Continuous investigation of the nasal cycle over 48 hours.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.4193/RhinRhin23.284
J Lindemann, M O Scheithauer, F Sommer, T K Hoffmann, J Hahn, J Foerg
{"title":"Continuous investigation of the nasal cycle over 48 hours.","authors":"J Lindemann, M O Scheithauer, F Sommer, T K Hoffmann, J Hahn, J Foerg","doi":"10.4193/RhinRhin23.284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous results on the nasal cycle refer to measurements over up to 24h. The long-term rhinoflowmetry (LRFM) allows continuous observations over a longer period. The aim of the study was to observe the nasal cycle for the first time over 48h under everyday conditions.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The LRFM was continuously applied to 30 rhinologically healthy subjects (20 female, 10 male) over 48h. The different types of nasal cycle were classified as follows: \"classic\", \"in concert\", \"one-sided\", \"no-cycle\" and \"mixed\". The focus of this study was on the results over the entire 48 hours. The comparison of the two consecutive days was also made.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A nasal cycle could be detected in 100% of the subjects over 48h. With 97%, the mixed type most commonly occurred as a combination of classical and in concert components. In all subjects, classical cycle components could be detected at least once. The no-cycle type was not observed. In the awake state, the mixed type dominated (80%), as a combination of classical and in concert parts. In the sleep state, the classical type was the most common type (97%). The average phase duration was 206 +- 83 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the very first continuous 48-hour study on the nasal cycle, 100% of the subjects presented a nasal cycle. The LRFM method is the only one that offers the possibility to perform continuous measurements over a longer period during daily routine. The results of previous single-stage examination methods should thus be questioned.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"362-369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/RhinRhin23.284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous results on the nasal cycle refer to measurements over up to 24h. The long-term rhinoflowmetry (LRFM) allows continuous observations over a longer period. The aim of the study was to observe the nasal cycle for the first time over 48h under everyday conditions.

Methodology: The LRFM was continuously applied to 30 rhinologically healthy subjects (20 female, 10 male) over 48h. The different types of nasal cycle were classified as follows: "classic", "in concert", "one-sided", "no-cycle" and "mixed". The focus of this study was on the results over the entire 48 hours. The comparison of the two consecutive days was also made.

Results: A nasal cycle could be detected in 100% of the subjects over 48h. With 97%, the mixed type most commonly occurred as a combination of classical and in concert components. In all subjects, classical cycle components could be detected at least once. The no-cycle type was not observed. In the awake state, the mixed type dominated (80%), as a combination of classical and in concert parts. In the sleep state, the classical type was the most common type (97%). The average phase duration was 206 +- 83 minutes.

Conclusions: In the very first continuous 48-hour study on the nasal cycle, 100% of the subjects presented a nasal cycle. The LRFM method is the only one that offers the possibility to perform continuous measurements over a longer period during daily routine. The results of previous single-stage examination methods should thus be questioned.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对 48 小时内的鼻腔周期进行连续调查。
背景:以往关于鼻腔周期的研究结果最多只能测量 24 小时。长期鼻流量计(LRFM)可以进行更长时间的连续观察。本研究的目的是首次在日常条件下观察 48 小时的鼻周期:对 30 名鼻腔健康的受试者(20 名女性,10 名男性)连续使用 LRFM 48 小时。不同类型的鼻周期被分为以下几种:经典鼻周期、协同鼻周期、单侧鼻周期、无鼻周期和混合鼻周期。本研究的重点是整个 48 小时内的结果。同时还对连续两天的结果进行了比较:结果:在 48 小时内,100% 的受试者都能检测到鼻腔循环。其中 97% 的受试者属于混合型,最常见的是经典成分和协同成分的组合。在所有受试者中,至少有一次能检测到经典周期成分。没有观察到无周期型。在清醒状态下,混合型占主导地位(80%),是古典和协奏部分的组合。在睡眠状态下,最常见的类型是古典类型(97%)。平均相位持续时间为 206 ± 83 分钟:在首次连续 48 小时的鼻周期研究中,100% 的受试者都出现了鼻周期。LRFM 方法是唯一一种可以在日常生活中进行较长时间连续测量的方法。因此,以前的单阶段检查方法的结果应该受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1