[Driving: What is the relevance and usability of the Reisberg scale in 2023?]

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1684/pnv.2023.1118
Chloé Lazeras, Marie Bonnet, Brice Laurens, Gilles Berrut, Éric Dumas, Philippe Dombret, Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume, Philippe Lauwick, Francis Abramovici, Maria Soto-Martin, Virginie Goutte
{"title":"[Driving: What is the relevance and usability of the Reisberg scale in 2023?]","authors":"Chloé Lazeras, Marie Bonnet, Brice Laurens, Gilles Berrut, Éric Dumas, Philippe Dombret, Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume, Philippe Lauwick, Francis Abramovici, Maria Soto-Martin, Virginie Goutte","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2023.1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The publication of the decree on the care of people with neurocognitive disorders brought to the fore the Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale, a scale that only few clinicians use in memory centers or in geriatric. This scale has a number of limitations, not least of which is that it is obsolete, since it does not take into account disease advances in scientific knowledge with biomarkers. Consequently, the stages evoked no longer correspond to current descriptions. Moreover, it only concerns Alzheimer's disease, whereas in our practice we encounter other neurodegenerative pathologies. Even if we decide to use another global assessment scale, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating or the Functional Assessment Staging, they cannot replace a personalized assessment. Indeed, it is important to stress that this decree does not take into account the relevance of personalized assessments using, for example, neuropsychological tests to estimate driving ability. A personalized assessment accompanied by a real-life driving test would be preferable than a score on a global scale. This article therefore presents the Global Deterioration Scale, highlighting its unsuitability for assessing whether or not to continue driving.</p>","PeriodicalId":51244,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","volume":"21 3","pages":"343-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2023.1118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The publication of the decree on the care of people with neurocognitive disorders brought to the fore the Reisberg's Global Deterioration Scale, a scale that only few clinicians use in memory centers or in geriatric. This scale has a number of limitations, not least of which is that it is obsolete, since it does not take into account disease advances in scientific knowledge with biomarkers. Consequently, the stages evoked no longer correspond to current descriptions. Moreover, it only concerns Alzheimer's disease, whereas in our practice we encounter other neurodegenerative pathologies. Even if we decide to use another global assessment scale, such as the Clinical Dementia Rating or the Functional Assessment Staging, they cannot replace a personalized assessment. Indeed, it is important to stress that this decree does not take into account the relevance of personalized assessments using, for example, neuropsychological tests to estimate driving ability. A personalized assessment accompanied by a real-life driving test would be preferable than a score on a global scale. This article therefore presents the Global Deterioration Scale, highlighting its unsuitability for assessing whether or not to continue driving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[驱动力:2023 年,雷斯伯格量表的相关性和可用性如何?]
关于护理神经认知障碍患者的法令》的发布使莱斯伯格的 "全面恶化量表"(Global Deterioration Scale)成为关注的焦点。该量表有许多局限性,其中最重要的一点是它已经过时,因为它没有考虑到生物标志物科学知识在疾病方面的进步。因此,所唤起的阶段不再符合当前的描述。此外,它只涉及阿尔茨海默病,而在我们的实践中,我们还会遇到其他神经退行性病变。即使我们决定使用另一种全球评估量表,如临床痴呆评级或功能评估分期,它们也无法取代个性化评估。事实上,必须强调的是,该法令并未考虑到个性化评估的相关性,例如使用神经心理测试来评估驾驶能力。个性化评估与实际驾驶测试相结合,要优于全面评分。因此,本文介绍了 "全面退化量表",并强调该量表不适合用于评估是否继续驾驶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: D''une qualité scientifique reconnue cette revue est, la première revue francophone gériatrique et psychologique indexée dans les principales bases de données internationales. Elle couvre tous les aspects médicaux, psychologiques, sanitaires et sociaux liés au suivi et à la prise en charge de la personne âgée. Que vous soyez psychologues, neurologues, psychiatres, gériatres, gérontologues,... vous trouverez à travers cette approche originale et unique, un veritable outil de formation, de réflexion et d''échanges indispensable à votre pratique professionnelle.
期刊最新文献
[Ambivalence when faced with e-sports competition among nursing home residents. Rivalry and depressiveness stakes: Marie-Louise's case, 93 years old]. [Description of early deaths of nursing home residents hospitalized after admission in emergency department]. [Development of an evaluation grid for the degree of application of the Montessori method adapted to elderly people in nursing homes]. [État de l'auto-soutien des patientes âgées atteintes d'un cancer du sein et facteurs individuels associés]. [Homicide-suicide: geriatrics aspects in forensic medicine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1