Examining holistic developmental strengths and needs of multilingual kindergartners using the Early Development Instrument

Judith L. Perrigo , Lisa Stanley , L.Sarah Mixson , Leila Espinosa , Jordan Morales , Chandler Beck , Neal Halfon
{"title":"Examining holistic developmental strengths and needs of multilingual kindergartners using the Early Development Instrument","authors":"Judith L. Perrigo ,&nbsp;Lisa Stanley ,&nbsp;L.Sarah Mixson ,&nbsp;Leila Espinosa ,&nbsp;Jordan Morales ,&nbsp;Chandler Beck ,&nbsp;Neal Halfon","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using an asset-based framework, this study examines the holistic developmental health outcomes of young English Learners (ELs) in the United States using the Early Development Instrument (EDI), stratified by first language and neighborhood risk measured by the National Neighborhood Equity Index (NNEI). Drawing from data spanning 154 school districts across 11 states and the District of Columbia from 2016 to 2020 (<em>n</em> = 192,892 kindergartners), the analyses encompassed descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. The results highlight that EL kindergartners were more likely to be On Track in the social competence (OR = 1.17; 95 % CI = 1.13, 1.20), emotional maturity (OR = 1.26; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.30), and physical health and well-being (OR = 1.47; 95 % CI = 1.43,1.51) domains compared to non-EL kindergartners. Yet, in the communication skills and general knowledge (OR = 0.75; CI = 0.72, 0.77) and language and cognitive development (OR = 0.72; CI = 0.70, 0.74) domains, EL kindergartners were less likely to be On Track compared to non-EL kindergartners. Notably, Korean- and Mandarin-speaking kindergartners showed the highest rates of being On Track across all EDI domains. Additionally, EL kindergartners in less challenged neighborhoods were surprisingly less likely to be On Track compared to those in more adverse neighborhoods across all developmental domains. Implications of these findings, which shed light on distinctive strengths and needs, are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000900/pdfft?md5=5e2bfeddb55e49f6f45f9cc17260e675&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374023000900-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374023000900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an asset-based framework, this study examines the holistic developmental health outcomes of young English Learners (ELs) in the United States using the Early Development Instrument (EDI), stratified by first language and neighborhood risk measured by the National Neighborhood Equity Index (NNEI). Drawing from data spanning 154 school districts across 11 states and the District of Columbia from 2016 to 2020 (n = 192,892 kindergartners), the analyses encompassed descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. The results highlight that EL kindergartners were more likely to be On Track in the social competence (OR = 1.17; 95 % CI = 1.13, 1.20), emotional maturity (OR = 1.26; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.30), and physical health and well-being (OR = 1.47; 95 % CI = 1.43,1.51) domains compared to non-EL kindergartners. Yet, in the communication skills and general knowledge (OR = 0.75; CI = 0.72, 0.77) and language and cognitive development (OR = 0.72; CI = 0.70, 0.74) domains, EL kindergartners were less likely to be On Track compared to non-EL kindergartners. Notably, Korean- and Mandarin-speaking kindergartners showed the highest rates of being On Track across all EDI domains. Additionally, EL kindergartners in less challenged neighborhoods were surprisingly less likely to be On Track compared to those in more adverse neighborhoods across all developmental domains. Implications of these findings, which shed light on distinctive strengths and needs, are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 "早期发展工具 "研究多语种幼儿园儿童的整体发展优势和需求
本研究采用基于资产的框架,利用早期发展工具(EDI),按照第一语言和以全国邻里公平指数(NNEI)衡量的邻里风险进行分层,考察了美国英语学习者(ELs)的整体发展健康结果。从 2016 年到 2020 年,数据来自 11 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 154 个学区(n = 192,892 名幼儿园学生),分析包括描述性统计、皮尔森卡方检验和逻辑回归模型。结果显示,与非英语国家的幼儿园学生相比,英语国家的幼儿园学生更有可能在社交能力(OR = 1.17; 95 % CI = 1.13, 1.20)、情感成熟度(OR = 1.26; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.30)以及身体健康和幸福感(OR = 1.47; 95 % CI = 1.43,1.51)等领域处于 "正轨"。然而,在沟通技能和常识(OR = 0.75;CI = 0.72,0.77)以及语言和认知发展(OR = 0.72;CI = 0.70,0.74)领域,与非英语语言幼儿园学生相比,英语语言幼儿园学生更不可能 "上轨道"。值得注意的是,讲韩语和普通话的幼儿园学生在所有 EDI 领域的 "在轨 "率最高。此外,令人惊讶的是,在所有发展领域中,与那些居住在较不利社区的幼儿相比,居住在挑战较少社区的英语幼儿更不可能 "在轨"。这些发现揭示了独特的优势和需求,对其影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1