Current pediatric pain practice in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia: A prospective survey of anesthetists.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1111/pan.14818
Anisa Bhettay, Rebecca Gray, Ibironke Desalu, Romy Parker, Salome Maswime
{"title":"Current pediatric pain practice in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia: A prospective survey of anesthetists.","authors":"Anisa Bhettay, Rebecca Gray, Ibironke Desalu, Romy Parker, Salome Maswime","doi":"10.1111/pan.14818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children in hospital experience significant pain, either inherent with their pathology, or caused by diagnostic/therapeutic procedures. Little is known about pediatric pain practices in sub-Saharan Africa. This survey aimed to gain insight into current pain management practices among specialist physician anesthetists in four sub-Saharan African countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was sent to 365 specialist physician anesthetists in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. Content analysis included descriptive information about the respondents and their work environment. Thematic analysis considered resources available for pediatric pain management, personal and institutional pain practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-six responses were received (response rate 45.5%), with data from 141 analyzed; Nigeria (27), South Africa (52), Uganda (41) and Zambia (21). Most respondents (71.83%) worked at tertiary/national referral hospitals. The majority of respondents (130/141, 91.55%) had received teaching in pediatric pain management. Good availability was reported for simple analgesia, opioids, ketamine, and local anesthetics. Just over half always/often had access to nurses trained in pediatric care, and infusion pumps for continuous drug delivery. Catheters for regional anesthesia techniques and for patient-controlled analgesia were largely unavailable. Two thirds (94/141, 66.67%) did not have an institutional pediatric pain management guideline, but good pharmacological pain management practices were reported, in line with World Health Organization recommendations. Eighty-eight respondents (62.41%) indicated that they felt appropriate pain control in children was always/often achieved in their setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey provides insight into pediatric pain practices in these four countries. Good availability of a variety of analgesics, positive pain prescription practices, and utilization of some non-pharmacological pain management strategies are encouraging, and suggest that achieving good pain control despite limited resources is attainable. Areas for improvement include the development of institutional guidelines, routine utilization of pain assessment tools, and access to regional anesthesia and other advanced pain management techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children in hospital experience significant pain, either inherent with their pathology, or caused by diagnostic/therapeutic procedures. Little is known about pediatric pain practices in sub-Saharan Africa. This survey aimed to gain insight into current pain management practices among specialist physician anesthetists in four sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods: A survey was sent to 365 specialist physician anesthetists in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. Content analysis included descriptive information about the respondents and their work environment. Thematic analysis considered resources available for pediatric pain management, personal and institutional pain practices.

Results: One hundred and sixty-six responses were received (response rate 45.5%), with data from 141 analyzed; Nigeria (27), South Africa (52), Uganda (41) and Zambia (21). Most respondents (71.83%) worked at tertiary/national referral hospitals. The majority of respondents (130/141, 91.55%) had received teaching in pediatric pain management. Good availability was reported for simple analgesia, opioids, ketamine, and local anesthetics. Just over half always/often had access to nurses trained in pediatric care, and infusion pumps for continuous drug delivery. Catheters for regional anesthesia techniques and for patient-controlled analgesia were largely unavailable. Two thirds (94/141, 66.67%) did not have an institutional pediatric pain management guideline, but good pharmacological pain management practices were reported, in line with World Health Organization recommendations. Eighty-eight respondents (62.41%) indicated that they felt appropriate pain control in children was always/often achieved in their setting.

Conclusion: This survey provides insight into pediatric pain practices in these four countries. Good availability of a variety of analgesics, positive pain prescription practices, and utilization of some non-pharmacological pain management strategies are encouraging, and suggest that achieving good pain control despite limited resources is attainable. Areas for improvement include the development of institutional guidelines, routine utilization of pain assessment tools, and access to regional anesthesia and other advanced pain management techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚、南非、乌干达和赞比亚当前的儿科疼痛治疗实践:对麻醉师的前瞻性调查。
背景:住院儿童会有明显的疼痛感,这种疼痛可能是病理变化引起的,也可能是诊断/治疗过程造成的。人们对撒哈拉以南非洲地区的儿科疼痛治疗方法知之甚少。这项调查旨在深入了解撒哈拉以南非洲四个国家的专科麻醉医师目前的疼痛管理实践:向尼日利亚、南非、乌干达和赞比亚的 365 名专科麻醉医师发送了调查问卷。内容分析包括受访者及其工作环境的描述性信息。专题分析考虑了儿科疼痛管理的可用资源、个人和机构的疼痛实践:共收到 166 份回复(回复率为 45.5%),对其中 141 份的数据进行了分析;尼日利亚(27 份)、南非(52 份)、乌干达(41 份)和赞比亚(21 份)。大多数受访者(71.83%)在三级/国家转诊医院工作。大多数受访者(130/141,91.55%)接受过儿科疼痛治疗方面的培训。据报告,简单镇痛、阿片类药物、氯胺酮和局部麻醉剂的供应情况良好。略高于半数的医院总是/经常有接受过儿科护理培训的护士和持续给药的输液泵。用于区域麻醉技术和患者自控镇痛的导管基本没有。三分之二(94/141,66.67%)的机构没有儿科疼痛管理指南,但报告了良好的药物疼痛管理方法,符合世界卫生组织的建议。88名受访者(62.41%)表示,他们认为在他们的工作环境中,总是/经常对儿童进行适当的疼痛控制:结论:本次调查深入了解了这四个国家的儿科疼痛治疗方法。各种镇痛药的良好供应、积极的止痛处方做法以及一些非药物止痛策略的使用都令人鼓舞,并表明尽管资源有限,但实现良好的疼痛控制是可以实现的。需要改进的方面包括制定机构指南、常规使用疼痛评估工具以及区域麻醉和其他先进的疼痛管理技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The power of POCUS in every pocket: Handheld ultrasound the new essential tool? Severe knotting guidewire after central venous catheterization. Ball valve gas trapping in pediatric one-lung ventilation: Not all ventilation is loss of isolation. Links between mutations in functionally separate arms of mitochondrial complex I and responses to volatile anesthetics. Feasibility of bispectral index monitoring during pediatric critical care transport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1