Histopathological and histomorphometric investigation of the effects of different irrigation solutions on Achilles tendon healing in rats.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Joint diseases and related surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2023.1342
Yaşar Mahsut Dincel, Erdem Can, Sevil Karabag
{"title":"Histopathological and histomorphometric investigation of the effects of different irrigation solutions on Achilles tendon healing in rats.","authors":"Yaşar Mahsut Dincel, Erdem Can, Sevil Karabag","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2023.1342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of irrigation fluids containing povidone-iodine (PVP-I), rifampicin (RF), and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) used during surgery on healing on a rat Achilles tendon model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats (range, 300 to 400 g) were used in the experiment carried out between November 2022 and December 2022. The rats were divided into PVP-I, RF, CHG, and control groups, with seven rats in each group. Following the tenotomy and repair of the right Achilles tendon, the surgical site was irrigated using PVP-I, RF, CHG, or normal saline (the control group) for 2 min. All rats were sacrificed on the 21<sup>st</sup> postoperative day. The samples were evaluated histomorphometrically using the scoring system modified by Svensson, Soslowsky, and Cook and histopathologically using the Bonar and Movin classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RF group gave better results in all three scoring systems compared to the control, PVP-I, and CHG groups (p=0.008, p=0.002, and p=0.006, respectively). Cellularity, rounding, and tenocyte morphology showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group (p=0.004). While the distribution of ground substance glycosaminoglycans showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group, there was no significant difference among the other groups (p=0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrigation solutions containing PVP-I, RF, or CHG show no negative effect on Achilles tendon healing. Moreover, the findings suggest that RF irrigation can accelerate the healing process.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10746888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of irrigation fluids containing povidone-iodine (PVP-I), rifampicin (RF), and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) used during surgery on healing on a rat Achilles tendon model.

Materials and methods: Twenty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats (range, 300 to 400 g) were used in the experiment carried out between November 2022 and December 2022. The rats were divided into PVP-I, RF, CHG, and control groups, with seven rats in each group. Following the tenotomy and repair of the right Achilles tendon, the surgical site was irrigated using PVP-I, RF, CHG, or normal saline (the control group) for 2 min. All rats were sacrificed on the 21st postoperative day. The samples were evaluated histomorphometrically using the scoring system modified by Svensson, Soslowsky, and Cook and histopathologically using the Bonar and Movin classifications.

Results: The RF group gave better results in all three scoring systems compared to the control, PVP-I, and CHG groups (p=0.008, p=0.002, and p=0.006, respectively). Cellularity, rounding, and tenocyte morphology showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group (p=0.004). While the distribution of ground substance glycosaminoglycans showed a significant difference in favor of the RF group, there was no significant difference among the other groups (p=0.22).

Conclusion: Irrigation solutions containing PVP-I, RF, or CHG show no negative effect on Achilles tendon healing. Moreover, the findings suggest that RF irrigation can accelerate the healing process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同冲洗溶液对大鼠跟腱愈合影响的组织病理学和组织形态计量学研究。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨手术中使用的含聚维酮碘(PVP-I)、利福平(RF)和葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)的冲洗液对大鼠跟腱模型愈合的影响:实验使用了 28 只雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠(体重范围为 300 至 400 克),实验时间为 2022 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月。大鼠分为 PVP-I、RF、CHG 和对照组,每组 7 只。右跟腱腱鞘切除和修复后,使用 PVP-I、RF、CHG 或生理盐水(对照组)冲洗手术部位 2 分钟。所有大鼠均于术后第 21 天处死。采用 Svensson、Soslowsky 和 Cook 修改的评分系统对样本进行组织形态学评估,并采用 Bonar 和 Movin 分类法对样本进行组织病理学评估:与对照组、PVP-I 组和 CHG 组相比,RF 组在所有三个评分系统中的结果都更好(分别为 p=0.008、p=0.002 和 p=0.006)。RF组在细胞度、圆度和腱细胞形态上有显著差异(p=0.004)。虽然地层物质糖胺聚糖的分布显示 RF 组有显著差异,但其他组间无显著差异(p=0.22):结论:含有 PVP-I、RF 或 CHG 的灌洗溶液对跟腱愈合没有负面影响。结论:含有 PVP-I、RF 或 CHG 的冲洗溶液对跟腱愈合没有负面影响,而且研究结果表明,RF 冲洗可加速愈合过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison between 3D printed models and standard 2D planning in the use of metal block augments in revision knee arthroplasty. A rare mass with atypical localization: Heterotopic ossification associated with flexor hallucis longus. Anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction improves sport participation and activity levels in adolescents with recurrent patellar dislocation. Application of combined anesthesia with spontaneous breathing in the surgery of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in elderly patients. Chronic dislocations of the fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joints with successful treatment by ligament repair: A case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1