Time in Tight Glucose Range in Type 1 Diabetes: Predictive Factors and Achievable Targets in Real-World Users of the MiniMed 780G System

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.2337/dc23-1581
Javier Castañeda, Arcelia Arrieta, Tim van den Heuvel, Tadej Battelino, Ohad Cohen
{"title":"Time in Tight Glucose Range in Type 1 Diabetes: Predictive Factors and Achievable Targets in Real-World Users of the MiniMed 780G System","authors":"Javier Castañeda, Arcelia Arrieta, Tim van den Heuvel, Tadej Battelino, Ohad Cohen","doi":"10.2337/dc23-1581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE We studied time in tight range (TITR; 70–140 mg/dL) in real-world users of the MiniMed 780G system (MM780G). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CareLink Personal data were extracted (August 2020 to December 2022) to examine TITR and its relationship with time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL), factors predicting higher TITR, and which TITR target is a reasonable treatment goal. RESULTS The 13,461 users (3,762 age ≤15 years and 9,699 age >15 years) showed an average TITR of 48.9% in those age ≤15 years and 48.8% in the older group (vs. TIR 71.2% and 73.9%, respectively). Consistent use of a glucose target (GT) of 100 mg/dL and active insulin time (AIT) of 2 h were the most relevant factors predicting higher TITR (P < 0.0001). In users consistently applying these optimal settings, TITR was 56.7% in those age ≤15 years and 57.0% in the older group, and the relative impact of these settings on TITR was 60% and 86% greater than that on TIR, respectively. TITRs of ∼45% (age ≤15 years 46.3% and older group 45.4%), ∼50% (50.7% and 50.7%) and ∼55% (56.4% and 58.0%) were best associated with glucose management indicators <7.0%, <6.8%, and <6.5%, respectively. TITRs of >45%, >50%, and >55% were achieved in 91%, 74%, and 55% of those age ≤15 years and 93%, 81%, and 57% of older group users, respectively, at optimal settings. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that 1) mean TIR is high with a high mean TITR in MM780G users (>48%), 2) consistent use of optimal GT/AIT improves TITR (>56%), 3) the impact of these settings on TITR is larger than on TIR, and 4) a TITR target >50% is our suggested treatment goal.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-1581","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We studied time in tight range (TITR; 70–140 mg/dL) in real-world users of the MiniMed 780G system (MM780G). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CareLink Personal data were extracted (August 2020 to December 2022) to examine TITR and its relationship with time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL), factors predicting higher TITR, and which TITR target is a reasonable treatment goal. RESULTS The 13,461 users (3,762 age ≤15 years and 9,699 age >15 years) showed an average TITR of 48.9% in those age ≤15 years and 48.8% in the older group (vs. TIR 71.2% and 73.9%, respectively). Consistent use of a glucose target (GT) of 100 mg/dL and active insulin time (AIT) of 2 h were the most relevant factors predicting higher TITR (P < 0.0001). In users consistently applying these optimal settings, TITR was 56.7% in those age ≤15 years and 57.0% in the older group, and the relative impact of these settings on TITR was 60% and 86% greater than that on TIR, respectively. TITRs of ∼45% (age ≤15 years 46.3% and older group 45.4%), ∼50% (50.7% and 50.7%) and ∼55% (56.4% and 58.0%) were best associated with glucose management indicators <7.0%, <6.8%, and <6.5%, respectively. TITRs of >45%, >50%, and >55% were achieved in 91%, 74%, and 55% of those age ≤15 years and 93%, 81%, and 57% of older group users, respectively, at optimal settings. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that 1) mean TIR is high with a high mean TITR in MM780G users (>48%), 2) consistent use of optimal GT/AIT improves TITR (>56%), 3) the impact of these settings on TITR is larger than on TIR, and 4) a TITR target >50% is our suggested treatment goal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1 型糖尿病患者血糖控制在严格范围内的时间:MiniMed 780G 系统实际用户的预测因素和可实现目标
目的 我们研究了 MiniMed 780G 系统(MM780G)实际用户的血压紧张范围时间(TITR;70-140 mg/dL)。研究设计和方法 提取 CareLink 个人数据(2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月),研究 TITR 及其与在量程内时间(TIR;70-180 mg/dL)的关系、预测较高 TITR 的因素以及哪个 TITR 目标是合理的治疗目标。结果 13,461 名用户(3,762 名年龄小于 15 岁,9,699 名年龄大于等于 15 岁)显示,年龄小于 15 岁组的平均 TITR 为 48.9%,年龄较大组的平均 TITR 为 48.8%(对比 TIR 分别为 71.2% 和 73.9%)。持续使用 100 mg/dL 的目标血糖 (GT) 和 2 小时的有效胰岛素时间 (AIT) 是预测较高 TITR 的最相关因素(P < 0.0001)。在坚持使用这些最佳设置的用户中,年龄小于 15 岁组的 TITR 为 56.7%,年龄大于 15 岁组的 TITR 为 57.0%,这些设置对 TITR 的相对影响分别比对 TIR 的影响大 60% 和 86%。与血糖管理指标<7.0%、<6.8%和<6.5%最相关的TITR分别为∼45%(年龄≤15岁为46.3%,老年组为45.4%)、∼50%(50.7%和50.7%)和∼55%(56.4%和58.0%)。在最佳设置下,91%、74% 和 55% 的 15 岁以下人群以及 93%、81% 和 57% 的老年群体用户的 TITR 分别达到了 >45%、>50% 和 >55%。结论 本研究表明:1)MM780G 用户的平均 TIR 高,平均 TITR 也高(>48%);2)持续使用最佳 GT/AIT 可提高 TITR(>56%);3)这些设置对 TITR 的影响大于对 TIR 的影响;4)我们建议的治疗目标是 TITR 目标值>50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
The Supporting Emerging Adults With Diabetes (SEAD) Program: An Adult-Based Real-World Clinical Model That Improves Hospitalizations, Diabetes Technology Uptake, and Glycemic Outcomes in Underserved Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Accelerated Longitudinal Glycemic Changes in Relation to Urinary Toxic/Essential Metals and Metal Mixtures Among Mexican Americans Living in Starr County, Texas Glycemic and Psychosocial Outcomes of Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop Therapy in Youth With High HbA1c: A Randomized Clinical Trial Erratum. A Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of the Benefits of Two Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems in Glucose Control and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Real-world Setting. Diabetes Care 2024;47:216–224 Choline Metabolites and 15-Year Risk of Incident Diabetes in a Prospective Cohort of Adults: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1