and RF ablation in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in terms of long-term pain relief and side effects.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Between 2012 and 2014, 33 patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia were enrolled, 10 of whom received RF and 23 received ER under (DSA) guidance with ethanol injected while in the supine position. The pain relief, duration of pain-free period, need for repeat injection, and recurrence of pain were recorded together with procedure-related complications within 7 years after the procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After a single intervention or, in some cases, a maximum of two repeated interventions, all 33 patients experienced complete pain relief. Nevertheless, following a single procedure, the success rate was 95.6% (22/23) in the ER group and 60% (6/10) in the RF group. Notably, complete numbness was the most significant side effect, with a higher incidence in the ER group (30.4%) compared to the RF group (0%) (p = 0.02). The recurrence rate was statistically different (p = 0.01) between the two groups, with 4.4% and 40% recorded in the ER and RF groups, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We demonstrated the usefulness of our refined ER procedure as a safe, cost-effective, and efficient second-line treatment for TN.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423002042/pdfft?md5=3495ac6249df472b2d52afced8f32fa7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594423002042-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423002042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous rhizotomy is a group of techniques used to treat trigeminal neuralgia. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF) and Chemical Rhizotomy (CR) using glycerol are among the most frequently used methods. We have recently refined Ethanol Rhizotomy (ER) under Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) guidance.

Objective

A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted to compare our refined ER and RF ablation in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in terms of long-term pain relief and side effects.

Method

Between 2012 and 2014, 33 patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia were enrolled, 10 of whom received RF and 23 received ER under (DSA) guidance with ethanol injected while in the supine position. The pain relief, duration of pain-free period, need for repeat injection, and recurrence of pain were recorded together with procedure-related complications within 7 years after the procedures.

Results

After a single intervention or, in some cases, a maximum of two repeated interventions, all 33 patients experienced complete pain relief. Nevertheless, following a single procedure, the success rate was 95.6% (22/23) in the ER group and 60% (6/10) in the RF group. Notably, complete numbness was the most significant side effect, with a higher incidence in the ER group (30.4%) compared to the RF group (0%) (p = 0.02). The recurrence rate was statistically different (p = 0.01) between the two groups, with 4.4% and 40% recorded in the ER and RF groups, respectively.

Conclusion

We demonstrated the usefulness of our refined ER procedure as a safe, cost-effective, and efficient second-line treatment for TN.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用 DSA 引导的乙醇进行经皮根切术治疗三叉神经痛的二线疗法
背景:经皮神经根切断术是治疗三叉神经痛的一组技术。使用甘油的射频热凝(RF)和化学根切断术(CR)是最常用的方法。我们最近在数字减影血管造影(DSA)指导下改进了乙醇根切开术(ER)。目的进行一项描述性、回顾性研究,比较我们改良ER和射频消融治疗三叉神经痛患者的长期疼痛缓解和副作用。方法选取2012 ~ 2014年典型三叉神经痛患者33例,其中10例采用射频治疗,23例采用仰卧位乙醇注射引导下ER治疗。记录术后7年内疼痛缓解、无痛持续时间、需要重复注射、疼痛复发情况及手术相关并发症。结果经过单次干预,或在某些情况下,最多两次重复干预,所有33例患者都完全缓解了疼痛。然而,单次手术后,ER组的成功率为95.6% (22/23),RF组的成功率为60%(6/10)。值得注意的是,完全麻木是最显著的副作用,ER组的发生率(30.4%)高于RF组(0%)(p = 0.02)。两组复发率差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01), ER组复发率4.4%,RF组复发率40%。结论:我们证明了我们改进的急诊手术作为一种安全、经济、有效的二线治疗TN的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1