Thoughtfully Integrating Cannabis Products Into Chronic Pain Treatment

Kevin F. Boehnke, Christopher L. Wu, Daniel J. Clauw
{"title":"Thoughtfully Integrating Cannabis Products Into Chronic Pain Treatment","authors":"Kevin F. Boehnke, Christopher L. Wu, Daniel J. Clauw","doi":"10.1213/ane.0000000000005904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"mechanistic plausibility that CPs and CBMs may be useful for pain management, the clinical trial literature is limited and does not refute or support the use of CBMs for pain management. Complicating matters, a large and growing body of observational literature shows that many people use CPs for pain management and in place of other medications. However, products and dosing regimens in existing trials are not generalizable to the current cannabis market, making it difficult to compare and reconcile these 2 bodies of literature. Given this complexity, clinicians need clear, pragmatic guidance on how to appropriately educate and work with patients who are using CBMs for pain management. In this review, we narratively synthesize the evidence to enable a clear view of current landscape and provide pragmatic advice for clinicians to use when working with patients. This advice revolves around 3 principles: (1) maintaining the therapeutic alliance; (2) harm reduction and benefit maximization; and (3) pragmatism, principles of patient-centered care, and use of best clinical judgment in the face of uncertainty. Despite the lack of certainty CPs and chronic pain management use, we believe that following these principles can make most of the clinical opportunity presented by discussions around CPs and also enhance the likelihood of clinical benefit from CPs....","PeriodicalId":7799,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia & Analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

mechanistic plausibility that CPs and CBMs may be useful for pain management, the clinical trial literature is limited and does not refute or support the use of CBMs for pain management. Complicating matters, a large and growing body of observational literature shows that many people use CPs for pain management and in place of other medications. However, products and dosing regimens in existing trials are not generalizable to the current cannabis market, making it difficult to compare and reconcile these 2 bodies of literature. Given this complexity, clinicians need clear, pragmatic guidance on how to appropriately educate and work with patients who are using CBMs for pain management. In this review, we narratively synthesize the evidence to enable a clear view of current landscape and provide pragmatic advice for clinicians to use when working with patients. This advice revolves around 3 principles: (1) maintaining the therapeutic alliance; (2) harm reduction and benefit maximization; and (3) pragmatism, principles of patient-centered care, and use of best clinical judgment in the face of uncertainty. Despite the lack of certainty CPs and chronic pain management use, we believe that following these principles can make most of the clinical opportunity presented by discussions around CPs and also enhance the likelihood of clinical benefit from CPs....
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将大麻产品周到地融入慢性疼痛治疗中
CPs和CBMs可能对疼痛管理有用的机制合理性,临床试验文献有限,不反驳或支持CBMs用于疼痛管理。更复杂的是,越来越多的观察性文献表明,许多人使用CPs来控制疼痛,代替其他药物。然而,现有试验中的产品和给药方案不能推广到当前的大麻市场,因此很难比较和协调这两种文献。鉴于这种复杂性,临床医生需要明确、务实的指导,如何对使用CBMs进行疼痛管理的患者进行适当的教育和工作。在这篇综述中,我们叙述性地综合证据,以使当前的景观有一个清晰的视图,并提供实用的建议,临床医生使用时,与患者工作。这个建议围绕着3个原则:(1)保持治疗联盟;(2)减少危害,实现利益最大化;(3)实用主义,以患者为中心的护理原则,以及在面对不确定性时使用最佳临床判断。尽管缺乏确定性的CPs和慢性疼痛管理的使用,我们相信,遵循这些原则可以使大多数临床机会围绕CPs的讨论,也提高从CPs临床获益的可能性....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Multidisciplinary Team Huddle Improves Communication and Safety for Unscheduled Cesarean Deliveries: A System Redesign Using Improvement Science. Oxygen-Sparing Anesthesia with Electrically Controlled Ventilators: A Bench Study with Implications for Clinical Practice and Resource Management. An Exploratory Analysis of ChatGPT Compared to Human Performance With the Anesthesiology Oral Board Examination: Initial Insights and Implications. Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound to Evaluate Lung Isolation During One-Lung Ventilation in Children: A Blinded Observational Feasibility Study. Developments in Transfusion Medicine: Pulmonary Transfusion Reactions and Novel Blood Cell Labeling Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1