Increasing Incremental Burden of Surgical Bleeding Associated with Multiple Comorbidities as Measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2023-12-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S434779
Mosadoluwa Afolabi, Stephen S Johnston, Pranjal Tewari, Walter A Danker
{"title":"Increasing Incremental Burden of Surgical Bleeding Associated with Multiple Comorbidities as Measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index: A Retrospective Database Analysis.","authors":"Mosadoluwa Afolabi, Stephen S Johnston, Pranjal Tewari, Walter A Danker","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S434779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Disruptive bleeding can complicate surgical procedures, increasing resource use, and impacting patients' well-being. This study aims to elucidate the impact of comorbidity on the risk of disruptive surgical-related bleeding and selected transfusion-associated complications, as well as the incremental cost of such bleeding.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database included patients who were age ≥18 years and who had a procedure of interest between 1-Jan-2019-31-Dec-2019: cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, cystectomy, hepatectomy, hysterectomy, pancreatectomy, peripheral vascular, thoracic, and valve procedures (first=index). The Elixhauser comorbidity index was assessed on index date and patients were grouped by cumulative comorbidity score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ≥6). Outcomes, all measured as in-hospital during index, included bleeding (diagnosis and/or intervention for bleeding), transfusion-associated complications (diagnosis of infection, acute renal failure, or vascular events), and incremental total hospital costs associated with bleeding. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to examine the association of comorbidity/bleeding with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 304,074 patients included, 7% experienced bleeding. The Elixhauser scores were distributed as follows: 0=29%, 1=23%, 2=18%, 3=12%, 4=8%, 5=5%, ≥6=5%. Odds of bleeding significantly increased with Elixhauser score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (odds ratio [OR] =1.30, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] =1.19-1.43), and this trend continued to surge (≥6 comorbidities [OR=3.22, 95% CI=2.94-3.53]). Similarly, the odds of transfusion-associated complications significantly increased with comorbidities score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.88-2.34), ≥6 comorbidities vs 0 (OR=12.37, 95% CI=10.80-14.16). The incremental cost of bleeding also increased with comorbidities score; per-patient costs with and without bleeding were $18,132 vs $13,190, p < 0.001 among patients with 0 comorbidities and $28,952 vs $19,623, p < 0.001 among patients with ≥6 comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher comorbidity burden was associated with significant increases in the risk of surgical bleeding, subsequent transfusion-related complications, and incremental cost burden of bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"237-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10706582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S434779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Disruptive bleeding can complicate surgical procedures, increasing resource use, and impacting patients' well-being. This study aims to elucidate the impact of comorbidity on the risk of disruptive surgical-related bleeding and selected transfusion-associated complications, as well as the incremental cost of such bleeding.

Patients and methods: This retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database included patients who were age ≥18 years and who had a procedure of interest between 1-Jan-2019-31-Dec-2019: cholecystectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, cystectomy, hepatectomy, hysterectomy, pancreatectomy, peripheral vascular, thoracic, and valve procedures (first=index). The Elixhauser comorbidity index was assessed on index date and patients were grouped by cumulative comorbidity score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ≥6). Outcomes, all measured as in-hospital during index, included bleeding (diagnosis and/or intervention for bleeding), transfusion-associated complications (diagnosis of infection, acute renal failure, or vascular events), and incremental total hospital costs associated with bleeding. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to examine the association of comorbidity/bleeding with outcomes.

Results: Of the 304,074 patients included, 7% experienced bleeding. The Elixhauser scores were distributed as follows: 0=29%, 1=23%, 2=18%, 3=12%, 4=8%, 5=5%, ≥6=5%. Odds of bleeding significantly increased with Elixhauser score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (odds ratio [OR] =1.30, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] =1.19-1.43), and this trend continued to surge (≥6 comorbidities [OR=3.22, 95% CI=2.94-3.53]). Similarly, the odds of transfusion-associated complications significantly increased with comorbidities score: 1 comorbidity vs 0 (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.88-2.34), ≥6 comorbidities vs 0 (OR=12.37, 95% CI=10.80-14.16). The incremental cost of bleeding also increased with comorbidities score; per-patient costs with and without bleeding were $18,132 vs $13,190, p < 0.001 among patients with 0 comorbidities and $28,952 vs $19,623, p < 0.001 among patients with ≥6 comorbidities.

Conclusion: Higher comorbidity burden was associated with significant increases in the risk of surgical bleeding, subsequent transfusion-related complications, and incremental cost burden of bleeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用艾利克肖瑟疾病指数衡量与多种并发症相关的手术出血增量负担:回顾性数据库分析
目的:破坏性出血会使外科手术复杂化,增加资源使用并影响患者的健康。本研究旨在阐明合并症对破坏性手术相关出血和特定输血相关并发症风险的影响,以及此类出血的增量成本:这项对Premier医疗数据库的回顾性分析纳入了年龄≥18岁且在2019年1月1日-2019年12月31日期间进行过相关手术的患者:胆囊切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术、膀胱切除术、肝切除术、子宫切除术、胰腺切除术、外周血管手术、胸腔手术和瓣膜手术(first=index)。埃利克斯豪泽尔合并症指数在指数日期进行评估,患者按累计合并症评分(0、1、2、3、4、5、≥6)分组。结果均以指数期间的院内情况衡量,包括出血(诊断和/或出血干预)、输血相关并发症(感染、急性肾功能衰竭或血管事件的诊断)以及与出血相关的医院总费用增量。采用多变量广义线性模型研究合并症/出血与预后的关系:在纳入的 304,074 名患者中,有 7% 的患者发生过出血。Elixhauser评分分布如下:0=29%, 1=23%, 2=18%, 3=12%, 4=8%, 5=5%, ≥6=5%.出血几率随 Elixhauser 评分的升高而明显增加:1 项合并症与 0 项合并症相比(几率比 [OR] =1.30,95% 置信区间 [95% CI] =1.19-1.43),且这一趋势持续上升(≥6 项合并症 [OR=3.22, 95% CI=2.94-3.53])。同样,输血相关并发症的几率随着合并症得分的增加而显著增加:合并症为 1 vs 0 (OR=2.14, 95% CI=1.88-2.34), 合并症≥6 vs 0 (OR=12.37, 95% CI=10.80-14.16)。出血的增量成本也随着合并症得分的增加而增加;合并症为0的患者中,有出血和无出血的人均成本分别为18,132美元对13,190美元,P<0.001;合并症≥6的患者中,有出血和无出血的人均成本分别为28,952美元对19,623美元,P<0.001:结论:较高的合并症负担与手术出血风险、后续输血相关并发症和出血的增量成本负担显著增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Initial Validation of the NOL Nociception Level Index® Monitoring System in Black and Multiracial People. Potential of Aluminum Drug Packages with Press-Through Packaging Considering Usability for a Wide Range of Users. The Application Effect of Fine Management Combined with Man-Machine Fixation Mode in Reducing the Attrition Rate of Laparoscopic Instruments-A Non-Randomized, Concurrent Controlled Study. Patients with Growth-Related Disorders and Caregivers Prefer the Somapacitan Device to the Somatrogon Device: Results from a Randomized Crossover Study Assessing Device Preference and Ease of Use Following Simulated Injections. May Glymphatic Drainage Improve Life Quality in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Outpatients?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1