Influence of image preprocessing on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features: in vivo experiments on discretization and resampling parameters

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Diagnostic and interventional radiology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI:10.4274/dir.2023.232543
Burak Koçak, Sabahattin Yüzkan, Samet Mutlu, Mehmet Karagülle, Ahmet Kala, Mehmet Kadıoğlu, Sıla Solak, Şeyma Sunman, Zişan Hayriye Temiz, Ali Kürşad Ganiyusufoğlu
{"title":"Influence of image preprocessing on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features: <i>in vivo</i> experiments on discretization and resampling parameters","authors":"Burak Koçak, Sabahattin Yüzkan, Samet Mutlu, Mehmet Karagülle, Ahmet Kala, Mehmet Kadıoğlu, Sıla Solak, Şeyma Sunman, Zişan Hayriye Temiz, Ali Kürşad Ganiyusufoğlu","doi":"10.4274/dir.2023.232543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically investigate the impact of image preprocessing parameters on the segmentation-based reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MRI scans of 50 patients were included from the multi-institutional Brain Tumor Segmentation 2021 public glioma dataset. Whole tumor volumes were manually segmented by two independent readers, with the participation of eight readers. Radiomic features were extracted from two sequences: T2-weighted (T2) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1ce). Two methods were considered for discretization: bin count (i.e., relative discretization) and bin width (i.e., absolute discretization). Ten discretization (five for each method) and five resampling parameters were varied while other parameters were fixed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for reliability analysis based on two commonly used cut-off values (0.75 and 0.90).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Image preprocessing parameters had a significant impact on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features. The bin width method yielded more reproducible features than the bin count method. In discretization experiments using the bin width on both sequences, according to the ICC cut-off values of 0.75 and 0.90, the rate of reproducible features ranged from 70% to 84% and from 35% to 57%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend as parameter values decreased (from 84 to 5 for T2; 100 to 6 for T1ce). In the resampling experiments, these ranged from 53% to 74% and from 10% to 20%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend from lower to higher parameter values (physical voxel size; from 1 x 1 x 1 to 2 x 2 x 2 mm<sup>3</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features appears to be substantially influenced by discretization and resampling parameters. Our findings indicate that the bin width method should be used for discretization and lower bin width and higher resampling values should be used to allow more reproducible features.</p>","PeriodicalId":11341,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11095065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and interventional radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically investigate the impact of image preprocessing parameters on the segmentation-based reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features.

Methods: The MRI scans of 50 patients were included from the multi-institutional Brain Tumor Segmentation 2021 public glioma dataset. Whole tumor volumes were manually segmented by two independent readers, with the participation of eight readers. Radiomic features were extracted from two sequences: T2-weighted (T2) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1ce). Two methods were considered for discretization: bin count (i.e., relative discretization) and bin width (i.e., absolute discretization). Ten discretization (five for each method) and five resampling parameters were varied while other parameters were fixed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for reliability analysis based on two commonly used cut-off values (0.75 and 0.90).

Results: Image preprocessing parameters had a significant impact on the segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features. The bin width method yielded more reproducible features than the bin count method. In discretization experiments using the bin width on both sequences, according to the ICC cut-off values of 0.75 and 0.90, the rate of reproducible features ranged from 70% to 84% and from 35% to 57%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend as parameter values decreased (from 84 to 5 for T2; 100 to 6 for T1ce). In the resampling experiments, these ranged from 53% to 74% and from 10% to 20%, respectively, with an increasing percentage trend from lower to higher parameter values (physical voxel size; from 1 x 1 x 1 to 2 x 2 x 2 mm3).

Conclusion: The segmentation-based reproducibility of radiomic features appears to be substantially influenced by discretization and resampling parameters. Our findings indicate that the bin width method should be used for discretization and lower bin width and higher resampling values should be used to allow more reproducible features.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像预处理对基于分割的放射学特征再现性的影响:关于离散化和重新取样参数的活体实验。
目的:系统研究图像预处理参数对基于分割的磁共振成像(MRI)放射学特征再现性的影响:方法:从多机构脑肿瘤分割 2021 公共胶质瘤数据集中选取 50 名患者的 MRI 扫描图像。整个肿瘤体积由两名独立读者手动分割,共有八名读者参与。从两个序列中提取放射学特征:T2加权(T2)和对比增强T1加权(T1ce)。离散化有两种方法:分仓数(即相对离散化)和分仓宽度(即绝对离散化)。在其他参数固定的情况下,改变了 10 个离散化参数(每种方法 5 个)和 5 个再采样参数。根据两个常用的临界值(0.75 和 0.90),使用类内相关系数(ICC)进行可靠性分析:结果:图像预处理参数对基于分割的放射学特征重现性有显著影响。二进制宽度法比二进制计数法得到的特征重现性更高。在两个序列上使用分段宽度的离散化实验中,根据 0.75 和 0.90 的 ICC 截断值,可重现特征的比率分别为 70% 到 84% 和 35% 到 57%,随着参数值的降低,百分比呈上升趋势(T2 从 84 到 5;T1ce 从 100 到 6)。在重采样实验中,其比例分别为53%到74%和10%到20%,随着参数值(物理体素大小;从1 x 1 x 1到2 x 2 x 2 mm3)从低到高呈上升趋势:结论:基于分割的放射线学特征再现性似乎在很大程度上受到离散化和重新取样参数的影响。我们的研究结果表明,应使用二进制宽度法进行离散化,并使用较低的二进制宽度和较高的重采样值,以提高特征的再现性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and interventional radiology
Diagnostic and interventional radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the flare sign in predicting extracapsular extension in metastatic axillary lymph nodes and nodal status on breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges associated with percutaneous nephrostomy in infants Correlation between computed tomography-based body composition parameters and hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Experimental study of a canine model for a newly designed adjustable prefenestration aortic stent graft Pre-procedure 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging improves the performance of CT-guided transthoracic biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1