High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Prostate International Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001
Ee Jean Lim , Daniele Castellani , Bhaskar K. Somani , Mehmet I. Gökce , Khi Yung Fong , Fernando G. Sancha , Thomas R.W. Herrmann , Sarvajit Biligere , Azimdjon N. Tursunkulov , Marco Dellabella , Mario Sofer , Dmitry Enikeev , Vladislav Petov , Nariman Gadzhiev , Dean Elterman , Abhay Mahajan , Moises R. Socarras , Dilmurod S. Yunusov , Furkat Nasirov , Jeremy Y.C. Teoh , Vineet Gauhar
{"title":"High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group","authors":"Ee Jean Lim ,&nbsp;Daniele Castellani ,&nbsp;Bhaskar K. Somani ,&nbsp;Mehmet I. Gökce ,&nbsp;Khi Yung Fong ,&nbsp;Fernando G. Sancha ,&nbsp;Thomas R.W. Herrmann ,&nbsp;Sarvajit Biligere ,&nbsp;Azimdjon N. Tursunkulov ,&nbsp;Marco Dellabella ,&nbsp;Mario Sofer ,&nbsp;Dmitry Enikeev ,&nbsp;Vladislav Petov ,&nbsp;Nariman Gadzhiev ,&nbsp;Dean Elterman ,&nbsp;Abhay Mahajan ,&nbsp;Moises R. Socarras ,&nbsp;Dilmurod S. Yunusov ,&nbsp;Furkat Nasirov ,&nbsp;Jeremy Y.C. Teoh ,&nbsp;Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, <em>P</em> = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"12 1","pages":"Pages 40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888223000727/pdfft?md5=1212268e327c25ef1c3e88bb75013194&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888223000727-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888223000727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has gained acceptance as an equitable alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Our primary aim is to compare peri-operative outcomes of EEP using thulium fiber laser (TFL) against high-power holmium laser (HPHL) in hands of experienced surgeons for large prostates (≥80 ml in volume). Secondary outcomes were assess complications within 1 year of follow up.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with TFL or HPHL in 13 centers (January 2019-January 2023). Patients with prostate volume ≥80 ml were included, while those with concomitant prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, and pelvic radiotherapy were excluded.

Results

Of 1,929 included patients, HPHL was utilized in 1,459 and TFL in 470. After propensity score matching (PSM) for baseline characteristics, 247 patients from each group were analyzed. Overall operative time (90 [70, 120] vs. 52.5 [39, 93] min, P < 0.001) and enucleation time (90 [70, 105] vs. 38 [25, 70] min, P < 0.001) were longer in the TFL group, with comparable morcellation time (13 [10, 19.5] vs. 13 [10, 16.5] min, P = 0.914). In terms of postoperative outcomes, there were no differences in 30-day complications such as acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection or sepsis. In the PSM cohort, univariable analyses showed that higher age, lower preoperative Qmax, higher preoperative PVRU, and longer operation time were associated with higher odds of postoperative incontinence, while 2-lobe enucleation had lower odds of incontinence compared to 3-lobe enucleation.

Conclusions

This real-world study reaffirms that HPHL and TFL in large prostates are equally efficacious in terms of 30-day complications. TFL with the en-bloc technique has a shorter operative time which significantly improves short- and medium-term functional outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对腺体大于 80 毫升的患者进行前列腺内窥镜去核术时,高功率钬激光与铥纤维激光的比较:PEEL研究小组的研究结果
背景内镜下前列腺去核术(EEP)作为经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的替代方法,已被越来越多的人接受。我们的主要目的是比较使用铥光纤激光器(TFL)和高功率钬激光器(HPHL)在经验丰富的外科医生手中对体积较大的前列腺(体积≥80毫升)进行前列腺电切术的围手术期疗效。次要结果是评估随访 1 年内的并发症。方法我们回顾性审查了 13 个中心(2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月)接受 TFL 或 HPHL EEP 的良性前列腺增生患者。纳入的患者前列腺体积≥80毫升,排除了合并前列腺癌、既往接受过前列腺/尿道手术和盆腔放疗的患者。根据基线特征进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)后,对每组的 247 名患者进行了分析。TFL 组的总体手术时间(90 [70, 120] vs 52.5 [39, 93] min,p< 0.001)和去核时间(90 [70, 105] vs 38 [25, 70] min,p< 0.001)更长,而切除时间(13 [10, 19.5] vs 13 [10, 16.5] min,p=0.914)相当。在术后结果方面,30 天并发症(如急性尿潴留、尿路感染或败血症)没有差异。在 PSM 队列中,单变量分析表明,年龄越大、术前 Qmax 越低、术前 PVRU 越高、手术时间越长,术后尿失禁的几率就越高,而两叶去核术与三叶去核术相比,尿失禁的几率更低。采用全切技术的TFL手术时间更短,可显著改善中短期功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Screening and validation of novel serum panel of microRNA in stratification of prostate cancer” [Prostate Int 11 (2023) 150–158] Current status and therapeutic value of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer Negative magnetic resonance imaging cannot be used to omit an initial prostate biopsy - An ambispective study Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging The association between inflammatory bowel disease and risk of prostate cancer: a population-based retrospective study based on Korean National Health Insurance Service database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1