OP66 Adoption Of The World Health Organization Algorithm For Essential Medicines In The Philippine National Formulary Listing Process

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323000934
Sheena Jasley Samonte, Princess Allyza Mondala, Lara Alyssa Liban, Patrick Wincy Reyes, Anne Julienne Marfori, Anna Melissa Guerrero, Bu Castro, Isidro Sia, Maria Minerva Calimag, Cecilia Maramba-Lazarte, Imelda Peña
{"title":"OP66 Adoption Of The World Health Organization Algorithm For Essential Medicines In The Philippine National Formulary Listing Process","authors":"Sheena Jasley Samonte, Princess Allyza Mondala, Lara Alyssa Liban, Patrick Wincy Reyes, Anne Julienne Marfori, Anna Melissa Guerrero, Bu Castro, Isidro Sia, Maria Minerva Calimag, Cecilia Maramba-Lazarte, Imelda Peña","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323000934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe Philippine National Formulary (PNF) System preceded the health technology assessment (HTA) process in the Philippines, which was institutionalized in 2019. The transition led to previously prioritized topics of expert bodies overseeing the PNF System being endorsed to the HTA Council. However, the advent of COVID-19 forced the HTA Philippines to focus on emergency assessment needs and financing recommendations for the national government, resulting in limited capacity to assess non-public health emergency topics. To address this and improve patient access to medicines, we adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) process for evaluating and selecting medicines in the National Essential Medicines List (NEML).MethodsIn assessing the pre-pandemic topics, we matched the population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes of the WHO clinical evidence reviews with those scoped with relevant stakeholders and performed local costing analyses to ensure applicability of findings to the Philippine setting. When needed, we subjected the topics to price negotiation or conducted qualitative assessments.ResultsWe found the method efficient in expediting the decision-making process of the HTA Council. However, given the limited internal capacity of the HTA Philippines to conduct assessments for all ongoing HTA tracks, some of the topics responsive to Universal Health Care will be outsourced to the HTA Research Network, which is yet to be established. There is also a need to improve alignment among the topics being assessed, since the priorities of the proponents, national health program, and national payer have already evolved.ConclusionsIt is important to identify the priority areas for stakeholders as part of the topic nomination process, account for analytic capacity when setting the number of topics for HTA, establish mechanisms to allow proponents to conduct HTAs based on the HTA Council’s methodological standards, and proactively work with the national regulatory agency on horizon scanning and early HTA. We also recommend efficient monitoring, evaluation, and updating of the Philippine HTA guidelines so that they are more responsive to the needs of the healthcare system and the Filipino people.","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323000934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe Philippine National Formulary (PNF) System preceded the health technology assessment (HTA) process in the Philippines, which was institutionalized in 2019. The transition led to previously prioritized topics of expert bodies overseeing the PNF System being endorsed to the HTA Council. However, the advent of COVID-19 forced the HTA Philippines to focus on emergency assessment needs and financing recommendations for the national government, resulting in limited capacity to assess non-public health emergency topics. To address this and improve patient access to medicines, we adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) process for evaluating and selecting medicines in the National Essential Medicines List (NEML).MethodsIn assessing the pre-pandemic topics, we matched the population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes of the WHO clinical evidence reviews with those scoped with relevant stakeholders and performed local costing analyses to ensure applicability of findings to the Philippine setting. When needed, we subjected the topics to price negotiation or conducted qualitative assessments.ResultsWe found the method efficient in expediting the decision-making process of the HTA Council. However, given the limited internal capacity of the HTA Philippines to conduct assessments for all ongoing HTA tracks, some of the topics responsive to Universal Health Care will be outsourced to the HTA Research Network, which is yet to be established. There is also a need to improve alignment among the topics being assessed, since the priorities of the proponents, national health program, and national payer have already evolved.ConclusionsIt is important to identify the priority areas for stakeholders as part of the topic nomination process, account for analytic capacity when setting the number of topics for HTA, establish mechanisms to allow proponents to conduct HTAs based on the HTA Council’s methodological standards, and proactively work with the national regulatory agency on horizon scanning and early HTA. We also recommend efficient monitoring, evaluation, and updating of the Philippine HTA guidelines so that they are more responsive to the needs of the healthcare system and the Filipino people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OP66 在菲律宾国家处方集列表过程中采用世界卫生组织的基本药物算法
导言菲律宾国家处方集(PNF)系统先于菲律宾的卫生技术评估(HTA)流程,于 2019 年实现制度化。这一过渡导致负责监督菲律宾国家处方集系统的专家机构先前优先考虑的主题获得了 HTA 理事会的认可。然而,COVID-19 的出现迫使菲律宾 HTA 专注于为国家政府提供紧急评估需求和融资建议,导致评估非公共卫生紧急议题的能力有限。在评估大流行前的课题时,我们将世界卫生组织临床证据综述中的人群、干预措施、比较者和结果与相关利益方确定的范围相匹配,并进行了当地成本分析,以确保研究结果适用于菲律宾的环境。必要时,我们对这些主题进行了价格谈判或定性评估。结果我们发现,这种方法能有效加快 HTA 委员会的决策过程。然而,由于菲律宾 HTA 内部能力有限,无法对所有正在进行的 HTA 项目进行评估,因此一些与全民医保相关的课题将外包给尚未建立的 HTA 研究网络。结论 作为课题提名过程的一部分,确定利益相关者的优先领域非常重要,在确定 HTA 课题数量时应考虑分析能力,建立机制允许提议者根据 HTA 委员会的方法标准开展 HTA,并积极主动地与国家监管机构合作开展前景扫描和早期 HTA。我们还建议对菲律宾的 HTA 指南进行有效的监督、评估和更新,使其更加符合医疗保健系统和菲律宾人民的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
期刊最新文献
Generative artificial intelligence in health technology assessment: a patient and citizen dialogue on trust, human oversight, and shared governance. DEVELOPING AN ASSESSMENT TOOL TO MEASURE HEALTH EQUITY CONSIDERATIONS OF GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOKS. Early health technology assessment of a primary care tool for the diagnosis and management of headaches in Alberta, Canada. BUILDING CAPACITY FOR MEDICAL DEVICE ASSESSMENT: ONLINE TRAINING FOR UKRAINIAN EXPERTS. A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR) ON THE ADOPTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ASSISTED SLRS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1