OP61 Value Of Disinvestment: The Journey From Possibility To Reality

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1017/s0266462323000909
Ku Nurhasni Ku Abd Rahim, Hanin Farhana Kamaruzaman, Mohamed Hirman Abdullah, Izzuna Mudla Mohamed Ghazali
{"title":"OP61 Value Of Disinvestment: The Journey From Possibility To Reality","authors":"Ku Nurhasni Ku Abd Rahim, Hanin Farhana Kamaruzaman, Mohamed Hirman Abdullah, Izzuna Mudla Mohamed Ghazali","doi":"10.1017/s0266462323000909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionIn recent years, most countries have struggled to meet the annual demand for increases in healthcare resources. This scenario poses a significant challenge for those who pay for or manage healthcare services, namely the clinicians and hospital managers Thus, value-based implementation for resource allocation may include disinvestment initiatives to maximize benefits to patients and the population. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of incorporating a systematic and explicit value assessment in hospital-based decision-making for the prioritization of resource allocation.MethodsAn evidence-informed stakeholder engagement workshop was held with approximately 50 hospital directors and utilized a scenario analysis of making decisions for hospital procurement. The key question discussed was what should be considered when making decisions about resource allocation and disinvestment in health services at the hospital level. The participants were divided into five groups with a mix of multilevel institutional categories. Each group was given a similar resource allocation scenario, a wish list, and a shift list. The participants were involved in a facilitated discussion on the process, criteria for prioritization, and the justification of their final selections. Subsequently, a deliberative discussion was held at the end of the workshop to explore the feasibility of this prioritization method.ResultsPrioritization criteria that were identified and unanimously agreed upon included effectiveness, safety, burden of disease, suitability of services, human resources and facilities, and economic considerations. The deliberative discussion also highlighted the impact of the disinvestment of services, managing the expectation of patients and clinicians, and monitoring and audit mechanisms.ConclusionsThe value of disinvestment should not compromise access to services and quality of care. There is a huge potential for implementing a systematic and explicit value assessment in hospital-based decision-making for prioritization of resource allocation. Further refinement of the process and mitigation of challenges will enable its use.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462323000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionIn recent years, most countries have struggled to meet the annual demand for increases in healthcare resources. This scenario poses a significant challenge for those who pay for or manage healthcare services, namely the clinicians and hospital managers Thus, value-based implementation for resource allocation may include disinvestment initiatives to maximize benefits to patients and the population. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of incorporating a systematic and explicit value assessment in hospital-based decision-making for the prioritization of resource allocation.MethodsAn evidence-informed stakeholder engagement workshop was held with approximately 50 hospital directors and utilized a scenario analysis of making decisions for hospital procurement. The key question discussed was what should be considered when making decisions about resource allocation and disinvestment in health services at the hospital level. The participants were divided into five groups with a mix of multilevel institutional categories. Each group was given a similar resource allocation scenario, a wish list, and a shift list. The participants were involved in a facilitated discussion on the process, criteria for prioritization, and the justification of their final selections. Subsequently, a deliberative discussion was held at the end of the workshop to explore the feasibility of this prioritization method.ResultsPrioritization criteria that were identified and unanimously agreed upon included effectiveness, safety, burden of disease, suitability of services, human resources and facilities, and economic considerations. The deliberative discussion also highlighted the impact of the disinvestment of services, managing the expectation of patients and clinicians, and monitoring and audit mechanisms.ConclusionsThe value of disinvestment should not compromise access to services and quality of care. There is a huge potential for implementing a systematic and explicit value assessment in hospital-based decision-making for prioritization of resource allocation. Further refinement of the process and mitigation of challenges will enable its use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OP61 取消投资的价值:从可能到现实的旅程
导言近年来,大多数国家都在努力满足每年不断增长的医疗资源需求。因此,以价值为基础实施资源分配可能包括取消投资举措,以最大限度地提高患者和人口的利益。本研究的目的是探讨将系统而明确的价值评估纳入医院决策的可行性,以确定资源分配的优先次序。方法与大约 50 名医院院长举行了以证据为基础的利益相关者参与研讨会,并对医院采购决策进行了情景分析。讨论的关键问题是,在医院层面做出资源分配和取消医疗服务投资的决策时,应考虑哪些因素。参与者被分为五组,包括多级机构类别。每个小组都有一份类似的资源分配方案、一份愿望清单和一份转变清单。与会人员参与了有关流程、优先次序标准和最终选择理由的讨论。结果确定并一致同意的优先排序标准包括有效性、安全性、疾病负担、服务的适宜性、人力资源和设施以及经济因素。审议讨论还强调了取消服务投资的影响、管理患者和临床医生的期望以及监测和审计机制。在医院决策中实施系统、明确的价值评估,以确定资源分配的优先次序,具有巨大的潜力。进一步完善这一过程并减少挑战将有助于其应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1