Leadership, communication, and science: three pillars essential to public health emergency response and closing the gap in the HIV response among key populations

Tafadzwa Dzinamarira , Enos Moyo , Perseverance Moyo , Munashe Chimene , Grant Murewanhema
{"title":"Leadership, communication, and science: three pillars essential to public health emergency response and closing the gap in the HIV response among key populations","authors":"Tafadzwa Dzinamarira ,&nbsp;Enos Moyo ,&nbsp;Perseverance Moyo ,&nbsp;Munashe Chimene ,&nbsp;Grant Murewanhema","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Globally, there have been multiple public health emergencies in recent decades. High rates of morbidity, occasionally mortality, and economic instability are usually associated with pandemics. One of the epidemics that has significantly increased morbidity and mortality worldwide is the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic. HIV has a disproportionately negative impact on key populations. Strong leadership, effective communication, and sound science are necessary for public health emergency (PHE) responses to be successful. These three PHE response pillars are also essential for bridging the HIV response gap among key populations in the setting of restrictive laws. In this review, we explored the importance of these three pillars of successful PHEs responses, and how they are essential to closing the gap in the HIV response among key populations. Leaders must make decisions and instil a sense of authority in the populace during PHEs to foster trust and confidence. Leaders should base their choices on scientific evidence. Effective communication during PHEs should be proactive, polite, imaginative, innovative, and constructive. To address gaps in the HIV response among key populations, leaders must create a supportive environment for effective communication and scientific research, communication should be used to raise awareness of HIV and to dispel stigma and discrimination, while science should provide evidence of efficacy and effectiveness of interventions among key populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 182-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644723000921/pdfft?md5=c397bf0da6bd805a8e75691c5c39edaa&pid=1-s2.0-S2414644723000921-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644723000921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, there have been multiple public health emergencies in recent decades. High rates of morbidity, occasionally mortality, and economic instability are usually associated with pandemics. One of the epidemics that has significantly increased morbidity and mortality worldwide is the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) pandemic. HIV has a disproportionately negative impact on key populations. Strong leadership, effective communication, and sound science are necessary for public health emergency (PHE) responses to be successful. These three PHE response pillars are also essential for bridging the HIV response gap among key populations in the setting of restrictive laws. In this review, we explored the importance of these three pillars of successful PHEs responses, and how they are essential to closing the gap in the HIV response among key populations. Leaders must make decisions and instil a sense of authority in the populace during PHEs to foster trust and confidence. Leaders should base their choices on scientific evidence. Effective communication during PHEs should be proactive, polite, imaginative, innovative, and constructive. To address gaps in the HIV response among key populations, leaders must create a supportive environment for effective communication and scientific research, communication should be used to raise awareness of HIV and to dispel stigma and discrimination, while science should provide evidence of efficacy and effectiveness of interventions among key populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领导力、沟通和科学:公共卫生应急和缩小关键人群中艾滋病毒防治差距的三大支柱
近几十年来,全球发生了多起公共卫生突发事件。高发病率、偶尔高死亡率和经济不稳定通常与流行病有关。人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病)大流行是显著增加全球发病率和死亡率的流行病之一。艾滋病毒对重点人群的负面影响尤为严重。强有力的领导、有效的沟通和可靠的科学是公共卫生应急(PHE)措施取得成功的必要条件。这三个公共卫生应急支柱对于在限制性法律环境下缩小关键人群中的艾滋病应对差距也至关重要。在本综述中,我们探讨了成功的公共卫生紧急事件应对措施中这三大支柱的重要性,以及它们如何对缩小关键人群中的艾滋病应对差距至关重要。在公共健康教育期间,领导者必须做出决策并向民众灌输权威意识,以促进信任和信心。领导者应根据科学证据做出选择。公共健康教育期间的有效沟通应是积极主动、礼貌、富有想象力、创新和建设性的。为了弥补重点人群在艾滋病防治方面的不足,领导者必须为有效沟通和科学研究创造一个有利的环境,应利用沟通来提高人们对艾滋病的认识,消除耻辱感和歧视,而科学则应为重点人群干预措施的效力和有效性提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building a transdisciplinary science of One Health with a global vision Mobile health interventions for improving maternal and child health outcomes in South Africa: a systematic review Plain language in the healthcare of Japan: a systematic review of “plain Japanese” Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of urinary arsenic concentration for elementary school children in Bangladesh Shared decision making in rural general practices: a qualitative exploration of older rural South Australians’ perceived involvement in clinical consultations with doctors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1