Polymorphisms in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene produce different experiences of opioids: A human laboratory phenotype–genotype assessment

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Addiction Biology Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1111/adb.13355
Kelly E. Dunn, Andrew S. Huhn, Patrick H. Finan, Ami Mange, Cecilia L. Bergeria, Brion S. Maher, Jill A. Rabinowitz, Eric C. Strain, Denis Antoine
{"title":"Polymorphisms in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene produce different experiences of opioids: A human laboratory phenotype–genotype assessment","authors":"Kelly E. Dunn,&nbsp;Andrew S. Huhn,&nbsp;Patrick H. Finan,&nbsp;Ami Mange,&nbsp;Cecilia L. Bergeria,&nbsp;Brion S. Maher,&nbsp;Jill A. Rabinowitz,&nbsp;Eric C. Strain,&nbsp;Denis Antoine","doi":"10.1111/adb.13355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Allelic variations in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene change opioid signaling; however, evaluations of how allelic differences may influence opioid effects are lacking. This human laboratory paradigm examined whether the AA versus AG/GG genotypes determined opioid response profiles. Individuals with limited opioid exposure (N = 100) completed a five-day within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, residential study. Participants were admitted (Day 1), received 4 mg hydromorphone (Day 2) and 0 mg, 2 mg and 8 mg hydromorphone in randomized order (Days 3–5) and completed self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) ratings and Likert scales, observed VAS, and physiological responses at baseline and for 6.5 h post-dose. Outcomes were analysed as peak/nadir effects over time as a function of genotype (available for N = 96 individuals; AG/GG = 13.5%, AA = 86.4%). Participants with AG/GG rated low and moderate doses of hydromorphone as significantly more positive (e.g., Good Effects VAS, coasting, drive, friendly, talkative, stimulation) with fewer negative effects (e.g., itchy skin, nausea, sleepiness), and were also observed as being more talkative and energetic relative to persons with AA. Persons with AG/GG were less physiologically reactive as determined by diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, but had more changes in core temperature compared with those with AA. Persons with AA also demonstrated more prototypic agonist effects across doses; persons with AG/GG showed limited response to 2 mg and 4 mg. Data suggest persons with AG/GG genotype experienced more pleasant and fewer unpleasant responses to hydromorphone relative to persons with AA. Future studies should replicate these laboratory findings in clinical populations to support a precision medicine approach to opioid prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7289,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Biology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/adb.13355","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/adb.13355","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allelic variations in the A118G SNP of the OPRM1 gene change opioid signaling; however, evaluations of how allelic differences may influence opioid effects are lacking. This human laboratory paradigm examined whether the AA versus AG/GG genotypes determined opioid response profiles. Individuals with limited opioid exposure (N = 100) completed a five-day within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, residential study. Participants were admitted (Day 1), received 4 mg hydromorphone (Day 2) and 0 mg, 2 mg and 8 mg hydromorphone in randomized order (Days 3–5) and completed self-reported visual analog scale (VAS) ratings and Likert scales, observed VAS, and physiological responses at baseline and for 6.5 h post-dose. Outcomes were analysed as peak/nadir effects over time as a function of genotype (available for N = 96 individuals; AG/GG = 13.5%, AA = 86.4%). Participants with AG/GG rated low and moderate doses of hydromorphone as significantly more positive (e.g., Good Effects VAS, coasting, drive, friendly, talkative, stimulation) with fewer negative effects (e.g., itchy skin, nausea, sleepiness), and were also observed as being more talkative and energetic relative to persons with AA. Persons with AG/GG were less physiologically reactive as determined by diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, but had more changes in core temperature compared with those with AA. Persons with AA also demonstrated more prototypic agonist effects across doses; persons with AG/GG showed limited response to 2 mg and 4 mg. Data suggest persons with AG/GG genotype experienced more pleasant and fewer unpleasant responses to hydromorphone relative to persons with AA. Future studies should replicate these laboratory findings in clinical populations to support a precision medicine approach to opioid prescribing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OPRM1 基因 A118G SNP 的多态性会产生不同的阿片类药物体验:人类实验室表型-基因型评估
OPRM1 基因 A118G SNP 的等位基因变异会改变阿片类药物的信号转导;然而,目前还缺乏对等位基因差异如何影响阿片类药物作用的评估。本人体实验室范例研究了 AA 与 AG/GG 基因型是否决定了阿片类药物的反应特征。阿片类药物暴露有限的个体(N = 100)完成了一项为期五天的受试者内、双盲、安慰剂对照、居住研究。参与者入院(第 1 天),按随机顺序接受 4 毫克氢吗啡酮(第 2 天)、0 毫克、2 毫克和 8 毫克氢吗啡酮(第 3-5 天),并完成自我报告的视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分和李克特量表、观察到的 VAS 以及基线和用药后 6.5 小时内的生理反应。结果按基因型随时间变化的峰值/最低值效应进行分析(N = 96 人;AG/GG = 13.5%,AA = 86.4%)。AG/GG 参与者对低剂量和中等剂量氢吗啡酮的评价明显更积极(例如,良好作用 VAS、平稳、驱动力、友好、健谈、刺激),负面作用(例如,皮肤瘙痒、恶心、嗜睡)更少,而且与 AA 患者相比,他们也更健谈和精力充沛。根据舒张压和心率的测定,AG/GG 患者的生理反应较小,但与 AA 患者相比,核心体温的变化更大。AA 基因携带者在不同剂量下也表现出更多的原型激动剂效应;AG/GG 基因携带者对 2 毫克和 4 毫克的反应有限。数据表明,与 AA 型患者相比,AG/GG 基因型患者对氢吗啡酮产生的愉快反应更多,不愉快反应更少。未来的研究应在临床人群中复制这些实验室发现,以支持阿片类药物处方的精准医学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Biology
Addiction Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Biology is focused on neuroscience contributions and it aims to advance our understanding of the action of drugs of abuse and addictive processes. Papers are accepted in both animal experimentation or clinical research. The content is geared towards behavioral, molecular, genetic, biochemical, neuro-biological and pharmacology aspects of these fields. Addiction Biology includes peer-reviewed original research reports and reviews. Addiction Biology is published on behalf of the Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and other Drugs (SSA). Members of the Society for the Study of Addiction receive the Journal as part of their annual membership subscription.
期刊最新文献
N-acetylcysteine as a treatment for substance use cravings: A meta-analysis The potential mechanisms underlying the effect of acute alcohol use on duration perception Key insights into cannabis-cancer pathobiology and genotoxicity Multi-domain predictors of grip strength differentiate individuals with and without alcohol use disorder Integration of pharmacochemistry, pharmacodynamics and metabolomics to reveal active ingredients and mechanism of Nan Bao detox capsule alleviating methamphetamine addiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1