Help-seeker satisfaction with diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2023.2292964
Natalie Carmody, Michael Hunter, Robert H Eikelboom
{"title":"Help-seeker satisfaction with diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus.","authors":"Natalie Carmody, Michael Hunter, Robert H Eikelboom","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2292964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine help-seeker satisfaction with the first communication of a tinnitus diagnosis by a healthcare provider, whether help-seekers undertook treatment and how they rated this treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A survey design assessed tinnitus characteristics and distress, health status, help-seeking, diagnosis communication, treatment and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>A self-selected cohort and a population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Satisfaction scores were examined against demographic, clinical factors, and type of healthcare provider. A total of 281 adults participated (median age 61.6, IQR = 10.8 years), 52.3% sought help for tinnitus and 22.4% received treatment. The most frequently seen healthcare providers were general practitioners (34.0%), audiologists (29.3%) and ear, nose and throat specialists (25.9%). About two-thirds (64.1%) of help-seekers were unsatisfied with the first communication of a tinnitus diagnosis they received, and 56.5% rated their first tinnitus treatment as poor. Help-seekers were significantly more satisfied with audiologists than other providers regarding the communication of the first tinnitus diagnosis. Higher tinnitus distress scores were significantly associated with lower patient satisfaction with communication of first tinnitus diagnosis. No other factors were associated with patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are significant communication barriers along the tinnitus clinical pathway. Identifying and addressing these barriers could improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1019-1026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2292964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine help-seeker satisfaction with the first communication of a tinnitus diagnosis by a healthcare provider, whether help-seekers undertook treatment and how they rated this treatment.

Design: A survey design assessed tinnitus characteristics and distress, health status, help-seeking, diagnosis communication, treatment and patient satisfaction.

Study sample: A self-selected cohort and a population-based cohort.

Results: Satisfaction scores were examined against demographic, clinical factors, and type of healthcare provider. A total of 281 adults participated (median age 61.6, IQR = 10.8 years), 52.3% sought help for tinnitus and 22.4% received treatment. The most frequently seen healthcare providers were general practitioners (34.0%), audiologists (29.3%) and ear, nose and throat specialists (25.9%). About two-thirds (64.1%) of help-seekers were unsatisfied with the first communication of a tinnitus diagnosis they received, and 56.5% rated their first tinnitus treatment as poor. Help-seekers were significantly more satisfied with audiologists than other providers regarding the communication of the first tinnitus diagnosis. Higher tinnitus distress scores were significantly associated with lower patient satisfaction with communication of first tinnitus diagnosis. No other factors were associated with patient satisfaction.

Conclusion: There are significant communication barriers along the tinnitus clinical pathway. Identifying and addressing these barriers could improve patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助者对耳鸣诊断和治疗的满意度。
目的研究求助者对医护人员首次告知耳鸣诊断结果的满意度、求助者是否接受了治疗以及他们对治疗的评价:调查设计:评估耳鸣特征和痛苦、健康状况、求助、诊断沟通、治疗和患者满意度:研究样本:自选队列和基于人口的队列:结果:根据人口统计学、临床因素和医疗服务提供者类型对满意度评分进行了研究。共有 281 名成年人参与(中位年龄 61.6 岁,IRQ = 10.8 岁),52.3% 的人因耳鸣寻求帮助,22.4% 的人接受了治疗。最常见的医疗服务提供者是全科医生(34.0%)、听力学家(29.3%)和耳鼻喉科专家(25.9%)。约有三分之二(64.1%)的求助者对首次耳鸣诊断沟通不满意,56.5%的求助者认为首次耳鸣治疗效果不佳。在首次耳鸣诊断的沟通方面,求助者对听力学家的满意度明显高于其他医疗服务提供者。耳鸣困扰得分越高,患者对首次耳鸣诊断沟通的满意度就越低。其他因素均与患者满意度无关:结论:耳鸣临床治疗过程中存在严重的沟通障碍。结论:耳鸣临床路径中存在严重的沟通障碍,识别并解决这些障碍可提高患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Exploring factors influencing hearing Aid uptake: insights from a Korean population with unilateral and bilateral hearing loss. Parent-led ear health checks at home for children with complex needs pilot-project: a new approach to improving access to ear health. Correction. Sentence intelligibility in noise in children: development of the LIST-k. Predictors of hearing loss disability: a multinational study using the ICF core set.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1