{"title":"How trace plots help interpret meta-analysis results","authors":"Christian Röver, David Rindskopf, Tim Friede","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The trace plot is seldom used in meta-analysis, yet it is a very informative plot. In this article, we define and illustrate what the trace plot is, and discuss why it is important. The Bayesian version of the plot combines the posterior density of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math>, the between-study standard deviation, and the shrunken estimates of the study effects as a function of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math>. With a small or moderate number of studies, <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math> is not estimated with much precision, and parameter estimates and shrunken study effect estimates can vary widely depending on the correct value of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math>. The trace plot allows visualization of the sensitivity to <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math> along with a plot that shows which values of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n </mrow></math> are plausible and which are implausible. A comparable frequentist or empirical Bayes version provides similar results. The concepts are illustrated using examples in meta-analysis and meta-regression; implementation in <span>R</span> is facilitated in a Bayesian or frequentist framework using the <span>bayesmeta</span> and <span>metafor</span> packages, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":226,"journal":{"name":"Research Synthesis Methods","volume":"15 3","pages":"413-429"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jrsm.1693","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Synthesis Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1693","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The trace plot is seldom used in meta-analysis, yet it is a very informative plot. In this article, we define and illustrate what the trace plot is, and discuss why it is important. The Bayesian version of the plot combines the posterior density of , the between-study standard deviation, and the shrunken estimates of the study effects as a function of . With a small or moderate number of studies, is not estimated with much precision, and parameter estimates and shrunken study effect estimates can vary widely depending on the correct value of . The trace plot allows visualization of the sensitivity to along with a plot that shows which values of are plausible and which are implausible. A comparable frequentist or empirical Bayes version provides similar results. The concepts are illustrated using examples in meta-analysis and meta-regression; implementation in R is facilitated in a Bayesian or frequentist framework using the bayesmeta and metafor packages, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Research Synthesis Methods is a reputable, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the development and dissemination of methods for conducting systematic research synthesis. Our aim is to advance the knowledge and application of research synthesis methods across various disciplines.
Our journal provides a platform for the exchange of ideas and knowledge related to designing, conducting, analyzing, interpreting, reporting, and applying research synthesis. While research synthesis is commonly practiced in the health and social sciences, our journal also welcomes contributions from other fields to enrich the methodologies employed in research synthesis across scientific disciplines.
By bridging different disciplines, we aim to foster collaboration and cross-fertilization of ideas, ultimately enhancing the quality and effectiveness of research synthesis methods. Whether you are a researcher, practitioner, or stakeholder involved in research synthesis, our journal strives to offer valuable insights and practical guidance for your work.