Healing rates and outcomes following closed transmetatarsal amputations: A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of proportions.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY Wound Repair and Regeneration Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-20 DOI:10.1111/wrr.13143
Tyler Coye, Elizabeth Ansert, Mehmet A Suludere, Jayer Chung, Gu Eon Kang, Lawrence A Lavery
{"title":"Healing rates and outcomes following closed transmetatarsal amputations: A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of proportions.","authors":"Tyler Coye, Elizabeth Ansert, Mehmet A Suludere, Jayer Chung, Gu Eon Kang, Lawrence A Lavery","doi":"10.1111/wrr.13143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a common surgical procedure for addressing severe forefoot pathologies, such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot infections. Variability in research methodologies and findings within the existing literature has hindered a comprehensive understanding of healing rates and complications following TMA. This meta-analysis and systematic review aims to consolidate available evidence, synthesising data from multiple studies to assess healing rates and complications associated with closed TMA procedures. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles published from January 1st, 1988, to June 1st, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting healing rates in non-traumatic transmetatarsal amputation patients with more than 10 participants, excluding open TMAs. Two independent reviewers selected relevant studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extracted from eligible studies included patient demographics, healing rates, complications, and study quality. Among 22 studies encompassing 1569 transmetatarsal amputations, the pooled healing rate was 67.3%. Major amputation rates ranged from 0% to 55.6%, with a random-effects pooled rate of 23.9%. Revision rates varied from 0% to 36.4%, resulting in a pooled rate of 14.8%. 30-day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%, with a fixed-effects pooled rate of 2.6%. Post-operative infection rates ranged from 3.0% to 30.7%, yielding a random-effects pooled rate of 16.7%. Dehiscence rates ranged from 1.7% to 60.0%, resulting in a random-effects pooled rate of 28.8%. Future studies should aim for standardised reporting and assess the physiological and treatment factors influencing healing and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23864,"journal":{"name":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wound Repair and Regeneration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is a common surgical procedure for addressing severe forefoot pathologies, such as peripheral vascular disease and diabetic foot infections. Variability in research methodologies and findings within the existing literature has hindered a comprehensive understanding of healing rates and complications following TMA. This meta-analysis and systematic review aims to consolidate available evidence, synthesising data from multiple studies to assess healing rates and complications associated with closed TMA procedures. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles published from January 1st, 1988, to June 1st, 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting healing rates in non-traumatic transmetatarsal amputation patients with more than 10 participants, excluding open TMAs. Two independent reviewers selected relevant studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion. Data extracted from eligible studies included patient demographics, healing rates, complications, and study quality. Among 22 studies encompassing 1569 transmetatarsal amputations, the pooled healing rate was 67.3%. Major amputation rates ranged from 0% to 55.6%, with a random-effects pooled rate of 23.9%. Revision rates varied from 0% to 36.4%, resulting in a pooled rate of 14.8%. 30-day mortality ranged from 0% to 9%, with a fixed-effects pooled rate of 2.6%. Post-operative infection rates ranged from 3.0% to 30.7%, yielding a random-effects pooled rate of 16.7%. Dehiscence rates ranged from 1.7% to 60.0%, resulting in a random-effects pooled rate of 28.8%. Future studies should aim for standardised reporting and assess the physiological and treatment factors influencing healing and complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
闭合性跨跖截肢术后的愈合率和疗效:系统回顾和随机效应比例元分析》。
经跖骨截肢(TMA)是一种常见的外科手术,用于治疗严重的前足病变,如外周血管疾病和糖尿病足感染。现有文献中的研究方法和研究结果存在差异,这阻碍了人们对 TMA 术后愈合率和并发症的全面了解。本荟萃分析和系统综述旨在整合现有证据,综合多项研究数据,评估闭合式 TMA 手术的愈合率和相关并发症。根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中 1988 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 1 日期间发表的文章进行了系统检索。纳入标准包括报告非创伤性经趾跖截肢患者愈合率的研究,参与者超过 10 人,不包括开放性经趾跖截肢。两位独立审稿人挑选了相关研究,并通过讨论解决了分歧。从符合条件的研究中提取的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征、愈合率、并发症和研究质量。22 项研究共进行了 1,569 例经跖骨截肢手术,汇总的愈合率为 67.3%。大截肢率从 0% 到 55.6% 不等,随机效应汇总率为 23.9%。翻修率从 0% 到 36.4% 不等,综合比率为 14.8%。30天死亡率从0%到9%不等,固定效应汇总死亡率为2.6%。术后感染率从3.0%到30.7%不等,随机效应汇总感染率为16.7%。开裂率从1.7%到60.0%不等,随机效应集中率为28.8%。未来的研究应以标准化报告为目标,并评估影响愈合和并发症的生理和治疗因素。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Wound Repair and Regeneration 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wound Repair and Regeneration provides extensive international coverage of cellular and molecular biology, connective tissue, and biological mediator studies in the field of tissue repair and regeneration and serves a diverse audience of surgeons, plastic surgeons, dermatologists, biochemists, cell biologists, and others. Wound Repair and Regeneration is the official journal of The Wound Healing Society, The European Tissue Repair Society, The Japanese Society for Wound Healing, and The Australian Wound Management Association.
期刊最新文献
Effects of a bioengineered allogeneic cellular construct on burn-related macrophage phenotype. Digital ulcers associated with scleroderma: A major unmet medical need. Novel multi-spectral short-wave infrared imaging for assessment of human burn wound depth. Vitabiotic: An alternative approach to diabetic foot. Skin metabolism in obesity: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1