SARS-Cov-2 Cycle Threshold Value and Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients.

Ali Goljanian Tabrizi, Maliheh Mohseni Ashjerdi, Matin Ghazizadeh, Majid Maleki
{"title":"SARS-Cov-2 Cycle Threshold Value and Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Ali Goljanian Tabrizi, Maliheh Mohseni Ashjerdi, Matin Ghazizadeh, Majid Maleki","doi":"10.22038/IJORL.2023.71462.3429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering the inconsistent results regarding the association between the severity and duration of olfactory dysfunction (OD), and the viral load in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, we aimed to conduct this study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study in which COVID-19 patients were evaluated for the initial cycle threshold value (Ct values) measured by the nasopharyngeal samples along with olfactory function measured by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) within 2 months of COVID-19 onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 309 COVID-19 patients who were included in this study, 108 (34.9%), 112 (36.2%) and 89 (28.8%) were normosmic, hyposmic, and anosmic, respectively based on the UPSIT. The severity of COVID-19 and the rate of hospitalization were higher in anosmic patients (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Moreover, significant associations between the initial Ct value and the severity of OD at admission and follow-ups were detected (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Anosmic patients had higher Ct values in comparison with hyposmic (approx. 3-fold) and normosmic (approx. 12-fold) patients. The recovery rate after one- and two-month follow-ups was 47% and 84%, respectively. At the follow-ups, OD-recovered patients significantly had lower Ct values (mean Ct value: 27.79 ± 2 and 28.21 ± 2.08) in comparison with those who have not recovered yet (mean Ct value: 30.19 ± 3.36, and 33.6 ± 3.37) (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ct value seems to be a significant factor not only in predicting OD severity in COVID-19 patients but also in the OD recovery duration. This finding may be helpful to investigate the underlying mechanisms of OD in COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"35 130","pages":"263-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2023.71462.3429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the inconsistent results regarding the association between the severity and duration of olfactory dysfunction (OD), and the viral load in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, we aimed to conduct this study.

Materials and methods: This is a prospective cohort study in which COVID-19 patients were evaluated for the initial cycle threshold value (Ct values) measured by the nasopharyngeal samples along with olfactory function measured by the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) within 2 months of COVID-19 onset.

Results: Among 309 COVID-19 patients who were included in this study, 108 (34.9%), 112 (36.2%) and 89 (28.8%) were normosmic, hyposmic, and anosmic, respectively based on the UPSIT. The severity of COVID-19 and the rate of hospitalization were higher in anosmic patients (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Moreover, significant associations between the initial Ct value and the severity of OD at admission and follow-ups were detected (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively). Anosmic patients had higher Ct values in comparison with hyposmic (approx. 3-fold) and normosmic (approx. 12-fold) patients. The recovery rate after one- and two-month follow-ups was 47% and 84%, respectively. At the follow-ups, OD-recovered patients significantly had lower Ct values (mean Ct value: 27.79 ± 2 and 28.21 ± 2.08) in comparison with those who have not recovered yet (mean Ct value: 30.19 ± 3.36, and 33.6 ± 3.37) (p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions: Ct value seems to be a significant factor not only in predicting OD severity in COVID-19 patients but also in the OD recovery duration. This finding may be helpful to investigate the underlying mechanisms of OD in COVID-19 patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-Cov-2周期阈值与COVID-19患者的嗅觉功能障碍
导言:考虑到嗅觉功能障碍(OD)的严重程度和持续时间与冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)患者病毒载量之间的关联结果不一致,我们旨在开展这项研究:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,对COVID-19患者在COVID-19发病后2个月内通过鼻咽样本测量的初始周期阈值(Ct值)以及通过宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)测量的嗅觉功能进行评估:结果:在参与本研究的 309 名 COVID-19 患者中,根据 UPSIT 的结果,分别有 108 人(34.9%)、112 人(36.2%)和 89 人(28.8%)属于正常嗅觉、低嗅觉和无嗅觉。无血症患者的 COVID-19 严重程度和住院率较高(p 结论:Ct值似乎不仅是预测COVID-19患者OD严重程度的重要因素,也是影响OD恢复时间的重要因素。这一发现可能有助于研究 COVID-19 患者 OD 的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performance of Wrist-Worn Pulse Oximeter for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Submandibular Gland Preservation in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Our Analysis at A Tertiary Care Hospital. Transnasal Endoscopic Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. Evaluation of Dentofacial Angles in Children with Severe Adenoid Hypertrophy. Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Associated Laryngeal Stenosis: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1