Risk factors for unsuppressed viral load after intensive adherence counseling among HIV infected persons in Kampala, Uganda: a nested case–control study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES AIDS Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s12981-023-00583-3
Jonathan Izudi, Barbara Castelnuovo, Rachel King, Adithya Cattamanchi
{"title":"Risk factors for unsuppressed viral load after intensive adherence counseling among HIV infected persons in Kampala, Uganda: a nested case–control study","authors":"Jonathan Izudi, Barbara Castelnuovo, Rachel King, Adithya Cattamanchi","doi":"10.1186/s12981-023-00583-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive adherence counseling (IAC) is the global standard of care for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) who have unsuppressed VL after ≥ 6 months of first-line anti-retroviral therapy (ART). We investigated whether the number of IAC sessions is associated with suppressed VL among PLHIV in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted a nested case-control study among PLHIV with unsuppressed VL after ≥ 3 IAC sessions (cases) and a 2:1 random sample of PLHIV with suppressed VL after ≥ 3 IAC sessions (controls). Unsuppressed VL was defined as VL ≥ 1000 copies/ml. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify factors that differed significantly between cases and controls. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the 16 cases and 32 controls including mean age, sex, baseline CD4 count, VL before IAC, and WHO clinical stage. Only the number of IAC sessions differed significantly between cases and controls in unadjusted (p = 0.012) and adjusted (p = 0.016) analyses. Each unit increase in IAC session was associated with unsuppressed VL (Adjusted odds ratio 5.09; 95% CI 1.35–19.10). VL remained unsuppressed despite increasing IAC frequency. The fidelity to standardized IAC protocol besides drug resistance testing among PLHIV with unsuppressed VL before IAC commencement should be examined.","PeriodicalId":7503,"journal":{"name":"AIDS Research and Therapy","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-023-00583-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive adherence counseling (IAC) is the global standard of care for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV) who have unsuppressed VL after ≥ 6 months of first-line anti-retroviral therapy (ART). We investigated whether the number of IAC sessions is associated with suppressed VL among PLHIV in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted a nested case-control study among PLHIV with unsuppressed VL after ≥ 3 IAC sessions (cases) and a 2:1 random sample of PLHIV with suppressed VL after ≥ 3 IAC sessions (controls). Unsuppressed VL was defined as VL ≥ 1000 copies/ml. We performed multivariable logistic regression to identify factors that differed significantly between cases and controls. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar among the 16 cases and 32 controls including mean age, sex, baseline CD4 count, VL before IAC, and WHO clinical stage. Only the number of IAC sessions differed significantly between cases and controls in unadjusted (p = 0.012) and adjusted (p = 0.016) analyses. Each unit increase in IAC session was associated with unsuppressed VL (Adjusted odds ratio 5.09; 95% CI 1.35–19.10). VL remained unsuppressed despite increasing IAC frequency. The fidelity to standardized IAC protocol besides drug resistance testing among PLHIV with unsuppressed VL before IAC commencement should be examined.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达坎帕拉艾滋病毒感染者接受强化坚持咨询后病毒载量未得到抑制的风险因素:一项巢式病例对照研究
强化依从性咨询(IAC)是针对接受一线抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)≥ 6 个月后 VL 仍未得到抑制的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染者(PLHIV)的全球标准治疗方法。我们调查了 IAC 治疗次数是否与乌干达坎帕拉的 PLHIV VL 抑制情况有关。我们对经过≥ 3 次 IAC 治疗后 VL 未得到抑制的 PLHIV(病例)和经过≥ 3 次 IAC 治疗后 VL 得到抑制的 PLHIV(对照)进行了巢式病例对照研究。未抑制的 VL 被定义为 VL ≥ 1000 拷贝/毫升。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定在病例和对照组之间存在显著差异的因素。16例病例和32例对照组的人口统计学和临床特征相似,包括平均年龄、性别、基线CD4计数、IAC前VL和WHO临床分期。在未调整分析(p = 0.012)和调整分析(p = 0.016)中,只有 IAC 次数在病例和对照组之间存在显著差异。IAC 次数每增加一个单位都与未抑制的 VL 有关(调整后的几率比 5.09;95% CI 1.35-19.10)。尽管增加了 IAC 频率,但 VL 仍未得到抑制。除了在开始 IAC 前对 VL 未得到抑制的 PLHIV 进行耐药性检测外,还应检查标准化 IAC 方案的忠实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AIDS Research and Therapy
AIDS Research and Therapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: AIDS Research and Therapy publishes articles on basic science, translational, clinical, social, epidemiological, behavioral and educational sciences articles focused on the treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS, and the search for the cure. The Journal publishes articles on novel and developing treatment strategies for AIDS as well as on the outcomes of established treatment strategies. Original research articles on animal models that form an essential part of the AIDS treatment research are also considered
期刊最新文献
Ixekizumab: an alternative for HIV-positive psoriasis patients. Brief communication: efficacy and safety of the dolutegravir/lamivudine dual therapy in antiretroviral treatment-experienced Chinese people living with HIV. Compliance with reporting standards in Mobile App interventions for ART Adherence among PLHIV. Traditional complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM) use among PLHIV on antiretroviral medication. Clustering affordable care act qualified health plans to understand how and where insurance facilitates or impedes access to HIV prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1