Reconstructing Income Inequality in Italy: New Evidence and Tax System Implications from Distributional National Accounts

IF 3.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the European Economic Association Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1093/jeea/jvad073
Demetrio Guzzardi, Elisa Palagi, Andrea Roventini, Alessandro Santoro
{"title":"Reconstructing Income Inequality in Italy: New Evidence and Tax System Implications from Distributional National Accounts","authors":"Demetrio Guzzardi, Elisa Palagi, Andrea Roventini, Alessandro Santoro","doi":"10.1093/jeea/jvad073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work reconstructs novel series on income distribution in Italy combining survey data, tax data and National Accounts both at the national and regional levels, and it analyzes the overall progressivity of the tax system. Our new Distributional National Accounts allow to correct for remarkable misreporting of capital income in surveys, to provide more accurate estimates of consumption, and to better account for the role of informal economy. Our fresh estimates show higher income concentration at the top 1% and 0.1% with respect to previous studies in order of 1.5 percentage points. Moreover, the share of national income of the richest top 10%, top 1% and top 0.1% has been steadily increasing after the 2008 crisis. Our results shed further light on the multifaceted nature of inequality in Italy: youngest individuals, women and inhabitants of Southern regions have been increasingly exposed to growing levels of inequality. Finally, the Italian tax system is only slightly progressive up to the 95th percentile of the income distribution, and regressive for the top 5%. Moreover, it is regressive throughout the whole distribution when individuals are ranked with respect to their net wealth.","PeriodicalId":48297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the European Economic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the European Economic Association","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvad073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work reconstructs novel series on income distribution in Italy combining survey data, tax data and National Accounts both at the national and regional levels, and it analyzes the overall progressivity of the tax system. Our new Distributional National Accounts allow to correct for remarkable misreporting of capital income in surveys, to provide more accurate estimates of consumption, and to better account for the role of informal economy. Our fresh estimates show higher income concentration at the top 1% and 0.1% with respect to previous studies in order of 1.5 percentage points. Moreover, the share of national income of the richest top 10%, top 1% and top 0.1% has been steadily increasing after the 2008 crisis. Our results shed further light on the multifaceted nature of inequality in Italy: youngest individuals, women and inhabitants of Southern regions have been increasingly exposed to growing levels of inequality. Finally, the Italian tax system is only slightly progressive up to the 95th percentile of the income distribution, and regressive for the top 5%. Moreover, it is regressive throughout the whole distribution when individuals are ranked with respect to their net wealth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重构意大利的收入不平等:来自国民账户分配的新证据和税收制度影响
这项工作结合调查数据、税收数据以及国家和地区层面的国民账户,重新构建了意大利收入分配的新系列,并对税收制度的整体累进性进行了分析。我们的新分配国民账户可以纠正调查中对资本收入的明显误报,提供更准确的消费估算,并更好地解释非正规经济的作用。与之前的研究相比,我们的新估算结果显示,收入最高的 1%和 0.1%人群的收入集中度更高,约为 1.5 个百分点。此外,2008 年危机后,最富有的前 10%、前 1%和前 0.1%人群的国民收入占比稳步上升。我们的研究结果进一步揭示了意大利不平等现象的多面性:最年轻的个人、女性和南部地区的居民越来越多地受到日益严重的不平等现象的影响。最后,意大利的税收制度在收入分布的第 95 个百分位数以下只有轻微的累进性,而对于收入最高的 5%则是累退性的。此外,如果根据个人的净财富进行排序,则在整个分配中都是累退的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Journal of the European Economic Association replaces the European Economic Review as the official journal of the association. JEEA publishes articles of the highest scientific quality and is an outlet for theoretical and empirical work with global relevance. The journal is committed to promoting the ambitions of the EEA: the development and application of economics as a science, as well as the communication and exchange between teachers, researchers and students in economics.
期刊最新文献
Life Out of the Shadows: The Impacts of Regularization Programs on the Lives of Forced Migrants Social Capital, Government Expenditures and Growth Testing Models of Strategic Uncertainty: Equilibrium Selection in Repeated Games Sme Failures Under Large Liquidity Shocks: an Application to the Covid-19 Crisis The Making of Social Democracy: The Economic and Electoral Consequences of Norway’s 1936 Folk School Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1