Comparison of the effect of mint extract and chamomile drops on the gastric residual volume of traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube feeding in the intensive care unit: A triple -blind, randomized, crossover trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.22038/AJP.2023.21889
Abbasali Ebrahimian, Samaneh Rahbar, Setareh Homami, Fatemeh Paknazar, Ali Fakhr-Movahedi
{"title":"Comparison of the effect of mint extract and chamomile drops on the gastric residual volume of traumatic patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube feeding in the intensive care unit: A triple -blind, randomized, crossover trial.","authors":"Abbasali Ebrahimian, Samaneh Rahbar, Setareh Homami, Fatemeh Paknazar, Ali Fakhr-Movahedi","doi":"10.22038/AJP.2023.21889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mint and chamomile can effectively reduce the gastric residual volume (GRV). This study aimed to determine the effect of mint extract and chamomile drops on the GRV of trauma patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube feeding in the intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a triple-blinded randomized clinical trial with a 2×2 crossover design. Eighty patients were randomly divided to receive mint extract and chamomile drops. Five drops of mint extract and 11 drops of chamomile were gavaged every 6 hr. GRV was measured using a syringe-aspiration method before and 3 hr after each intervention. After a 24-hour washout period, the two groups changed places.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first phase of the study, before the interventions, the GRV in the mint and chamomile groups was 14.60±7.89 and 13.79±7.12 ml, and after the interventions were 8.13±6.31 and 6.61±4.68 ml, respectively. In the study's second phase, before the interventions, the GRV in the mint and chamomile groups was 10.03±4.93 and 11.46±7.17 ml and after the interventions, GRV was 4.97±4.05 and 6.98±4.60 ml, respectively. The difference in the GRV before and after the intervention was not significantly different between the two groups. Both herbal drugs effectively reduced the GRV (p=0.382).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mint extract and chamomile drops are similarly effective in reducing the GRV in trauma patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding in the intensive care unit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8677,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10711581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AJP.2023.21889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Mint and chamomile can effectively reduce the gastric residual volume (GRV). This study aimed to determine the effect of mint extract and chamomile drops on the GRV of trauma patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube feeding in the intensive care unit.

Materials and methods: This study was a triple-blinded randomized clinical trial with a 2×2 crossover design. Eighty patients were randomly divided to receive mint extract and chamomile drops. Five drops of mint extract and 11 drops of chamomile were gavaged every 6 hr. GRV was measured using a syringe-aspiration method before and 3 hr after each intervention. After a 24-hour washout period, the two groups changed places.

Results: In the first phase of the study, before the interventions, the GRV in the mint and chamomile groups was 14.60±7.89 and 13.79±7.12 ml, and after the interventions were 8.13±6.31 and 6.61±4.68 ml, respectively. In the study's second phase, before the interventions, the GRV in the mint and chamomile groups was 10.03±4.93 and 11.46±7.17 ml and after the interventions, GRV was 4.97±4.05 and 6.98±4.60 ml, respectively. The difference in the GRV before and after the intervention was not significantly different between the two groups. Both herbal drugs effectively reduced the GRV (p=0.382).

Conclusion: Mint extract and chamomile drops are similarly effective in reducing the GRV in trauma patients under mechanical ventilation and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding in the intensive care unit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较薄荷提取物和甘菊滴剂对在重症监护室接受机械通气和鼻胃管喂养的创伤患者胃残余容积的影响:三盲、随机、交叉试验。
目的薄荷和洋甘菊能有效降低胃残余容积(GRV)。本研究旨在确定薄荷提取物和洋甘菊滴剂对重症监护病房接受机械通气和鼻胃管喂养的创伤患者胃残余容积的影响:本研究是一项三盲随机临床试验,采用 2×2 交叉设计。80 名患者被随机分配接受薄荷提取物和洋甘菊滴剂。每 6 小时灌服 5 滴薄荷提取物和 11 滴洋甘菊。在每次干预前和干预后 3 小时,使用注射器抽吸法测量 GRV。经过 24 小时的冲洗期后,两组交换位置:在研究的第一阶段,干预前,薄荷组和洋甘菊组的 GRV 分别为 14.60±7.89 毫升和 13.79±7.12 毫升,干预后分别为 8.13±6.31 毫升和 6.61±4.68 毫升。在研究的第二阶段,干预前,薄荷组和洋甘菊组的 GRV 分别为 10.03±4.93 毫升和 11.46±7.17 毫升,干预后,GRV 分别为 4.97±4.05 毫升和 6.98±4.60 毫升。两组干预前后的 GRV 差异不大。两种草药均有效降低了 GRV(P=0.382):结论:薄荷提取物和洋甘菊滴剂在减少重症监护室中接受机械通气和鼻胃管(NGT)喂养的创伤患者的 GRV 方面具有相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aloe vera supplementation improves cardiovascular risk factors in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. An in vitro antiviral evaluation of punicalagin toward influenza A virus. Apigenin attenuates serum concentrations of TNF-a, interleukin 1b and interleukin 6 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated rats. Comparison of effects of P-coumaric acid and coumarin on colorectal cancer cell line by inducing apoptosis and autophagy. Effect of pretreatment with Devil's Claw on locomotor activity, infarct volume, and neuronal density in focal cerebral ischemia in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1