Polyandry works as bet-hedging in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, even after eliminating females in poor condition that cannot accept remating

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Ethology Pub Date : 2023-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s10164-023-00803-3
Yuto Yamamoto, Yukio Yasui
{"title":"Polyandry works as bet-hedging in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus, even after eliminating females in poor condition that cannot accept remating","authors":"Yuto Yamamoto, Yukio Yasui","doi":"10.1007/s10164-023-00803-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Any kind of unpredictability affects female reproduction. In fluctuating environments, the fittest genotype can change between generations, and mating with “unsuitable” males will result in reproductive failure due to their genetic or environmental factors. If females cannot discriminate the quality of mates, monandrous mating with “unsuitable” male may lead to reproductive failure. Bet-hedging polyandry hypothesis suggests that polyandry can spread such risks over multiple males and some empirical studies support this hypothesis. However, no studies have considered the effect of female condition on mating acceptance. Because polyandry accumulates the costs of mating, only high conditioned females could accept multiple mating. In this study, females were assigned to monandry (M), two mating polyandry (2P), or three mating polyandry (3P) treatments. All females were mated with three males. For females assigned to the M treatment, for the second and third matings, we removed spermatophores immediately after transfer. For 2P females, the final spermatophore was removed immediately after transfer. Geometric mean fitness across (pseudo) generations as a long-term fitness index (calculated from the egg fertilization rate and egg hatching rate) significantly increased with the number of undisturbed mates. Therefore, the bet-hedging polyandry hypothesis is again supported after adjusting for the female condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":54837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-023-00803-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Any kind of unpredictability affects female reproduction. In fluctuating environments, the fittest genotype can change between generations, and mating with “unsuitable” males will result in reproductive failure due to their genetic or environmental factors. If females cannot discriminate the quality of mates, monandrous mating with “unsuitable” male may lead to reproductive failure. Bet-hedging polyandry hypothesis suggests that polyandry can spread such risks over multiple males and some empirical studies support this hypothesis. However, no studies have considered the effect of female condition on mating acceptance. Because polyandry accumulates the costs of mating, only high conditioned females could accept multiple mating. In this study, females were assigned to monandry (M), two mating polyandry (2P), or three mating polyandry (3P) treatments. All females were mated with three males. For females assigned to the M treatment, for the second and third matings, we removed spermatophores immediately after transfer. For 2P females, the final spermatophore was removed immediately after transfer. Geometric mean fitness across (pseudo) generations as a long-term fitness index (calculated from the egg fertilization rate and egg hatching rate) significantly increased with the number of undisturbed mates. Therefore, the bet-hedging polyandry hypothesis is again supported after adjusting for the female condition.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在田间蟋蟀 Gryllus bimaculatus 中,即使淘汰了不能接受再交配的体质较差的雌性蟋蟀,多雄性蟋蟀也能起到对赌作用
任何一种不可预测性都会影响雌性繁殖。在波动的环境中,最合适的基因型会在世代之间发生变化,与 "不合适 "的雄性交配会因它们的遗传或环境因素而导致繁殖失败。如果雌性不能辨别配偶的质量,与 "不合适 "的雄性进行单性交配可能会导致繁殖失败。Bet-hedging 多雄性交配假说认为,多雄性交配可以将这种风险分散到多个雄性身上,一些实证研究也支持这一假说。然而,还没有研究考虑过雌性条件对交配接受度的影响。由于多雄交配会累积交配成本,因此只有条件较高的雌性才能接受多雄交配。在这项研究中,雌性被分配到单雄交配(M)、两雄多雄交配(2P)或三雄多雄交配(3P)处理中。所有雌性都与三只雄性交配。对于被分配到 M 处理的雌性,在第二和第三次交配时,我们会在转移精子后立即移除精子。对于 2P 处理的雌性,最后一个精子在转移后立即被移除。跨(伪)代几何平均适合度作为长期适合度指数(由卵子受精率和卵子孵化率计算得出),随着未受干扰配偶数量的增加而显著提高。因此,在对雌性条件进行调整后,押对多雄性假说再次得到支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ethology
Journal of Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethology features reviews and original papers relating to all aspects of animal behavior, including traditional ethology. Papers on field, laboratory, or theoretical studies are welcomed. In contrast to many other ethological journals that prefer studies testing explicit hypotheses, the Journal of Ethology is interested both in observational studies and in experimental studies. However, the authors of observational studies are always requested to provide background information about behaviors in their study and an appropriate context to establish the scientific importance of their observation, which in turn produces fascinating hypotheses to explain the behaviors.
期刊最新文献
A theory of spawning habitat selection in anurans Subterranean to submarine: stress-induced locomotor repertoire expansion and aquatic escape in the Anatolian mole rat (Nannospalax xanthodon) under risk of predation Risk-taking behavior in birds foraging along interurban roads Reduced fitness in losers of leg-biting male combat compared to uncontested males in Zophobas atratus Day-after impact of simulated rival encounter in the common cuckoo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1