Quantifying surgical completeness in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI:10.1186/s40463-023-00682-1
Marc Levin, Yvonne Chan, Doron D. Sommer, Andrew Thamboo, John M. Lee
{"title":"Quantifying surgical completeness in patients with aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease","authors":"Marc Levin, Yvonne Chan, Doron D. Sommer, Andrew Thamboo, John M. Lee","doi":"10.1186/s40463-023-00682-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in patients who have had sinus surgery remains a management challenge. Aspirin desensitization and biologics are additional treatment options. It remains unclear if patients require a more comprehensive surgery prior to implementing such additional therapies. The purpose of this study was to quantify prior surgery completeness in AERD patients at a tertiary rhinology practice. Paranasal sinus CT scans were reviewed by four academic rhinologists to assess surgery completeness. Using a published CT grading system, each sinus was graded on the completeness of surgery and middle turbinate reduction. A score out of 14 was calculated for each patient (7 per side). Sixty-one patients with AERD out of 141 available were included. Mean inter-rater agreement across all sinuses was moderate (k = 0.42). The mean completeness score was 6.7/14. The following procedures were rated as complete (means): uncinectomy (L: 84%, R: 82%, k = 0.44), maxillary (L: 83%, R: 77%, k = 0.32), middle turbinate reduction (L: 45%, R: 46%, k = 0.31), anterior ethmoid (L: 35%, R: 39%, k = 0.51), sphenoid (L: 36%, R: 35%, k = 0.4), posterior ethmoid (L: 30%, R: 30%, k = 0.48), frontal (L: 22%, R: 21%, k = 0.46). Prior surgery in AERD patients were mostly deemed incomplete. Uncinectomy and maxillary antrostomy are the most common procedures previously performed. It remains toe seen whether this would be considered ‘adequate’ surgery or more ‘complete’ surgery is required to achieve greater disease control.","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00682-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in patients who have had sinus surgery remains a management challenge. Aspirin desensitization and biologics are additional treatment options. It remains unclear if patients require a more comprehensive surgery prior to implementing such additional therapies. The purpose of this study was to quantify prior surgery completeness in AERD patients at a tertiary rhinology practice. Paranasal sinus CT scans were reviewed by four academic rhinologists to assess surgery completeness. Using a published CT grading system, each sinus was graded on the completeness of surgery and middle turbinate reduction. A score out of 14 was calculated for each patient (7 per side). Sixty-one patients with AERD out of 141 available were included. Mean inter-rater agreement across all sinuses was moderate (k = 0.42). The mean completeness score was 6.7/14. The following procedures were rated as complete (means): uncinectomy (L: 84%, R: 82%, k = 0.44), maxillary (L: 83%, R: 77%, k = 0.32), middle turbinate reduction (L: 45%, R: 46%, k = 0.31), anterior ethmoid (L: 35%, R: 39%, k = 0.51), sphenoid (L: 36%, R: 35%, k = 0.4), posterior ethmoid (L: 30%, R: 30%, k = 0.48), frontal (L: 22%, R: 21%, k = 0.46). Prior surgery in AERD patients were mostly deemed incomplete. Uncinectomy and maxillary antrostomy are the most common procedures previously performed. It remains toe seen whether this would be considered ‘adequate’ surgery or more ‘complete’ surgery is required to achieve greater disease control.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化阿司匹林加重呼吸系统疾病患者的手术完整性
鼻窦手术患者的阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病(AERD)仍然是一个治疗难题。阿司匹林脱敏和生物制剂是额外的治疗选择。目前仍不清楚患者在实施这些额外疗法之前是否需要进行更全面的手术。本研究的目的是对一家三级鼻科医院的急性鼻窦炎患者之前的手术完整性进行量化。副鼻窦 CT 扫描由四位学术鼻科专家进行审查,以评估手术的完整性。使用已公布的 CT 分级系统,对每个鼻窦的手术和中鼻甲缩小的完整性进行评分。每位患者的满分是 14 分(每侧 7 分)。在现有的 141 名 AERD 患者中,有 61 名患者被纳入其中。所有鼻窦的平均评分者间一致性为中等(k = 0.42)。平均完整评分为 6.7/14。以下手术被评为完整(平均值):钩突切除术(L:84%,R:82%,k = 0.44)、上颌窦(L:83%,R:77%,k = 0.32)、中鼻甲缩小术(L:45%,R:46%,k = 0.31)、乙状前叶(L:35%,R:39%,k = 0.51)、蝶窦(L:36%,R:35%,k = 0.4)、乙状后叶(L:30%,R:30%,k = 0.48)、额叶(L:22%,R:21%,k = 0.46)。AERD患者之前的手术大多被认为是不完全的。无骨切除术和上颌前突切除术是以前最常见的手术。这是否被认为是 "适当 "的手术,还是需要更 "彻底 "的手术才能达到更好的疾病控制效果,我们拭目以待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
期刊最新文献
A Descriptive Study of Quality of Life Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Central Vestibular Dysfunction in Head Injury. Does Managing Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Improve Their Depression Score? Prospective Study. IGF-1 Mediated Neuroprotective Effects of Olfactory-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Auditory Hair Cells. Potential Application of Hydrops MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1