[Influence of Fetomaternal Risk Factors on Mortality and Morbidity in Extremely Preterm Infants].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1055/a-2198-9124
Paula Winkler, Eva Cloppenburg, Axel Heep, Eduard Malik, Dörte Lüdders, Matthias Lange
{"title":"[Influence of Fetomaternal Risk Factors on Mortality and Morbidity in Extremely Preterm Infants].","authors":"Paula Winkler, Eva Cloppenburg, Axel Heep, Eduard Malik, Dörte Lüdders, Matthias Lange","doi":"10.1055/a-2198-9124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery poses a challenge to the interdisciplinary team. At the edge of viability, it is crucial to take into consideration maternal and fetal risk factors when determining individual counseling and therapeutic approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At a level 4 perinatal center, all preterm infants (PI) born in the years 2017 to 2020 who had a gestational age between 23<sup>0/7</sup> and 24<sup>6/7</sup> weeks and were cared for with a curative therapeutic approach were enrolled in a retrospective observational study. Divided into two groups (23<sup>0/7</sup>-23<sup>6/7</sup> and 24<sup>0/7</sup>-24<sup>6/7</sup> weeks of gestation), the PI were compared in terms of mortality and morbidity based on maternal and fetal risk factors. Thirteen risk factors and their prognostic relevance for survival were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>41 mothers with 48 PI were included. 9 neonates received primary palliative treatment and were excluded from the analyses. The survival rates between the two groups (n=21, n=27) showed no significant difference (66.7% versus 74.1%, p=0.750). A significantly higher mortality was observed in PI with an increased number of risk factors (p=0.004), the most severe of which were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Data regarding morbidity showed no significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data regarding mortality correlate with national findings. Observed morbidity in the study population was recorded. The prediction of probability of survival is more precise when risk factors are taken into consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2198-9124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The management of pregnant women at risk of preterm delivery poses a challenge to the interdisciplinary team. At the edge of viability, it is crucial to take into consideration maternal and fetal risk factors when determining individual counseling and therapeutic approaches.

Methods: At a level 4 perinatal center, all preterm infants (PI) born in the years 2017 to 2020 who had a gestational age between 230/7 and 246/7 weeks and were cared for with a curative therapeutic approach were enrolled in a retrospective observational study. Divided into two groups (230/7-236/7 and 240/7-246/7 weeks of gestation), the PI were compared in terms of mortality and morbidity based on maternal and fetal risk factors. Thirteen risk factors and their prognostic relevance for survival were analyzed.

Results: 41 mothers with 48 PI were included. 9 neonates received primary palliative treatment and were excluded from the analyses. The survival rates between the two groups (n=21, n=27) showed no significant difference (66.7% versus 74.1%, p=0.750). A significantly higher mortality was observed in PI with an increased number of risk factors (p=0.004), the most severe of which were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Data regarding morbidity showed no significant difference.

Conclusion: Data regarding mortality correlate with national findings. Observed morbidity in the study population was recorded. The prediction of probability of survival is more precise when risk factors are taken into consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[孕产妇风险因素对极早产儿死亡率和发病率的影响]。
简介管理有早产风险的孕妇是跨学科团队面临的一项挑战。在胎儿存活的边缘,在确定个体咨询和治疗方法时,考虑母体和胎儿的风险因素至关重要:在一家四级围产中心,所有在 2017 年至 2020 年期间出生、胎龄在 230/7 周至 246/7 周之间、接受治疗性治疗方法护理的早产儿(PI)都被纳入了一项回顾性观察研究。根据母体和胎儿的风险因素,将PI分为两组(妊娠230/7-236/7周和240/7-246/7周),比较死亡率和发病率。对 13 个风险因素及其与存活率的预后相关性进行了分析:结果:共纳入了 41 位母亲的 48 例 PI。9名新生儿接受了初级姑息治疗,不在分析之列。两组(n=21、n=27)的存活率无明显差异(66.7% 对 74.1%,P=0.750)。危险因素增多的 PI 死亡率明显更高(P=0.004),其中最严重的是妊娠高血压和胎膜早破。发病率方面的数据没有明显差异:结论:有关死亡率的数据与全国的调查结果相符。结论:死亡率数据与全国调查结果相关。如果考虑到风险因素,对存活概率的预测会更加精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
期刊最新文献
[AI-supported decision-making in obstetrics - a feasibility study on the medical accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT]. [Survey on the State, Potential, and Obstacles of the Digital Transformation in Human Milk Banks]. Rare Diseases and Syndromes Observed in Newborn Babies with Idiopathic Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis. [Ethical Attitudes and Handling in Prenatal Conflict Situations - A Survey among Obstetricians and Prenatal Diagnosticians in Germany]. Significance of Physical Exercise in Pregnancy: Comparison of Short and Long Exercise Programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1