Alterations in circulating mitochondrial signals at hospital admission for COPD exacerbation.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14799731231220058
Carlos A Amado, Paula Martín-Audera, Juan Agüero, Diego Ferrer-Pargada, Begoña Josa Laorden, Daymara Boucle, Ana Berja, Bernardo A Lavín, Armando R Guerra, Cristina Ghadban, Pedro Muñoz, Mayte García-Unzueta
{"title":"Alterations in circulating mitochondrial signals at hospital admission for COPD exacerbation.","authors":"Carlos A Amado, Paula Martín-Audera, Juan Agüero, Diego Ferrer-Pargada, Begoña Josa Laorden, Daymara Boucle, Ana Berja, Bernardo A Lavín, Armando R Guerra, Cristina Ghadban, Pedro Muñoz, Mayte García-Unzueta","doi":"10.1177/14799731231220058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation (ECOPD) alters the natural course of the disease. To date, only C-reactive protein has been used as a biomarker in ECOPD, but it has important limitations. The mitochondria release peptides (Humanin (HN), FGF-21, GDF-15, MOTS-c and Romo1) under certain metabolic conditions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the pathophysiologic, diagnostic and prognostic value of measuring serum mitochondrial peptides at hospital admission in patients with ECOPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 51 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital for ECOPD were included and followed for 1 year; in addition, 160 participants with stable COPD from our out-patient clinic were recruited as controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum FGF-21 (<i>p</i> < .001), MOTS-c (<i>p</i> < .001) and Romo1 (<i>p</i> = .002) levels were lower, and GDF-15 (<i>p</i> < .001) levels were higher, in patients with ECOPD than stable COPD, but no differences were found in HN. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, MOTS-c (AUC 0.744, 95% CI 0.679-0.802, <i>p</i> < .001) and GDF-15 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.670-0.793, <i>p</i> < .001) had the best diagnostic power for ECOPD, with a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of C-RP (AUC 0.796 95% IC 0.735-0.848, <i>p</i> < .001). FGF-21 (AUC 0.700, 95% CI 0.633-0.761, <i>p</i> < .001) and Romo1 (AUC 0.645 95% CI 0.573-0.712, <i>p</i> = .001) had lower diagnostic accuracy. HN levels did not differentiate patients with ECOPD versus stable COPD (<i>p</i> = .557). In Cox regression analysis, HN (HR 2.661, CI95% 1.009-7.016, <i>p</i> = .048) and MOTS-c (HR 3.441, CI95% 1.252-9.297, <i>p</i> = .016) levels exceeding mean levels were independent risk factors for re-admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most mitochondrial peptides are altered in ECOPD, as compared with stable COPD. MOTS-c and GDF15 levels have a diagnostic accuracy similar to C-RP for ECOPD. HN and MOTS-c independently predict future re-hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"14799731231220058"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10734331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231220058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation (ECOPD) alters the natural course of the disease. To date, only C-reactive protein has been used as a biomarker in ECOPD, but it has important limitations. The mitochondria release peptides (Humanin (HN), FGF-21, GDF-15, MOTS-c and Romo1) under certain metabolic conditions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the pathophysiologic, diagnostic and prognostic value of measuring serum mitochondrial peptides at hospital admission in patients with ECOPD.

Methods: A total of 51 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital for ECOPD were included and followed for 1 year; in addition, 160 participants with stable COPD from our out-patient clinic were recruited as controls.

Results: Serum FGF-21 (p < .001), MOTS-c (p < .001) and Romo1 (p = .002) levels were lower, and GDF-15 (p < .001) levels were higher, in patients with ECOPD than stable COPD, but no differences were found in HN. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, MOTS-c (AUC 0.744, 95% CI 0.679-0.802, p < .001) and GDF-15 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.670-0.793, p < .001) had the best diagnostic power for ECOPD, with a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of C-RP (AUC 0.796 95% IC 0.735-0.848, p < .001). FGF-21 (AUC 0.700, 95% CI 0.633-0.761, p < .001) and Romo1 (AUC 0.645 95% CI 0.573-0.712, p = .001) had lower diagnostic accuracy. HN levels did not differentiate patients with ECOPD versus stable COPD (p = .557). In Cox regression analysis, HN (HR 2.661, CI95% 1.009-7.016, p = .048) and MOTS-c (HR 3.441, CI95% 1.252-9.297, p = .016) levels exceeding mean levels were independent risk factors for re-admission.

Conclusions: Most mitochondrial peptides are altered in ECOPD, as compared with stable COPD. MOTS-c and GDF15 levels have a diagnostic accuracy similar to C-RP for ECOPD. HN and MOTS-c independently predict future re-hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺疾病恶化入院时循环线粒体信号的变化。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)恶化(ECOPD)会改变疾病的自然病程。迄今为止,只有 C 反应蛋白被用作 ECOPD 的生物标志物,但它有很大的局限性。线粒体在特定的代谢条件下会释放多肽(Humanin (HN)、FGF-21、GDF-15、MOTS-c 和 Romo1)。在此,我们旨在评估在 ECOPD 患者入院时测量血清线粒体肽的病理生理学、诊断和预后价值:方法:共纳入 51 名连续入院的 ECOPD 患者,并对其进行为期 1 年的随访;此外,还从门诊招募了 160 名慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者作为对照:ECOPD患者血清FGF-21(p < .001)、MOTS-c(p < .001)和Romo1(p = .002)水平低于稳定型COPD患者,GDF-15(p < .001)水平高于稳定型COPD患者,但在HN患者中未发现差异。在接收器操作特征分析中,MOTS-c(AUC 0.744,95% CI 0.679-0.802,p < .001)和 GDF-15(AUC 0.735,95% CI 0.670-0.793,p < .001)对 ECOPD 的诊断能力最强,诊断准确性与 C-RP 相似(AUC 0.796 95% IC 0.735-0.848,p < .001)。FGF-21(AUC 0.700,95% CI 0.633-0.761,p < .001)和Romo1(AUC 0.645 95% CI 0.573-0.712,p = .001)的诊断准确性较低。HN 水平并不能区分 ECOPD 和稳定型 COPD 患者(p = .557)。在Cox回归分析中,HN(HR 2.661,CI95% 1.009-7.016,p = .048)和MOTS-c(HR 3.441,CI95% 1.252-9.297,p = .016)水平超过平均水平是再次入院的独立风险因素:结论:与稳定型慢性阻塞性肺病相比,ECOPD患者的大多数线粒体肽都发生了改变。MOTS-c和GDF15水平对ECOPD的诊断准确性与C-RP相似。HN和MOTS-c可独立预测未来的再入院情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying uptake and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease known to tertiary care. Navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences and self-management approaches adopted by people with interstitial lung disease. Relationship between dust allergen sensitization and cardiac autonomic function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory impairments in patients suffering from Fabry disease - A cross-sectional study. Two-year diffusion capacity trajectory in COVID-19 pneumonia survivors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1