The attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries Questionnaire: a Turkish validity and reliability study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY Wound management & prevention Pub Date : 2023-11-01
Gülhan Erkuş Küçükkelepçe, Türkan Karaca, Semiha Aydın Özkan
{"title":"The attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries Questionnaire: a Turkish validity and reliability study.","authors":"Gülhan Erkuş Küçükkelepçe, Türkan Karaca, Semiha Aydın Özkan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The attitudes of nurses should be measured using valid and reliable tools to develop effective nursing care strategies for the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries and to organize necessary training programs.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was planned to conduct the Turkish validity and reliability study of the Attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Questionnaire (MDRPU/I Questionnaire (the English-language version)) in nurses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological study included 134 nurses working in hospitals of different sizes and characteristics (public hospitals, training and research hospitals, and university hospitals) in Turkey. The validity and reliability of the Attitude Towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries (MDRPI Questionnaire (the Turkish-language version)) Questionnaire were tested using language validity, content validity, face validity, construct validity, and reliability analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final version of the questionnaire had a content validity index of 98.03%, sufficient construct validity, and a Cronbach α value of 0.92 for the total questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of the MDRPI Questionnaire is valid, reliable, and suitable for measuring the attitudes of nurses in Turkey toward the prevention and care of medical device-related pressure injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23741,"journal":{"name":"Wound management & prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound management & prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The attitudes of nurses should be measured using valid and reliable tools to develop effective nursing care strategies for the prevention of medical device-related pressure injuries and to organize necessary training programs.

Purpose: This study was planned to conduct the Turkish validity and reliability study of the Attitude towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Ulcers/Injuries Questionnaire (MDRPU/I Questionnaire (the English-language version)) in nurses.

Methods: This methodological study included 134 nurses working in hospitals of different sizes and characteristics (public hospitals, training and research hospitals, and university hospitals) in Turkey. The validity and reliability of the Attitude Towards Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries (MDRPI Questionnaire (the Turkish-language version)) Questionnaire were tested using language validity, content validity, face validity, construct validity, and reliability analyses.

Results: The final version of the questionnaire had a content validity index of 98.03%, sufficient construct validity, and a Cronbach α value of 0.92 for the total questionnaire.

Conclusions: The Turkish version of the MDRPI Questionnaire is valid, reliable, and suitable for measuring the attitudes of nurses in Turkey toward the prevention and care of medical device-related pressure injuries.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对医疗器械相关压伤的态度问卷:土耳其有效性和可靠性研究。
背景:目的:本研究计划在土耳其开展护士对医疗器械相关压疮/压伤态度问卷(MDRPU/I 问卷(英文版))的有效性和可靠性研究:这项方法学研究包括在土耳其不同规模和特点的医院(公立医院、培训和研究医院以及大学医院)工作的 134 名护士。对医疗器械相关压伤态度问卷(MDRPI 问卷(土耳其语版))的有效性和可靠性进行了语言有效性测试。对问卷进行了语言效度、内容效度、面效度、结构效度和信度分析:最终版问卷的内容效度指数为 98.03%,具有充分的建构效度,总问卷的 Cronbach α 值为 0.92:土耳其版 MDRPI 问卷有效、可靠,适用于测量土耳其护士对预防和护理医疗器械相关压伤的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound management & prevention
Wound management & prevention Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case series describing combined negative pressure wound therapy and split-thickness skin graft as a method of sterilizing and closing midline laparotomy wounds near ostomies. A new decision tool to objectively select the most appropriate ostomy system - a survey among ostomy nurse specialists. A review of the current trends in chronic wound and scar management. Comparative occipital pressure mapping in the operating room. Early postoperative complications of elective versus emergency stoma creation: a tertiary academic center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1