Profession-based manual therapy nomenclature: exploring history, limitations, and opportunities.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1080/10669817.2023.2288495
Brian Degenhardt, Patrick L S van Dun, Eric Jacobson, Sandy Fritz, Paul Mettler, Norman Kettner, G Franklin, Kendi Hensel, David Lesondak, Giacomo Consorti, Leah Frank, William R Reed, Cameron MacDonald, Vaclav Kremen, Crystal Martin, Bernie Landels, Paul Standley
{"title":"Profession-based manual therapy nomenclature: exploring history, limitations, and opportunities.","authors":"Brian Degenhardt, Patrick L S van Dun, Eric Jacobson, Sandy Fritz, Paul Mettler, Norman Kettner, G Franklin, Kendi Hensel, David Lesondak, Giacomo Consorti, Leah Frank, William R Reed, Cameron MacDonald, Vaclav Kremen, Crystal Martin, Bernie Landels, Paul Standley","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2023.2288495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The International Consortium on Manual Therapies (ICMT) is a grassroots interprofessional association open to any formally trained practitioner of manual therapy (MT) and basic scientists promoting research related to the practice of MT. Currently, MT research is impeded by professions' lack of communication with other MT professions, biases, and vernacular. Current ICMT goals are to minimize these barriers, compare MT techniques, and establish an interprofessional MT glossary.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Practitioners from all professions with training in manual therapies were encouraged by e-mail and website to participate (www.ICMTConferene.org). Video conferences were conducted at least bimonthly for 2.5 years by profession-specific and interprofessional focus groups (FGs). Members summarized scopes of practice, technique descriptions, associated mechanisms of action (MOA), and glossary terms. Each profession presented their work to the interprofessional FG to promote dialogue, understanding and consensus. Outcomes were reported and refined at numerous public events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus groups with representatives from 5 MT professions, chiropractic, massage therapy, osteopathic, physical therapy and structural integration identified 17 targeting osseous structures and 49 targeting nonosseous structures. Thirty-two techniques appeared distinct to a specific profession, and 13 were used by more than 1. Comparing descriptions identified additional commonalities. All professions agreed on 4 MOA categories for MT. A glossary of 280 terms and definitions was consolidated, representing key concepts in MT. Twenty-one terms were used by all MT professions and basic scientists. Five terms were used by MT professions exclusive of basic scientists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes suggested a third to a half of techniques used in MT are similar across professions. Additional research is needed to better define the extent of similarity and how to consistently identify those approaches. Ongoing expansion and refinement of the glossary is necessary to promote descriptive clarity and facilitate communication between practitioners and basic scientists.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"96-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10795627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2288495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The International Consortium on Manual Therapies (ICMT) is a grassroots interprofessional association open to any formally trained practitioner of manual therapy (MT) and basic scientists promoting research related to the practice of MT. Currently, MT research is impeded by professions' lack of communication with other MT professions, biases, and vernacular. Current ICMT goals are to minimize these barriers, compare MT techniques, and establish an interprofessional MT glossary.

Methods: Practitioners from all professions with training in manual therapies were encouraged by e-mail and website to participate (www.ICMTConferene.org). Video conferences were conducted at least bimonthly for 2.5 years by profession-specific and interprofessional focus groups (FGs). Members summarized scopes of practice, technique descriptions, associated mechanisms of action (MOA), and glossary terms. Each profession presented their work to the interprofessional FG to promote dialogue, understanding and consensus. Outcomes were reported and refined at numerous public events.

Results: Focus groups with representatives from 5 MT professions, chiropractic, massage therapy, osteopathic, physical therapy and structural integration identified 17 targeting osseous structures and 49 targeting nonosseous structures. Thirty-two techniques appeared distinct to a specific profession, and 13 were used by more than 1. Comparing descriptions identified additional commonalities. All professions agreed on 4 MOA categories for MT. A glossary of 280 terms and definitions was consolidated, representing key concepts in MT. Twenty-one terms were used by all MT professions and basic scientists. Five terms were used by MT professions exclusive of basic scientists.

Conclusion: Outcomes suggested a third to a half of techniques used in MT are similar across professions. Additional research is needed to better define the extent of similarity and how to consistently identify those approaches. Ongoing expansion and refinement of the glossary is necessary to promote descriptive clarity and facilitate communication between practitioners and basic scientists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于专业的徒手疗法命名法:探索历史、局限性和机遇。
目的:国际手法治疗联合会(ICMT)是一个基层的跨专业协会,任何经过正式培训的手法治疗从业人员和基础科学家均可加入,以促进与手法治疗实践相关的研究。目前,MT 研究因缺乏与其他 MT 专业的交流、偏见和方言而受到阻碍。目前 ICMT 的目标是最大限度地减少这些障碍、比较 MT 技术并建立跨专业 MT 术语表:通过电子邮件和网站鼓励所有接受过手法治疗培训的从业人员参与(www.ICMTConferene.org)。在两年半的时间里,各专业和跨专业焦点小组(FGs)至少每两个月举行一次视频会议。成员们总结了实践范围、技术描述、相关作用机制 (MOA) 和术语表。每个专业都向跨专业 FG 介绍了自己的工作,以促进对话、理解和共识。在许多公共活动中对成果进行了报告和完善:来自脊骨神经科、按摩疗法、整骨疗法、物理疗法和结构整合疗法 5 个 MT 专业的代表参加了焦点小组,确定了 17 种针对骨性结构的技术和 49 种针对非骨性结构的技术。有 32 种技术似乎与特定的专业有所区别,有 13 种技术被多个专业使用。所有专业都同意 MT 的 4 个 MOA 类别。合并了 280 个术语和定义,代表了 MT 的关键概念。所有 MT 专业人员和基础科学家都使用了 21 个术语。除基础科学家外,其他 MT 专业人士使用了 5 个术语:研究结果表明,各专业在 MT 中使用的技术有三分之一到一半是相似的。需要进行更多的研究,以更好地确定相似程度以及如何一致地识别这些方法。有必要不断扩展和完善术语表,以提高描述的清晰度,促进从业人员和基础科学家之间的交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of manual therapy for sacroiliac joint pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Recognition of a patient with neck autonomic dysfunction: findings from a rare case report of harlequin syndrome in direct access physiotherapy. Autonomic nervous system and endocrine system response to upper or lower cervical spine mobilization in males with persistent post-concussion symptoms: a proof-of-concept trial. Management of concussion symptoms utilizing Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy: a case series. Differences in physical examination findings between those who present with or without headache soon after a whiplash injury: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1