Anti-tumor necrosis factor α: originators versus biosimilars, comparison in clinical response assessment in a multicenter cohort of patients with inflammatory arthropathies.

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY Reumatismo Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.4081/reumatismo.2023.1602
C Gioia, A Picchianti Diamanti, R Perricone, M S Chimenti, A Afeltra, L Navarini, A Migliore, U Massafra, V Bruzzese, P Scolieri, C Meschini, M Paroli, R Caccavale, P Scapato, R Scrivo, F Conti, B Laganà, M Di Franco
{"title":"Anti-tumor necrosis factor α: originators <i>versus</i> biosimilars, comparison in clinical response assessment in a multicenter cohort of patients with inflammatory arthropathies.","authors":"C Gioia, A Picchianti Diamanti, R Perricone, M S Chimenti, A Afeltra, L Navarini, A Migliore, U Massafra, V Bruzzese, P Scolieri, C Meschini, M Paroli, R Caccavale, P Scapato, R Scrivo, F Conti, B Laganà, M Di Franco","doi":"10.4081/reumatismo.2023.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars (SB4 and ABP501) and respective bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We consequently enrolled patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, treated with SB4, and ABP501, or with corresponding originators, belonging to the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region (Italy), from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected at recruitment and after 4, 8, 12, and 24 months of therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars [SB4/ABP501 276/179; female/male 307/146; biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-DMARD) naïve 56%, median age/ interquartile range 55/46-65 years] and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, female/ male 279/157, b-DMARD naïve 67,2%, median age/interquartile range 53/43-62 years). No differences were found about safety, but the biosimilar group presented more discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001). Female gender, being a smoker, and being b-DMARD naïve were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0.05, p=0.046, p=0.001 respectively). The retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at 4 months showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until 24 months (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented a cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-life data demonstrated a similar safety profile between biosimilars and originators, but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months. Biosimilars could be considered a valid, safe, and less expensive alternative to originators, allowing access to treatments for a wider patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21222,"journal":{"name":"Reumatismo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatismo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2023.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars (SB4 and ABP501) and respective bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest.

Methods: We consequently enrolled patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, treated with SB4, and ABP501, or with corresponding originators, belonging to the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region (Italy), from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected at recruitment and after 4, 8, 12, and 24 months of therapy.

Results: The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars [SB4/ABP501 276/179; female/male 307/146; biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-DMARD) naïve 56%, median age/ interquartile range 55/46-65 years] and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, female/ male 279/157, b-DMARD naïve 67,2%, median age/interquartile range 53/43-62 years). No differences were found about safety, but the biosimilar group presented more discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001). Female gender, being a smoker, and being b-DMARD naïve were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0.05, p=0.046, p=0.001 respectively). The retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at 4 months showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until 24 months (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented a cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Real-life data demonstrated a similar safety profile between biosimilars and originators, but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months. Biosimilars could be considered a valid, safe, and less expensive alternative to originators, allowing access to treatments for a wider patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗肿瘤坏死因子α:原研药与生物仿制药,炎症性关节病多中心队列临床反应评估比较。
目的比较依那西普(etanercept)和阿达木单抗(adalimumab)生物仿制药(SB4和ABP501)与各自生物原研药在现实生活中的安全性和有效性:因此,我们在 2017 年至 2020 年期间招募了类风湿性关节炎、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者,他们接受了 SB4 和 ABP501 或相应原研药的治疗,这些患者均属于拉齐奥大区(意大利)的主要生物处方中心。在招募时以及治疗4、8、12和24个月后收集数据:多中心队列由455名接受生物仿制药治疗的患者组成[SB4/ABP501 276/179;女性/男性 307/146;年龄中位数/四分位数范围55/46-65岁]和436名接受原研药治疗的患者(etanercept/adalimumab 186/259,女性/男性279/157,年龄中位数/四分位数范围53/43-62岁,67.2%接受过生物修饰抗风湿药(b-DMARD)治疗)。在安全性方面没有发现差异,但生物仿制药组因疗效不佳而停药的情况较多(p 结论:真实数据表明,生物仿制药与原研药的安全性相似,但生物仿制药在 24 个月内的保留率较低。生物仿制药可被视为原研药的一种有效、安全且成本较低的替代品,使更多患者能够获得治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatismo
Reumatismo RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Reumatismo is the official Journal of the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR). It publishes Abstracts and Proceedings of Italian Congresses and original papers concerning rheumatology. Reumatismo is published quarterly and is sent free of charge to the Members of the SIR who regularly pay the annual fee. Those who are not Members of the SIR as well as Corporations and Institutions may also subscribe to the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of poor outcomes in juvenile dermatomyositis: what do we know? A narrative review. The holistic management of peripheral spondyloarthritis: focus on articular involvement in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PASSing to the patient side: early achieving of an acceptable symptom state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Janus kinase inhibitors. Inflammatory back pain as an unusual manifestation of Takayasu arteritis: a case report. Baricitinib in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis: report of six cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1